[D66] The Solar Bond Hypothesis: On the Non-Local Companionship of Electrons and the Interior Sun

[René Oudeweg]

The Solar Bond Hypothesis:
On the Non-Local
Companionship of Electrons
and the Interior Sun

René Oudeweg
December 30, 2025

GPT 5.2 paper


On 12/27/25 16:29, René Oudeweg wrote:
> *http://www.tuxtown.net/pipermail/d66/2023-May/072936.html* <http:// 
> www.tuxtown.net/pipermail/d66/2023-May/072936.html>
> 
> *
> *
> 
> *The Solar Bond Hypothesis: On the Non-Local Companionship of Electrons 
> and the Interior Sun*
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>       I. Introduction: Beyond Heat and Light
> 
> Modern thought has grown accustomed to the Sun as an engine: a 
> thermonuclear furnace whose only conversations with Earth are conducted 
> in photons and gravity. Heat warms the oceans, light feeds the leaf, 
> gravity steadies the orbit. Yet this picture, precise as it is, may be 
> incomplete—not in its calculations, but in its imagination.
> 
> This essay proposes a speculative hypothesis, philosophical rather than 
> physical, which I will call *the Solar Bond Hypothesis*. It suggests 
> that every electron localized on Earth is non-locally paired—/entangled 
> in being, if not in measurement/—with a complementary electron within 
> the Sun. The Sun, under this view, is not merely a distant energy source 
> but a continuous participant in the material and biological reality of 
> Earth.
> 
> This is not Wheeler’s one-electron universe, looping through time and 
> masquerading as multiplicity. Rather, it is a relational hypothesis: a 
> many-electron cosmos bound by enduring, asymmetric partnerships between 
> the terrestrial and the solar.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>       II. Locality as a Habit of Thought
> 
> Locality is one of the most deeply ingrained habits of human reasoning. 
> We assume that what is /here/ is ontologically separate from what is / 
> there/, connected only by intermediaries that travel across space. 
> Quantum theory unsettled this habit by introducing entanglement— 
> correlations that persist without signal, without delay, without spatial 
> mediation.
> 
> Physics treats entanglement cautiously: it is mathematically rigorous 
> but metaphysically restrained. It describes correlations, not 
> commitments; measurements, not meanings. Philosophy, however, is under 
> no such obligation. It may ask what entanglement /suggests/ about the 
> structure of reality, even where experiment remains silent.
> 
> The Solar Bond Hypothesis begins from this opening.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>       III. The Hypothesis Stated
> 
> The hypothesis can be stated simply:
> 
>     For every electron that appears localized in Earth-bound matter—
>     whether in rock, water, or living tissue—there exists a
>     corresponding electron within the Sun with which it shares a
>     persistent, non-local bond.
> 
> This bond is not proposed as dynamically observable, nor as a channel of 
> information. It does not violate causality, nor does it allow the Sun to 
> “control” the Earth. Instead, it is ontological: a shared condition of 
> existence, a mutual definition across distance.
> 
> The electron on Earth is never fully alone. Its identity is partially 
> constituted by an electron in the Sun.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>       IV. The Sun Reimagined
> 
> Under this view, the Sun acquires a second role alongside fusion and 
> illumination. It becomes a *reservoir of entangled counterparts*, a vast 
> interior archive of relationships that extend into every atom on Earth.
> 
> The Sun is no longer merely /over there/. It is folded, quietly and 
> continuously, into the constitution of terrestrial matter. The iron in 
> blood, the ions in neurons, the electrons that make chemistry possible— 
> all are half-solar in their being.
> 
> This does not anthropomorphize the Sun, nor does it mystify it. Rather, 
> it deepens its relevance. The Sun becomes not just the origin of life’s 
> energy, but a silent participant in life’s material coherence.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>       V. Living Matter and Asymmetric Entanglement
> 
> The hypothesis takes on special significance when applied to living systems.
> 
> Living matter is distinguished not by its ingredients but by its 
> organization—by persistence far from equilibrium, by memory, by 
> responsiveness. If electrons in living tissue are entangled with solar 
> electrons, then life exists in a condition of *asymmetric entanglement*: 
> one partner dynamic, metabolic, transient; the other massive, stable, 
> enduring.
> 
> The Sun changes slowly. Life changes rapidly. The bond is thus uneven, 
> like that between a mayfly and a mountain. Yet the mountain’s presence 
> matters—not as a force, but as a stabilizing reference, a deep 
> background against which fragility persists.
> 
> In this sense, life on Earth is not merely /under/ the Sun, but /with/ it.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>       VI. Non-Local Belonging
> 
> Philosophically, the Solar Bond Hypothesis suggests a revision of 
> belonging. To belong somewhere is not merely to occupy a location, but 
> to be partially constituted by something beyond oneself.
> 
> Under this hypothesis, no electron on Earth is entirely terrestrial. 
> Every piece of matter carries an unbroken, if inaccessible, relation to 
> the solar interior. Earth is not an isolated stage receiving energy from 
> afar; it is a peripheral expression of a larger, distributed system 
> whose core burns ninety-three million miles away.
> 
> Locality becomes a practical approximation, not an ultimate truth.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>       VII. Ethics and Humility
> 
> If the hypothesis were taken seriously—not as physics, but as worldview— 
> it would encourage a certain humility. To harm the Earth would no longer 
> be merely to disrupt a local environment, but to strain a relationship 
> that extends into the Sun itself. Conversely, the Sun’s apparent 
> indifference would mask an intimate structural involvement in our existence.
> 
> Such a view resists both domination and despair. It denies that we are 
> isolated accidents, while also denying that we are central or chosen. We 
> are participants in a vast, quiet reciprocity.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>       VIII. Conclusion: A Sun That Is Never Elsewhere
> 
> The Solar Bond Hypothesis does not ask to be tested, only contemplated. 
> It offers no predictions, only a reframing: the idea that matter is less 
> self-contained than it appears, and that distance is not the same as 
> separation.
> 
> In this speculative vision, the Sun is never fully elsewhere. Its 
> electrons are already here—paired, bound, and silently co-present in the 
> fabric of Earthly things. And every local electron, no matter how small, 
> carries within its existence a distant, burning companion.
> 
> The cosmos, then, is not merely connected by forces, but /composed of 
> relationships that never entirely let go/.
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: solarbond.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 46254 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.tuxtown.net/pipermail/d66/attachments/20251230/a01bbd95/attachment-0001.pdf>