Fwd: [Marxism] Wikileaks hacktivism

[Antid Oto]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/11/AR2010121102897.html

WikiLeaks' advocates are wreaking 'hacktivism'

By Ian Shapira and Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, December 12, 2010; 12:01 AM

In England, a 26-year-old advertising agency employee caters to
multinational clients but on the side has been communicating with a
secretive band of strangers devoted to supporting WikiLeaks.

Halfway around the world, a 24-year-old in Montana has used a publicly
available - and, according to security experts, suddenly popular
software program called Low Orbit Ion Cannon with the goal of shutting
down Web sites of WikiLeaks' perceived enemies.

Since releasing a vast cache of diplomatic cables this month, the
anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks has been the focus of intense criticism:
for divulging classified materials, embarrassing the U.S. government and
potentially endangering lives. But it has also engendered the frenzied
support of an expanding and loosely defined global collective that seems
intent on speaking out - and in some cases waging war on WikiLeaks' behalf.

The most prominent of those groups is known as Anonymous, which this
past week sought to disable the Web sites of several U.S. companies as
part of what it called Operation Payback.WikiLeaks has also drawn the
support of traditional civil rights organizations and advocacy groups,
which see the controversy surrounding WikiLeaks as an important test of
U.S. commitment to freedom of the Internet.

Several groups have expressed dismay over recent statements by U.S.
politicians suggesting that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange should be
branded an international terrorist or perhaps even assassinated. In a
series of ads to be published in U.S. newspapers this week, the
Australian activist group GetUp calls on Washington to "stand up for our
shared democratic principles of the presumption of innocence and freedom
of information."

But it is the activities of Anonymous and its members that have caused
the greatest stir online. In addition to launching "denial of service"
attacks on various Web sites, the group's members have issued open
letters in support of WikiLeaks and sought to drum up support for
Assange as Time magazine's "Person of the Year." (By Sunday, he was in
the No. 1 spot in Time's poll, with nearly 400,000 votes.)

When contacted through Twitter, Anonymous members said in recent days
they have been driven by fears of civil rights intrusions and
totalitarian futures.

"Whether the fear is logical or not, I see a lot of aspects of George
Orwell and Aldous Huxley's dystopias coming into play in a lot of the
U.S. government's policies," said the Montana man, who said he was a
staffer at a group home for mentally disabled adults.

The man, who declined to be named because he said he feared arrest,
compared the attacks on U.S. companies' Web sites - known to some as
"hacktivism" - to earlier versions of civil protests: "It was like the
sit-ins during the 1960s when you had college students taking up space
in restaurants."

Now, Anonymous is helping a wider audience comb through the WikiLeaks
documents in a new campaign called Operation Leakspin. On the social
media Web site Reddit, the Montana member of Anonymous said he helps
moderate a "sub-Reddit" section where users sift through various leaked
State Department cables. Reddit users post comments, vote on which
cables are the most revelatory and click back to WikiLeaks' site to view
the entire cable.

The Montana man said Reddit allows the Anonymous movement, whose members
chat with one another on hard-to-find servers and in instant message
rooms, to influence a broader readership.

"Rather than putting these cables on our own server, we're making it
more available to everyone. We got everyone's attention with the
distributed denial of service attacks, so now we're looking more at
what's in the leaks," he said. "The call now is to stop the attacks. I
didn't do much of those. I wasn't one of the people who thought it was
necessary, but what I think doesn't matter. The majority has to think it."

It's unclear how many people consider themselves as part of the
Anonymous movement. Various Twitter groups seemingly affiliated with the
organization provide rough estimates of its influence: Anonops has
nearly 10,000 followers; Operation Leakspin has more than 1,300
followers; Anonymous Operations has about 1,200 followers.

The group achieved some infamy two years ago when WikiLeaks published
the private emails of former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and
said it received the files from Anonymous.

Anonymous members meet on other Web sites, whose addresses are
publicized on Twitter or elsewhere. They issue announcements on
www.anonops.blogspot.com , featuring information about the locations and
times of upcoming demonstrations supporting Assange in London or at a
local courthouse.

"PROTEST!" reads one headline on the Web site, announcing a
demonstration on Tuesday outside the Westminster Magistrates' Court in
London. "Julian Assange will be appearing at court for a bail hearing
please come and make your voice heard!"

On anonymousfreedom.org , members urge people to go on Reddit and focus
on particular countries: "We are, at the moment, particularly interested
in china and iran!" the site says, directing people to cables between
the State Department and overseas embassies regarding sales of Chinese
sales of weapons to Iran; or to Kenya against Somalia.

In England, the 26-year-old ad agency employee said he communicates with
fellow Anonymous members on hard-to-find Internet Relay Chat rooms where
hundreds of users can talk to one another without disclosing their
identities. The movement, he said, is inspired by many literary sources,
including science fiction writer Isaac Asimov and his "Foundations"
series about the future.

"The whole Asimov series is about the lack of transparency, but after
time, everything becomes clear," he said. "A lot of the people in
Anonymous have grown up with the Internet and see a future where the
Internet is cut back, where we have no net neutrality, and there are
different tiers of service and it isn't free to all.''

The English member of Anonymous guided a Post reporter to a chat room of
fellow members who had nicknames like "steerpike," "pheadanon" and
"Grommell."

There, on a collaborative site called Piratepad.net, Anonymous members
tapped out their reasons for defending WikiLeaks. "We've seen the power
the Internet can have in organizing the masses," one member said. "Look
at the protests in Iran. I fight for wikileaks because I don't want to
live in a future where people cannot talk about dissent without
attracting the notice of government bouncers in black suits."

Another person revealed a more ulterior motive in the Piratepad chat
room: "The most important result from doing these attacks is the media
exposure," the Anonymous member wrote. "It does provide somewhat of a
rush, and it is very empowering to note how many people are passionate
about their freedom. We are here for exposure, period, NOT damage."

shapirai at washpost.com warrickj at washpost.com

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism at lists.econ.utah.edu

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********