Obama ’s “Mission Accomplished”

[Antid Oto]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

Obama’s “Mission Accomplished”
20 August 2010

The White House and the Pentagon, assisted by a servile media, have hyped
Thursday’s exit of a single Stryker brigade from Iraq as the end of the “combat
mission” in that country, echoing the ill-fated claim made by George W. Bush
seven years ago.

Obama is more skillful in packaging false propaganda than Bush, and no doubt has
learned something from the glaring mistakes of his predecessor. Bush landed on
the deck of the US aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln on May 1, 2003 to
proclaim—under a banner reading “Mission Accomplished”—that “major combat
operations” in Iraq were over. A captive audience of naval enlisted personnel
was assembled on deck as cheering extras.

Obama wisely did not fly to Kuwait to deliver a similar address from atop an
armored vehicle. He merely issued a statement from the White House, while
leaving the heavy lifting to the television networks and their “embedded”
reporters, who accompanied the brigade across the border into Kuwait and
repeated the propaganda line fashioned by the administration and the military brass.

When Bush delivered his speech, a total of 139 US troops had been killed. Nearly
4,300 more have died since. Iraq, mauled by the “shock and awe” bombardment and
invasion of March 2003, was turned into a slaughterhouse, with estimates of over
a million lives lost as a result of the US war, many more wounded, some four
million people turned into homeless refugees and thousands imprisoned and
tortured in US-run detention centers like Abu Ghraib.

Violence in Iraq last month rose to its highest level in the past two years. The
carnage over recent weeks will likely drive the Iraqi death toll even higher for
August. Indeed, the logistics surrounding the withdrawal of the Stryker
brigade—with F-16s and helicopter gunships providing air support and reporters
sworn to secrecy about its timing and route—testifies to the continued threat
posed by the Iraqi insurgency.

As for the Iraqis themselves, the intervening years have only deepened a social
and humanitarian catastrophe. More than half of the population is either
unemployed or underemployed, nearly a quarter lives below the miserable poverty
line of $2.20 a day, and most Iraqis lack access to clean water, adequate
sanitation, decent housing, health care and all but sporadic electricity.

It is this bloody and criminal legacy that makes Obama’s more discreet
statements even more obscene than the stage-managed bravado of his predecessor.

“Our combat mission will end this month, and we will complete a substantial
drawdown of our troops,” wrote Obama in his statement Wednesday. “And,
consistent with our agreement with the Iraqi government, all of our troops will
be out of Iraq by the end of next year.”

He proclaimed the exit of the 4th Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division as a
“milestone” in the ending of the US military intervention in Iraq.

The US media has embellished these brief remarks with a flag-waving celebration
of American militarism, combined with potted historic retrospectives that manage
to obscure the fact that from the outset this has been a war of aggression—a war
crime—that was forced upon the American people with lies about nonexistent
“weapons of mass destruction” and Iraq-Al Qaeda connections.

In his statement, Obama repeated his standard formulation about his
determination to “end the war in Iraq responsibly.” He was not referring to any
responsibility to the American people. They voted for him largely out of the
mistaken belief that he would end this war, which the latest polls indicate is
opposed by a better than two-to-one margin. On the contrary, he is acting
“responsibly” to secure the aims and interests of the US corporate and financial
aristocracy, which embraced military aggression as a means of pursuing its
global interests, particularly by laying hold of the oil-rich Persian Gulf and
Central Asia.

Obama was a bit more effusive at a Democratic fundraiser in Columbus, Ohio
Wednesday, telling his audience: “We’re keeping the promise that we’ve made when
I began my campaign for the presidency. By the end of this month…our combat
mission will be over in Iraq.”

This short statement strings together a series of lies. The present partial
withdrawal of US troops is not the promise Obama made during his presidential
campaign, which was to withdraw all US combat troops from Iraq within 16 months.
The timetable for which he is now claiming credit was set by his Republican
predecessor, George W. Bush, as part of a status of forces agreement (SOFA)
reached with the Baghdad regime in 2008.

The timing of the withdrawal aside, Obama’s campaign promise to withdraw all
combat brigades from Iraq was jettisoned in favor of leaving 50,000 US troops in
Iraq until the end of 2011—again the Bush plan embodied in the SOFA. These
remaining brigades are indistinguishable from the one that crossed into Kuwait
Thursday. They have merely been rebranded as “transitional” troops, who are now
supposedly in Iraq merely to “advise and assist,” but have the full capacity to
conduct combat operations.

US planes and attack helicopters continue to control Iraq’s skies and will
continue to do so long after December 2011, the supposed deadline for a full
withdrawal of US forces. And Special Forces remain in place to carry out
counterinsurgency warfare and “targeted” killings.

No one in the military or foreign policy establishment believes that the
December 2011 deadline will see a withdrawal of all US forces. US diplomatic
envoys are pressuring Iraqi factions to break the five-month logjam in cobbling
together a coalition government precisely so a US puppet regime can “request”
American troops to remain longer.

At the same time, as the New York Times reported Thursday, the US State
Department is implementing plans to field its own army of up to 7,000 civilian
“security contractors.” These mercenaries are to man colonial-style fortress
bases and organize “quick reaction forces,” using military gear that the State
Department has asked the Pentagon to leave in place.

The Times quoted an unnamed administration official who acknowledged that
military commanders are advocating that as many as 10,000 US troops remain in
Iraq after the end of 2011. “The administration does not want to touch this
question right now,” the official said. “It runs counter to their political
argument that we are getting out of these messy places.”

In other words, with popular opposition to the ongoing wars in both Iraq and
Afghanistan growing, the Obama administration is trying to divert public opinion
with an orchestrated media event portrayed as the end of the “combat mission” in
Iraq.

It is no such thing. To serve the same predatory ends that motivated the illegal
war in the first place, the military occupation, the killing and the dying in
Iraq, will continue.

If the Obama administration has withdrawn 90,000 troops from Iraq—while leaving
50,000 in place—it is in order to shift military resources. It has tripled the
size of the US expeditionary force in Afghanistan, which will rise to nearly
100,000 within the next few weeks in preparation for a military offensive that
will claim the lives of thousands more Afghan civilians as well as hundreds more
US troops.

Moreover, the logic of these two wars is inexorably paving the way to a third
war. In both Iraq and Afghanistan, Washington is making increasing complaints
that Iranian influence stands as an impediment to the US achieving its strategic
aims in the Persian Gulf and Central Asia.

Behind the media flag-waving and triumphalism accompanying the fraudulent “end
of combat” in Iraq, even bloodier conflicts are being prepared. Stopping them
and forcing a withdrawal of all US troops from Iraq and Afghanistan can be
achieved only by the American working class mobilizing its independent political
strength against the Obama administration and the militarist policies and profit
interests it defends.

Bill Van Auken

http://wsws.org/articles/2010/aug2010/pers-a20.shtml

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********