[D66] The Shadow of Autocracy: Trump’s Authoritarian Project

[René Oudeweg]

["Dictatorship in America will not appear in jackboots and parades, but 
in the quiet normalization of loyalty tests, the weaponization of state 
power, and the systematic silencing of dissent." ]

## The Shadow of Autocracy: Trump’s Authoritarian Project

In the contemporary American moment, the very question of whether 
democracy is resilient or fragile has become inescapable. Donald J. 
Trump’s return to the center of political life has amplified that 
question with an urgency that is difficult to overstate. His rhetoric, 
his actions in office, and his present designs on the machinery of state 
all suggest not merely an unorthodox presidency, but a calculated 
assault on constitutional norms. The evidence compels a warning: Trump 
is not merely a populist outsider railing against elites—he is engaged 
in the gradual construction of a system that resembles dictatorship.

### The Erosion of Norms and the Personalization of Power

Dictatorship does not arrive in a single moment of rupture. It is rarely 
announced with the clarity of a coup. Rather, it emerges in the 
corrosion of the ordinary. During Trump’s presidency, the consolidation 
of personal power was pursued with vigor: the dismissal of officials who 
failed to show “loyalty,” the deployment of executive power as a tool of 
personal vendetta, and the systematic devaluation of independent 
institutions such as the Department of Justice and the intelligence 
community. The governing philosophy was stark: the state exists to serve 
the ruler, not the citizenry.

Trump’s narrative is not merely anti-elite but anti-institutional. 
Judges who rule against him are “enemies.” Journalists are “the enemy of 
the people.” Electoral outcomes are valid only when they favor him. This 
language lays the discursive foundation for autocracy: it delegitimizes 
pluralism and replaces it with a politics of loyalty and submission.

### The Weaponization of Conspiracy and the Cult of the Leader

The authoritarian playbook requires a unifying myth, and Trump has 
chosen the myth of the “stolen America”—an imagined golden age undone by 
traitorous elites, immigrants, and globalists. This myth not only 
rationalizes his failures but also mobilizes followers with a sense of 
existential grievance. The “stolen election” narrative of 2020 
exemplifies this: despite conclusive evidence to the contrary, Trump 
persuaded millions of citizens that the electoral process itself was 
fraudulent.

This dynamic is familiar to students of authoritarianism. When political 
reality becomes intolerable to the leader’s ambitions, reality is 
replaced with myth. What follows is a cult of personality, wherein the 
leader’s word supersedes fact, law, and reason. January 6, 2021, was not 
merely a riot but the manifestation of this substitution of loyalty for 
legality.

### The Institutional Capture of a Second Term

The gravest danger lies not in Trump’s past but in his potential future. 
Reports from his advisors and political allies reveal a blueprint for a 
second administration that would complete what the first began: purging 
the federal bureaucracy, subordinating independent agencies to White 
House control, and installing personal loyalists in every node of state 
power. This is not speculation but open declaration. Projects such as 
“Schedule F”—a plan to strip civil service protections from thousands of 
federal workers—would enable the wholesale politicization of the 
administrative state.

History teaches that democratic collapse often begins with precisely 
such institutional capture. Courts that cease to check executive 
ambition, legislatures reduced to rubber stamps, and bureaucracies 
transformed into patronage networks—all are classic instruments of 
authoritarian consolidation. The United States, once thought immune to 
such degeneration, now finds itself perilously close to this path.

### The American Precedent and the Global Context

Skeptics argue that the Constitution is strong, that American democracy 
has withstood wars, depressions, and internal conflict. Yet such 
confidence overlooks the fragility of liberal institutions under 
sustained assault. The Weimar Republic, after all, had a constitution 
often praised for its sophistication, yet it was dismantled from within. 
Hungary and Turkey, once celebrated as democratic success stories, have 
in recent decades succumbed to illiberal strongmen using legal means to 
entrench dictatorial rule.

Trump’s ambitions align with this global trend of “autocratic 
legalism”—the use of law to hollow out liberty, and the use of elections 
to mask the erosion of genuine choice. The ballot box becomes a ritual, 
not a safeguard.

### Conclusion: Vigilance as the Price of Freedom

The warning is stark but necessary: Trump’s project is not one of 
ordinary conservative governance but of authoritarian consolidation. The 
stakes, therefore, are not partisan but existential. To dismiss the 
danger as hyperbolic is to ignore the lessons of history. Dictatorship 
in America will not appear in jackboots and parades, but in the quiet 
normalization of loyalty tests, the weaponization of state power, and 
the systematic silencing of dissent.

What remains to be seen is whether American civil society, its 
institutions, and its citizens can muster the vigilance required to 
defend the republic. The specter of dictatorship is no longer an 
abstraction; it is a looming possibility. The task is clear: to resist 
it before the republic itself becomes a relic of memory.

---