[D66] Plan C
A.O.
jugg at ziggo.nl
Mon Mar 13 14:19:09 CET 2017
http://www.weareplanc.org/about/
http://www.weareplanc.org/blog/
Where did Plan C come from?
Good question! Some of our members in Leeds were interviewed by the
Interventionist Left – a radical organisation in Germany – in 2012 about
Plan C’s origins and practice. Whilst not all of it is up to date and
the politics of Plan C are always evolving it does provide a useful
overview of the origins of our organisation. To find out more about our
current activity you can see our events page, blog or get in touch with us.
1. Plan C is quite an unusual name for a leftist organisation. What does
it stand for?
The ‘C’ is deliberately ambiguous. The assumption tends to be that it
stands for ‘Commons’ or ‘Communism’. Either of these is acceptable but
people should feel free to interpret it differently if they wish. It
also has the advantage of sounding a little like the title of a 1950s
American ‘red scare’ thriller. More importantly, it’s a play on the
flurry of discourse around ‘Plan A’ and ‘Plan B’ that emerged in the UK
once the crisis had dug its heels in after 2007.
At the end of 2009, in a now-classic statement, the prime minister’s
spokesperson told us “It is quite normal for government officials to be
thinking about alternative scenarios [but] ministers haven’t asked for
advice on ‘plan B’ because they are very clear that the plan we have is
the right plan.” This plan, Plan A, is the plan that involves massive
cuts to public spending, tripling of university fees, the ‘remodeling’
of labour and environmental policy, and tax breaks for the wealthy. In
short, a neo-liberal plan focused on making Britain more
‘business-friendly’. Of course, just because ministers hadn’t gone
looking for a plan B doesn’t mean no one else did.
There are numerous Plan B’s. Some better than others, but all of them
hovering in the vicinity of some form or other of neokeynesianism. We
don’t want to unhelpfully dismiss these plan Bs out of hand. We think
it’s exciting so many people seem to be questioning the ‘present state
of things’ and thinking about alternatives. However, it is crucially
important to note the absence of the same social and material conditions
that ushered in the golden age of social democracy in the past. In the
light of this, the Plan B(s), being called for by everyone from
pragmatic capitalist economists to left revolutionary parties, seem
little more than pie in the sky. So, we suggest a new plan, Plan C
(perhaps centred on commons). We have no desire to present this plan as
a prognosis; one of the problems with plan B after all is its inability
to meet the dynamism and flux of everyday life under capitalism. We need
plans that can change, rapidly if need be. We do however, see this plan
as being centred on how we organise our social reproduction. The focus
on the question of organisation that this necessarily engenders is
another aspect of the name. We want to go beyond the plans A and B of
political organizing.
More information about the D66
mailing list