The assassination of Baitullah Mehsud

[Antid Oto]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

The assassination of Baitullah Mehsud

8 August 2009

The American political establishment and media, along with
Washington’s client government in Islamabad, are reveling in the
reports that missiles launched from an unmanned US Predator drone on
Wednesday killed 39-year-old Pakistani tribal leader Baitullah Mehsud
at his father-in-law’s residence in the agency of South Waziristan.

The descriptions of the Predator attack make clear that the Obama
administration ordered an act of mass murder. It was carried out in
the dead of night and with utter indifference to how many people were
killed.

According to sources from the Pakistani Express News channel, a
missile fired into the housing compound at 1 a.m. massacred seven of
the family’s bodyguards and 26 others, including the Taliban leader’s
young wife. Other accounts refer to dead and wounded children. Mehsud
himself was reportedly killed when a second missile was fired into the
car he was using in an attempt to escape.

The gloating in Washington and Islamabad has been somewhat restrained
because officials have not been able to definitively confirm that
Mehsud is dead. The area of South Waziristan in which the attack took
place is entirely under the control of the ethnic Pashtun Mehsud
tribal confederation.

Under Baitullah’s leadership, the Mehsuds and other Pashtun tribes
have defeated the Pakistani government’s attempts since 2004 to strip
them of the political autonomy they have enjoyed in the country’s
border region with Afghanistan since the days of the British Raj.

Mehsud’s murder is being justified by the White House and the
Pakistani government on the grounds that he was a “terrorist” and an
“Al Qaeda ally.” The subservient media has repeated such claims
uncritically. In reality, “terrorist” has become an all-purpose
catchword applied to all those who oppose US military occupation and
neo-colonial domination of their country.

Baitullah Mehsud was not a member of Al Qaeda, nor did he have any
involvement in terrorist attacks on the United States or other Western
countries. He was not directly involved in attacks across the border
on US and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

His crime is that he supported Afghan insurgents using the Pakistani
tribal agencies as safe havens for their guerilla war against the US
occupation of their country and opposed the US-backed regime in
Islamabad. The Pakistani Pashtun tribes have adhered to the same
policy they followed during the Soviet occupation in the 1980s,
providing assistance to fighters waging what they view as a legitimate
war by the Afghan people for liberation from foreign domination.

Before 2007, Baitullah Mehsud was barely known outside South
Waziristan. He emerged as a leader among the Mehsud tribe only after a
US air strike in 2004 killed Nek Mohammad, the tribal head who had led
the resistance to the initial offensive of Pakistani government troops
into Waziristan. Mehsud commanded the fighters who repulsed several
subsequent assaults that were ordered by the Islamabad government
under pressure from Washington—and in violation of truces that had
been signed with the Pashtun tribes.

In late 2007, Mehsud was named the overall leader of Tehrik-e-Taliban,
a new organisation formed to unify tribal and Islamist resistance to
the actions of the Pakistani government and assist the Afghan
Taliban’s struggle against the US-NATO occupation.

To justify operations against the Pakistani Taliban, the regime of
General Musharraf accused Mehsud of directing the assassination of
opposition leader Benazir Bhutto in December 2007. Mehsud
categorically denied any involvement in Bhutto’s killing. Over the
following years, however, he did claim responsibility for a series of
suicide bombings against military targets in various parts of
Pakistan, on the grounds they were retaliation for US and Pakistani
government air strikes in the tribal agencies.

The decision in Washington to target Baitullah Mehsud is the direct
outcome of the Obama administration’s re-focus on Afghanistan and its
escalation of the conflict into the so-called “AfPak War” on both
sides of the border. The Bush administration did not target Mehsud or
South Waziristan for attack by drone-launched missiles because
Mehsud’s forces were not involved in fighting in Afghanistan.

The Obama administration agreed to target Mehsud—intervening
militarily into the internal political situation of Pakistan—as a quid
pro quo for Pakistani President Zardari’s tacit support for US drone
attacks inside Pakistan and Islamabad’s agreement to launch military
offensives against insurgents in the Swat Valley and other areas near
the Afghan border.

In March, a price tag of $5 million was placed on the tribal leader’s
head. Predator drone operations were stepped up in Waziristan and
other tribal areas. According to the Dawn newspaper, whereas 34 were
attacks were carried out in 2008, Obama has already ordered 28 this
year, of which 19 were attempts to kill Mehsud or his chief
lieutenants. Hundreds of civilians have been killed in the process.

Mehsud’s assassination is emblematic of the criminal, reckless and
incendiary character of Obama’s war in Central Asia.

The Bush administration’s original justification for the invasion of
Afghanistan—to kill or capture Osama bin Laden and other Al Qaeda
leaders who ordered the September 11 attacks—has been dropped. The
attempts to portray the war as an effort to bring “democracy” to
Afghanistan have also fallen by the wayside, under conditions in which
up to half the country is in rebellion against the occupation and does
not accept the legitimacy of the US puppet regime headed by President
Hamid Karzai.

The war stands exposed as a bloody neo-colonial enterprise aimed at
ensuring US imperialism and its NATO allies’ strategic dominance over
the oil-rich Central Asian republics and curbing the influence of
other regional powers such China, Russia, India and Iran.

The resistance in Afghanistan and Pakistan is being answered by Obama
with more troops, death squads and collective punishment against the
civilian population. The result thus far has been the growth of the
insurgency. This year, 251 US and NATO troops have been killed,
compared with 294 in all 2008. In the first week of August, at least
19 have lost their lives.

What began nearly eight years ago with the overthrow of the Taliban
government in Afghanistan is now plunging nuclear-armed Pakistan
toward full-scale civil war. The military operations and
indiscriminate US killings in the tribal agencies have fuelled mass
anger toward the government.

After years of violence, large sections of the ethnic Pashtun
population view themselves as at war with Islamabad. Immediately
following the killing of Mehsud, the Pakistani military and police
threw up checkpoints and roadblocks throughout the capital and other
cities. Widespread retaliatory attacks for Mehsud’s death are
considered inevitable.

The majority of the population in every country that has troops
deployed in Afghanistan does not support the war, including the United
States. In contempt for the views of the public, Obama and his
international allies are escalating the occupation to dangerous new
dimensions. They are being aided by the erstwhile liberals and
middle-class pacifists, who have abandoned their opposition to war
with the coming to power of Obama.

The completely illegal targeted assassination of Mehsud can only
further inflame both the internal situation in Pakistan and conflicts
throughout Central Asia and beyond. US imperialist policy is
exacerbating tensions with China and Russia, and further destabilising
relations between the traditional foes Pakistan and India—both of
which possess nuclear weapons. Ultimately, the logic of US militarism
leads to a global conflagration.

The working class in the US and internationally, organised on a
socialist perspective, is the only social force that can put an end to
militarism and imperialist war. The very foundations of the capitalist
profit system must be overturned in order to eliminate the root cause
of crimes such as the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

James Cogan

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/aug2009/pers-a08.shtml

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********