[D66] On Materialism and the Big Annihilation

[RO]

Wed 18 Aug 2010 08∶06∶00 PM CEST


--


        On Materialism and the Big Annihilation.


Matter in the Universe has existed forever and will probably exist 
forever if we don’t find a way to annihilate matter once and for all.


Scientific pundits will say matter can not be destroyed only 
transformed. This is not something I can be satisfied with. There is no 
justification for the existence of matter and its mode of existence: 
time and space. Is the void love a reason for existence of matter? No. 
If we look up the sky we see the remains of a catastrophe, and this 
catastrophe called matter should cease to exist in a zero-endpoint ʊ 
where all matter will be annihilated. Not the Big Shrink, but the *Big 
Annihilation*. After the B.A. the mode of existence of matter, time and 
space will cease to exist forever. No cyclical Big Bang is possible, 
since there was no Big Bang in the first place. As a firm atheist I deny 
the B.B. and creationism. As a materialist I confirm the existence of 
that matter and its dialectical laws, things (matter) are out there, 
something Berkeley would certainly deny.


Einstein said E=Mc^2 , but Abian stated equivalence of time and mass, 
and that time has inertia. My hypothesis is that time has inertia ending 
in ʊ. This eschatological endpoint is the only hope we can hold on to as 
dialectical anti-materialist materialists. Not the heat-death of the 
universe will bring salvation but the complete /aufhebung/of time and 
space, the mode of existence of matter. After ʊ not even the void 
exists. No single atom remains. What remains is everything transformed 
in nothing. Nothing is hard to define and I will not do a wild guess.

Nothing is not space or a vacuum. This nothing I refer to is not 
convertible in everything, say a B.B. It is a one-way dialectical 
/aufhebung/only.


When both matter and anti-matter is negated in the final /aufhebung/, 
its mode of existence is not preserved but annihilated to prevent any 
trace of its origin. Since the origin’s footprint might leave the 
possibility open for its reversal. Since the universe has no origin, our 
zero-endpoint ʊ has no origin either, except for number theory. The 
ultimate fate of our universe is intrinsically (and hermetically) linked 
with number theory. This is my second thesis. Our universe is one big 
number cruncher. If the universe has existed forever why hasn’t it 
already crunched all atoms/numbers? Because ʊ hasn’t been reached yet. 
The fact that I can write this, testifies for it.


My third thesis is that the distribution of the non-trivial zeros of the 
Riemann ζ function follows dialectical laws, and that it has one supreme 
exception (real part is not ½). I believe therefore that the Riemann 
hypothesis is false.


But, you say, isn’t this Nihilism? Nietzsche /ohne/ Nietzsche, Hegel 
/ohne/ Hegel, Riemann /ohne/ Riemann? Yes, its absolute Nihilism and one 
can be proud of this. In no way I want to be associated with this 
catastrophe called our material universe! Every living, non-living 
idealistic or materialist manifestations should cease to exist!


        Bring ʊ forward!


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tuxtown.net/pipermail/d66/attachments/20220508/f7ae6c87/attachment.html>