<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#f9f9fa">
<p>NOg eentje dan uit het archief:<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Subject: abstracte vrijheid (2)<br>
From: Nord <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:protocosmos@home.nl"><protocosmos@home.nl></a><br>
Date: 4/15/13, 17:51<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://pitr.net/an/words/dutch/existence">http://pitr.net/an/words/dutch/existence</a><br>
Anagrams for 'existence'<br>
scène exit is anagram voor existence<br>
scene exit is anagram voor existence<br>
exces tien is anagram voor existence<br>
exces niet is anagram voor existence<br>
exces Tine is anagram voor existence<br>
cités exen is anagram voor existence<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://pitr.net/an/words/british-english/existence">http://pitr.net/an/words/british-english/existence</a><br>
existence is an anagram of existence<br>
tines exec is an anagram of existence<br>
tine's exec is an anagram of existence<br>
stein exec is an anagram of existence<br>
scene exit is an anagram of existence<br>
nites exec is an anagram of existence<br>
nite's exec is an anagram of existence<br>
inset exec is an anagram of existence<br>
execs tine is an anagram of existenceexecs nite is an anagram of
existence<br>
exec's tine is an anagram of existence<br>
exec's nite is an anagram of existence<br>
Stine exec is an anagram of existence<br>
Stein exec is an anagram of existence<br>
-------------------------<br>
Subject: Towards a New Concept of Existence<br>
From: Nord <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:protocosmos@home.nl"><protocosmos@home.nl></a><br>
Date: 4/15/13, 17:57<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lacan.com/symptom12/?p=116">http://lacan.com/symptom12/?p=116</a><br>
Towards a New Concept of Existence<br>
Alain Badiou</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Tonight I am not going to engage in any kind of criticism.
Instead, I intend to propose a new<br>
concept of existence. And I shall be as abstract as this intention
forces me to be. You can find a<br>
less arid but not complete exposition in a chapter of my
“Briefings on Existence,” and a complete<br>
one in my last book, Logiques des mondes, which is out in French
and will be published in English<br>
at the end of next year, I hope.<br>
As all of you know perfectly well, the fundamental problem is to
distinguish on the one hand, being<br>
as such, being qua being, and, on the other hand, existence, as a
category which precisely is not<br>
reducible to that of being. It is the heart of the matter. This
difference between being and existence<br>
is often the result of the consideration of a special type of
being. It is the case for Heidegger, with<br>
the distinction between Sein and Dasein. If we take into account
the etymological framework, we<br>
can see that “existence,” which depends on Dasein, is a
topological concept. It means to be here, to<br>
be in the world. And in fact, I also shall propose to determine
the very general concept of<br>
“existence” by the necessity of thinking the place, or the world,
of everything which is. And this<br>
place is not deducible from being as such.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>