Obama continues brutal immigrant detention policies

Antid Oto aorta at HOME.NL
Fri Aug 7 14:02:51 CEST 2009


REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

Obama continues brutal immigrant detention policies
By Jerry White
7 August 2009

The Obama administration announced plans Thursday to revamp the
federal immigration detention system in what is chiefly a cosmetic
effort to deflect criticism of the brutal and unconstitutional
treatment meted out by the government to tens of thousands of
immigrants awaiting deportation.

Insofar as there is any actual content to the announced measures, it
will mean a greater centralization of the “civil detention” system and
a more efficient and accelerated means to track, process and deport
undocumented immigrants. This has dangerous implications for the
democratic rights of not only immigrants, but also native-born Americans.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE, part of the
Department of Homeland Security) officials announced the creation of a
new office to oversee the system of 350 local jails,
private-for-profit prisons and federal detention centers that the
government contracts or operates. The system holds some 31,000
immigrants at any given time, and up to 400,000 persons each year.

According to the National Immigration Law Center, these numbers have
steadily increased, from 6,259 in 1992, to approximately 20,000 in
early 2006, to the current figure of 31,000. The growth in the number
of immigrant detainees is due to increased immigration raids at homes
and workplaces, policies that make deporting even lawful permanent
residents easier and a requirement that all immigrants, including
asylum seekers, be detained before they are deported.

Far from breaking with the reactionary policies of the Bush
administration, President Obama has expanded and accelerated them.
Last week Janet Napolitano, the secretary of Homeland Security, said
she expected the number of detainees to stay the same or grow in the
next period.

Announcing the administration’s new plans Thursday, ICE Assistant
Secretary John Morton said: “This isn’t about whether or not we are
going to detain people. We are going to continue to detain people on a
large scale. This is about how we detain those people.”

Obama has made clear that he will continue the “zero tolerance” policy
in charging and jailing undocumented immigrants crossing the
Mexican-US border and will resume construction of an $8 billion
high-tech “virtual” fence along the border. The White House is also
vastly expanding the Bush administration’s program to identify and
deport undocumented immigrants held in local jails.

Under the program, known as Secure Communities, virtually all people
booked in local jails—even for the most minor offenses—will have their
immigration status checked for the next four years. Previously, they
could only be checked for a criminal history in the FBI database. If a
person is found to be undocumented, they will face deportation as well
as criminal charges.

The Obama administration is spending millions of dollars to expand the
program—which now operates in San Diego, Phoenix, Dallas, Miami and
Durham, North Carolina—into a nationwide dragnet against immigrants by
2012. In addition, the administration is augmenting a program to check
the immigration status of workers, which was widely criticized during
the Bush administration.

In announcing its new guidelines, the Obama administration has once
again rejected appeals from immigrant rights groups to establish
legally binding rules on the conditions in immigrant detention
centers. Previous non-binding “standards” introduced in 2000 and 2008
have done nothing to stop the brutal treatment, and no one has been
held accountable. In fact, state and local governments—which hold
two-thirds of all immigrant detainees under contracts with the federal
government—are explicitly exempt from even these toothless standards.

Those incarcerated in the jails, prisons and detention centers face a
Kafkaesque maze—away from public view—where they have little or no
legal rights and are subjected to treatment, which, in many cases, are
as bad as or worse than in the criminal justice system. Little is ever
known about the conditions and fate of the detainees, except when
periodic news reports cover hunger strikes, riots or the deaths of
immigrants who were denied medical care while in custody.

The federal government refuses to allow public access to its internal
reports on detention facilities or reviews by the American Bar
Association (ABA) and the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR), both of which have been given access to facilities
on the condition that their reports are shared only with ICE.

The National Immigration Law Center, however, provided a glimpse of
these conditions through a lawsuit that forced the ICE to report
violations of its own standards that occurred in 2001-2005. The
report, entitled “A Broken System”, details physical abuse by guards,
long periods of punitive “segregation,” including in so-called hold
rooms, where detainees were isolated and denied sanitary conditions
and access to health care. Others were arbitrarily transferred to
different centers, taking them away from their loved ones and
attorneys, and interrupting their medical care, sometimes with fatal
consequences.

In addition, detainees were denied visits by family and legal
advocates, deprived of outdoor recreation and access to lists of local
pro bono attorneys to fight their deportations. Phone calls and mail
was restricted, with legal phone calls monitored by guards.

One of the most notorious cases involved the T. Don Hutto Residential
Center, a former state prison near Austin, Texas, which was run for
profit by the Corrections Corporation of America under a $2.8 million
monthly federal contract. The facility, which holds entire families,
was a target of a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union.
Children under the age of ten were held for as long as a year, mainly
confined to family cells with open toilets, with only one hour of
schooling each day. Other children were threatened with separation
from their parents and were held behind razor wire.

As a public relations concession, administration officials said Hutto
would no longer hold families and would be restricted to holding
female detainees only. They also announced their intention—in the next
three to five years—to move detainees into non-prison facilities and
“ensure appropriate conditions” throughout the system.

“Only time will tell if the reforms announced today amount to lasting
change or simply creative repackaging of prior policies,” said Karen
Tumlin of the National Immigration Law Center. She complained that,
just like the old standards, the new ones proposed by the Obama
administration are not enforceable by law.

Vanita Gupta, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who led the
lawsuit against the Hutto center, said: “The ending of family
detention at Hutto is welcome news and long overdue. However, without
independently enforceable standards...or basic due process before
people are locked up, it is hard to see how the government’s proposed
overhaul of the immigration detention system is anything other than a
reorganization or renaming of what was in place before.”

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/aug2009/dete-a07.shtml

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********



More information about the D66 mailing list