Dutch government collapses over military deployment in Afghanistan

[Antid Oto]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

Dutch government collapses over military deployment in Afghanistan
By Stefan Steinberg
22 February 2010

The Dutch government collapsed on Saturday when one member of the
ruling coalition—the social democratic Dutch Labour Party
(PvdA)—refused to support a further extension of the country’s
military deployment in Afghanistan.

The Labour Party, which has shared power with the Christian Democrats
and the Christian Union, argued in making its decision that the
party’s credibility was at stake.

The Labour Party has lost considerable support in recent elections due
in large measure to its continued support for Dutch military
involvement in Afghanistan. Commenting on his party’s decision to
oppose a new mandate, Labour Party leader and Deputy Prime Minister
Wouter Bos complained that the intervention was placing “a very heavy
burden on the Dutch armed forces.”

He continued: “When we extended [the mandate for the Dutch military
deployment in Afghanistan] two years ago, we made a promise to the
Dutch population that this was the last time. So it wouldn’t have been
very credible if we had changed the date again.”

The Netherlands currently has 1,400 troops stationed in the southern
Afghan province of Uruzgan. Its total troop numbers in Afghanistan are
estimated at about 2,000.

Twenty-one Dutch soldiers have been killed since the government first
sent troops to back the NATO mission in 2006. Opinion polls have
repeatedly made clear that a majority of the population is opposed to
the Afghan deployment and favours the immediate withdrawal of Dutch
troops. Against this background, the Dutch government had set a
deadline for the withdrawal of its troops by August of this year.

In the last few months, the US and Britain have increased their
pressure on the Dutch government in The Hague to renew its military
commitment in Uruzgan. The increased deployment of European troops is
a cornerstone of the surge strategy decided upon by the Obama
administration, which has dispatched tens of thousands of additional
US troops to Afghanistan.

The US originally sought up to 10,000 additional troops from Europe.
In response, NATO pledged to provide around 7,000 troops, but this
total includes some troops already in the country, and many European
governments have failed to make firm commitments on the full
contingents promised.

Public opposition to the military policy of the Dutch government and
the involvement of Dutch troops in Afghanistan increased at the start
of the year following the release of a report by a Dutch commission of
inquiry into the 2003 Iraq war. The Davids Commission rejected the
central arguments used to justify the actions of the US and British
governments and concluded that the Iraq war was illegal under
international law. The report was also critical of the role played in
the Iraq war by the Dutch government led by the Christian Democratic
prime minister, Peter Balkenende, who heads the now-collapsed coalition.

At the start of this month, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh
Rasmussen held talks with Maxime Verhagen, the Christian Democratic
foreign minister, and then pleaded in a letter to Balkenende for an
extension of the Dutch mission.

In response to the NATO secretary general’s request, the Dutch Labour
Party proffered an olive branch. Labour MP Martijn van Dam declared
that his party would be prepared to support a continued intervention
involving the training of Afghan engineers or medical personnel on a
limited scale. Since Dutch troops would be necessary to ensure the
security of such a mission, van Dam’s proposal was a backhanded way of
permitting the Dutch deployment to continue.

However, after news broke last week of the NATO negotiations to extend
the Dutch deployment, public anger swelled. Bos claimed not to have
known about the talks—a highly dubious assertion that was discounted
by the Christian Democrats, who insisted Bos was fully informed, and
widely disbelieved by the public.

This was the context in which the Labour Party broke ranks with its
coalition partners. At the end of a 16-hour cabinet meeting that
lasted into the early hours of Saturday, Balkenende declared the
termination of his coalition with the Labour Party.

The Christian Democratic and Christian Union parties are expected to
form a caretaker government until a fresh general election takes
place, probably in early summer. Under conditions where all of the
coalition parties have been discredited, it is believed that the
ultra-right anti-immigrant Freedom Party of Geert Wilders could win or
finish second in new legislative elections.

The collapse of the Dutch government represents a serious blow to the
US administration’s strategy in Afghanistan. While the number of Dutch
troops in Afghanistan pales in comparison to the US deployment—set to
reach nearly 100,000 by the end of the year—political pundits and
foreign policy specialists fear that the Dutch decision could be the
preamble to other countries deciding to quit.

The German parliament is due to decide on an extension of the mandate
for its own troops in Afghanistan on Friday. In common with the
Netherlands, there is massive public opposition to the involvement of
German troops in the US-NATO mission.

According to Julian Lindley-French, professor of defense strategy at
the Netherlands Defense Academy in Breda: “If the Dutch go, which is
the implication of all this, that could open the floodgates for other
Europeans to say, ‘The Dutch are going, we can go, too.’ The
implications are that the US and the British are going to take on more
of the load.”

The collapse of the Dutch government and prospect of a withdrawal of
Dutch troops also comes at a point when the US-NATO alliance is
confronting increasing resistance in its operation against the Taliban
in Helmand province, which neighbours the province of Uruzgan.

The comments by Labour Party leader Wouter Bos following the
withdrawal of his party from the coalition government make clear that
the social democrats have no differences regarding the use of Dutch
troops for military interventions in the pursuit of Dutch interests.
Bos represents a section of the ruling elite in the Netherlands which
is increasingly concerned over the course of the Afghan campaign,
chafes at the use of Dutch troops to pursue American interests in the
region, and fears the domestic social and political consequences of
continued Dutch involvement in the war.

Popular opposition to the war is linking up with social discontent
over the impact of the economic crisis and government austerity moves.
Balkenende had announced plans to raise the retirement age and impose
sweeping cuts in social programs in order to recoup the huge sums
allocated by the government to rescue Dutch banks at the height of the
economic crisis.

As in the case of military policy, the social democrats have no
fundamental differences with such policies. Since the 1990s, the
Labour Party has been regarded as the party of wealth
redistribution—from the working class to those at the top of society.

In was during this time that the PvdA, under then-Prime Minister Wim
Kok, undertook a drastic program of cuts in welfare state programs,
thereby paving the way for the accession to power of the conservatives
under Balkenende. Current Labour Party leader Bos is a former top
manager of Shell Oil and has close connections to the Dutch business
world.

Now, Bos and the leadership of the Labour Party have concluded that
the measures necessary to restore the credit worthiness of the
Netherlands in the eyes of international finance cannot be carried out
by the discredited Balkenende coalition. Instead, the Labour Party
will seek to exploit its close links to the trade unions to forge a
new coalition pledged to implement the cuts demanded by the banks and
Dutch corporate interests.

http://wsws.org/articles/2010/feb2010/neth-f22.shtml

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********