[D66] Why is Philosophy sick?
Nord
protocosmos66 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 15:52:43 CEST 2013
http://crestondavis.wordpress.com/2013/08/25/1882/
WHY IS PHILOSOPHY SICK?
Posted on August 25, 2013 by crestondavis
Creston Davis is Professor of Philosophy at the Institute of Humanities
and Social Sciences, Skopje. He is the coauthor (with John Milbank and
Slavoj Zizek) of Paul’s New Moment: Continental Philosophy and the
Future of Christian Theology; coeditor (with John Milbank and Slavoj
Zizek) of Theology and the Political: The New Debate; editor of John
Milbank and Slavoj Zizek The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or
Dialectic? and author of the forthcoming novel, Ghostly Icons. He has
recently co-founded, The Global Center for Advanced Studies.
Creston Davis
What is wrong with philosophy today? On the face of it, unlike other
disciplines in the academy, the very nature of philosophy inherently
resists a foolproof definition. Of course that’s not to say it hasn’t
been defined. From the birth of the academy in both ancient Greece and
the Middle Ages, philosophy has always been at the heart of any
education worthy of its name. For example, when I was an undergraduate
at Oxford this lesson became eminently clear when I stood in the center
of the Bodleian library quadrangle (1613-1619) and the Tower of the Five
Orders from which four of the main exit doors were devoted to the core
subjects that comprise philosophy: Schola Metaphysicae, Schola Naturalis
Philosophiae, Schola Moralis Philosophiae, and Schola Logicae.
Philosophy, in other words, was irrefutably foundational to the very
existence of university education. When you compare this to the
contemporary academy that purports to be devoted to the liberal arts
(i.e., the arts that free us vis-à-vis the servile arts, such as pluming
and business) you would be lucky to locate a department that does not
reduce philosophy to little more than business ethics. This raises the
question: What’s wrong with philosophy especially if its nature is
completely unrecognizable within university settings today?
One explanation is that it’s simply outdated, and like modern theology
will dissolve into the dustbins of history out of sheer irrelevance.
Philosophy, so this stance believes, is antiquated because it is
redundant as it only teaches students ancient techniques of logical
thinking and analyses, which, so administrators argue, can easily be
acquired in a single humanities course.
The problem with this explanation is that it misconstrues philosophy by
reducing it to an anemic skill sets all made relevant if and only if
they enhance a student’s ability to get a job. So it is not difficult
to see why philosophy is dying (along with the humanities) because it is
inversely related to the dogma of corporate culture. Moreover, this
trend has the unfortunate consequence of forcing philosophers to create
courses that are relevant to getting a job. In short, philosophy
becomes enslave to corporate culture.
But should philosophy fold so easily to this prosaic corporate
totalitarianism that has subverted all non-corporate methods of thinking
and practice? Think of the two basic functions in which the academy has
traditionally served a free democratic society: one is negative and the
other positive. The negative service provides free and independent
critiques of the inevitable abuses of power (both political and
economic) that threatened the security of a democratic society. And as
the corporate financial crisis in 2008 proved beyond a shadow of doubt
unchecked greed threatens the founding truths of democracy: of life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Seen in this way, independent
journalists and filmmakers also provide this “watch-dog” service
protecting us from the abuses of barbaric greed mongering. This is why
a professor’s tenure was so crucial because they were protected and
could thus publish their independent and objective research
recommendations without fear of being fired.
On the positive side, academia once served a free society through its
independent research that can give genuinely new and creative solutions
to the rudimentary problems facing our planet such as, among many other
problems, ecological sustainability, imperialist power, and the waging
of unjust wars. For example, an independent professor would recommend
solutions to obverting ecological catastrophes by inventing new energy,
economic, and political possibilities in order to avoid totalitarian
greed from taking hold like the kind that corporate capitalism has
installed in the United States in the 21st Century. And this does not
even touch one the psychological tyranny that the government and
employers use when they violate our basic privacy rights by monitoring
our intimate conversations from our mobile phones, to our emails and
other social networking communications.
This gets us back to the question: What’s wrong with philosophy today?
Why is it sick? Pondering this it becomes clear from the above analysis
that the problem with philosophy is that it has forgotten it original
modus operandi namely, the freedom to arrive at solutions to our
existential situation. This is why philosophy must live into its truth
so that it can arrive at new possibilities and alternative worlds
unencumbered by the political and economic tyrannical powers that seek
to protect their own interests at the cost of enslaving the majority of
the population to the servile arts (i.e., enslavement to making money).
And here I’m not even mentioning governmental and corporate
surveillance on the populous. This is why philosophy’s genius is found
in its infinite procedure, and this is because the ability to think,
act, and invent is infinite in nature (i.e., free) which is why
philosophers from Heraclitus to Diogenes, and from Socrates, Plato and
Aristotle couldn’t draw a hard and fast demarcations between the
disciplines distilled in the modern academy we see today from economics
to politics to ethics. And the reason for this is because the
disciplines were all grounded in living a life for freedom and justice
geared toward the search for wisdom and truth, and not, as is the case
today, where everyone is taught to seek out their own wealth at the cost
of dissolving social unity.
The illness of philosophy today is all too evident when viewed as a
discipline that is wholly enslaved to the corporatized academy. That
is, the academy has become an extension of the corporate workforce
precisely because the latter has determined not only what subjects are
taught but also how those subjects are taught. In other words, the
corporate world has literally redefined the learning and discovery
process thus undermining new and creative ways of thinking and living
that would provide us with a healthier peaceful future.
Therefore, the days of an independent academy as the watchdog over
potential totalitarian regimes are over. This is especially evident
with the recent publication of a “major report” in the New York Times in
which professors argue that the humanities are worth saving basically
because they teach students the skills essential to getting a job in the
corporate world. You know it’s over when humanities professors gut and
sacrifice their subjects to the god of capitalism.
In light of this, it is now time to return to philosophy’s true nature
devoted to freedom and justice for all. Perhaps embodying a “Robin Hood
pedagogical ethic” in educational process might be one means of stealing
from the rich and giving a life back to the poor. And what would a
professor or teacher steal exactly? It would steal back the possibility
of freedom that has been hijacked from our youth preventing them from
exploring alternatives futures other than the greed of capitalism, which
turns our students into monsters. It is time to free philosophy and the
other subjects in the humanities from the chains of the corporate world
and the administrators and lawyers who peddle them. The fact that
philosophy remains indefinable to the bane of many gives us hope that
this revolution is already afoot and that is taking place concretely by
the opening of a independent graduate and post-graduate school, The
Global Center for Advanced Studies.
More information about the D66
mailing list