<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#f9f9fa">
<p> </p>
<div id="toolbar" class="toolbar-container"> </div>
<div class="container" style="--line-height:1.6em;" dir="ltr">
<div class="header reader-header reader-show-element"> <a
class="domain reader-domain"
href="https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-get-vaccinated/"
moz-do-not-send="true">trialsitenews.com</a>
<h1 class="reader-title">Should you get vaccinated?</h1>
<div class="credits reader-credits">Steve Kirsch</div>
<div class="meta-data">
<div class="reader-estimated-time" dir="ltr">201-256 minutes</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="content">
<div class="moz-reader-content reader-show-element">
<div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
<div>
<p>I always get vaccinated. I have been fully vaccinated
with the Moderna COVID vaccine. My three daughters have
all been vaccinated. </p>
<p>I recently learned that <a
href="https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1403842234164736004"
moz-do-not-send="true">these vaccines have likely
killed over 25,800 Americans</a> (which I confirmed 3
different ways) and disabled at least 1,000,000 more.
And we’re only halfway to the finish line. We need to
PAUSE these vaccines NOW before more people are killed.
</p>
<p>The CDC, FDA, and NIH aren’t disclosing how many people
have been killed or disabled from the COVID vaccines.
The mainstream media isn’t asking any questions; they
are playing along. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and
others are all censoring content that goes against the
“perfectly safe” narrative so nobody is the wiser. Tony
Fauci, the “father of COVID,” is still in his job even
though all of this is his fault. Cliff Lane, who reports
to Tony, is still sandbagging early treatments so that
people will falsely believe that the vaccine is the only
option. The Democrats are still asleep at the wheel by
refusing to request Fauci’s unredacted emails from the
NIH which will prove he covered up the fact he created
the virus in the first place. Biden is clueless urging
Americans to vaccinate their kids with a deadly vaccine
that has likely killed more than 25,000 Americans so
far. Academics in the medical community are nearly all
clueless, urging people to get the safe and effective
vaccine. When I tried to bring this to the attention of
leading academics they told me I was wrong and not to
contact them ever again. Sound too hard to believe? I
don’t blame you. But there is a reason that this article
is the most popular article that has ever been on
TrialSiteNews with over 1M views so far. It’s because
everything I’ve said is true. And nobody will debate me
live about it. They all refuse.</p>
<p>Based on what I <strong>now </strong>know about the
miniscule vaccine benefits (less than a .5% reduction in
absolute risk), side effects (including death), current
COVID rates, and the success rate of early treatment
protocols, <strong>the answer I would give today to
anyone asking me for advice as to whether to take any
of the current vaccines would be, “Just say NO.”</strong>
Waiting for <a
href="https://trialsitenews.com/breaking-news-novavax-traditional-vaccine-brings-imminent-competition-to-the-genetic-based-vaccines-currently-under-eua/"
moz-do-not-send="true">Novavax </a>(and other
traditional vaccines) is a much safer option. If you get
COVID in the meantime, treating with early treatment
protocols that incorporate fluvoxamine and ivermectin is
vastly superior to getting the most dangerous vaccine in
the last 30 years.</p>
<p>Vaccines are particularly contraindicated if you have
already been infected with COVID or are under age 20.
For these people, I would say “<strong>NO! NO! NO!</strong>”
</p>
<p>In this article, I will explain <strong>what I have
learned since I was vaccinated that totally changed my
mind</strong>. You will learn how these vaccines work
and the shortcuts that led to the mistakes that were
made. You will understand why there are so many side
effects and <strong>why these are so varied</strong>
and why they usually happen within 30 days of
vaccination. You will understand why kids are having
heart issues (for which there is no treatment), and
temporarily losing their sight, and ability to talk. You
will understand why as many as 3% may be severely
disabled by the vaccine. You will understand why doctors
aren’t reporting these as vaccine-related.</p>
<p><strong>What I find deeply disturbing is the lack of
transparency on how dangerous the current COVID
vaccines are. </strong>Healthy people could end up
dead or permanently disabled at a rate that is “off the
charts” compared with any other vaccine in our history.
Look at the death report in our government’s official
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
summarized in the tweet below. <strong>This is the most
deadly vaccine we’ve ever made by a long shot.</strong>
That’s why they have to give you incentives to get
vaccinated. They need to vaccinate everyone BEFORE
people read this article or watch <a
href="https://rumble.com/vi2esn-dr-peter-mccullough-on-the-rush-to-vaccinate-the-entire-population..html"
moz-do-not-send="true">this video of Dr. Peter
McCullough explaining clearly why the current COVID
vaccines are unsafe and completely unnecessary for our
children</a>.</p>
<div>
<figure><img
src="https://trialsitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/image-12.png"
alt="" moz-do-not-send="true" width="593"
height="463"><figcaption>The death rate from this
vaccine is off the charts, more than all 70 vaccines
over the past 30 years combined</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>The stopping condition of a typical vaccine is 25-50
deaths. But there isn’t a stopping condition for this
vaccine! It appears <a
href="https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/"
moz-do-not-send="true">we’ve killed over 25,800 people
(based on CDC “unexplained deaths”)</a> and nobody is
batting an eye. The CDC is focused on how to vaccinate
more people. Clinics today report as high as a 10:1
ratio of vaccine-related cases to COVID cases. So now we
have a new health emergency: deaths and disability from
the vaccines.</p>
<p>But this is just the beginning of our story. We have a
lot of ground to cover. I’ll talk about Fauci, NIAID,
CDC, Congress, academia, Cliff Lane, and more. I will
close with action items you can take and how to treat
vaccine victims.</p>
<p>Before we jump into the details, here are some key
points:</p>
<ol>
<li>At least 25,000 deaths from the vaccine. The
OpenVAERS team think it is over 20,000 due to under
reporting. But we looked at the CMS database and it
appears VAERS is under-reporting by 5X. And the <a
href="https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/"
moz-do-not-send="true">CDC excess unexplained deaths
are 25,000 as well</a>. It matches up.</li>
<li><strong>NOBODY will debate me</strong>. People
resort to personal attacks because they can’t attack
the facts. But nobody who counts (e.g., over 10K
Twitter followers) will debate me. I’ve tried
everything. People are too afraid I’ll win. If you
have at least 10K Twitter followers and agree to a
recorded live Zoom debate, just say so in the comments
below. </li>
<li>Biodistribution data shows massive accumulation in
ovaries of the LNP (which instructs cells in ovaries
to sprout toxic spike protein). Whoops. That was never
supposed to be leaked out. We obtained it via FOIA
request. The CDC never told you about that one, did
they? Of course not!</li>
<li><a
href="http://www.skirsch.com/covid/Vaccine_safety_in_preg_NEJM_May_28_2021.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">82% miscarriage rate in first
20 weeks</a> (10% is the normal rate). It is
baffling that the CDC says the vaccine is safe for
pregnant women when it is so clear that this is not
the case. For example, one our family friends is a
victim of this. She miscarried at 25 weeks and is
having a D&C on 6/9/21. She had her first shot 7
weeks ago, and her second shot 4 weeks ago. The baby
had severe bleeding of the brain and other
disfigurements. Her gynecologist had never seen
anything like that before in her life. They called in
a specialist who said it was probably a genetic defect
(because everyone buys into the narrative that the
vaccine is safe it is always ruled out as a possible
cause). No VAERS report. No CDC report. Yet the
doctors I’ve talked to say that it is over 99% certain
it was the vaccine. The family doesn’t want an autopsy
for fear that their daughter will find out it was the
vaccine. This is a perfect example of how these
horrible side effects just never get reported
anywhere. </li>
<li><a
href="https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/increased-risk-of-heart-muscle-inflammation-linked-with-mrna-vaccines-seen-in-ottawa"
moz-do-not-send="true">25X the possibility of
myocarditis</a> for teen boys (can lead to heart
failure and death)</li>
<li>Kids already have natural immunity (<a
href="https://twitter.com/ScienceMagazine/status/1401192114239721478"
moz-do-not-send="true">Science Magazine article</a>),
so there is no benefit to vaccination, only risk. Have
you ever seen the risk / benefit analysis by the CDC??
Ask for it before you consent. </li>
<li>No point vaccinating those who’ve had COVID-19: <a
href="https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210608/No-point-vaccinating-those-whoe28099ve-had-COVID-19-Findings-of-Cleveland-Clinic-study.aspx"
moz-do-not-send="true">Findings of Cleveland Clinic
study</a>. No benefit, only risk.</li>
<li>Doctors who attribute adverse events to the vaccine
are punished (such as <a
href="https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/wp-content/uploads/vcc-open-letter-dr-hoffe-to-dr-henry-april-5-2021.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">Dr. Hoffe</a>). So under
reporting is incentivized.</li>
<li>The CDC refuses to say how many people have died and
is “still investigating” heart damage in kids even
though it is obvious why (free spike protein causing
clotting and inflammation). A 25X increase when the
only “new” thing is the vaccine isn’t hard to figure
out. Ask the CDC for their current top 5 hypotheses
for the cause. It will be more than amusing to see
what they say. If it isn’t the vaccine, heads should
roll.</li>
<li>The CDC is deliberately misleading the American
people. Check out the <a
href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/expect/after.html"
moz-do-not-send="true">side effects page</a>. Death,
disability, excessive miscarriage rates, heart
attacks, stroke, inability to walk, talk, or see,
Bell’s Palsy, persistent pain, Parkinson’s like
symptoms, re-activation of shingles, blood clots, etc.
are all missing.</li>
<li>>500X more deadly than the flu vaccine</li>
<li>COVID vaccines have generated more adverse reports
in the last 6 months than all 70 vaccines over the
past 30 years combined. They missed that one.</li>
<li>Defective virus design (s1 was never supposed to be
free, inclusion of PEG was unnecessary and allows LNP
to be widely distributed)</li>
<li>Strong opposition to vaccination by extremely
credible voices like Malone, <a
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGBDETOPAJA"
moz-do-not-send="true">Geert Vanden Bossche</a>,
others</li>
<li>NIAID (Cliff Lane) is improperly manipulating the
COVID Treatment Guidelines to make it appear these
drugs do not work, thus giving the world the false
impression that the vaccine, even if imperfect, is the
only way out. Ivermectin and fluvoxamine have been
confirmed in Phase 3 trials. Ivermectin has a very
high quality systematic review, the highest possible
level in Evidence Based Medicine. Repurposed drugs are
safer and more effective than the current vaccines. In
general, early treatment with an effective protocols
reduce your risk of dying by more than 100X so instead
of 600,000 deaths, we’d have fewer than 6,000 deaths.
NOTE: The vaccine has already killed over 6,000 people
and that’s from the vaccine alone (and doesn’t count
any breakthrough deaths).</li>
<li>Vaccines skipped proper toxicology studies in order
to bring to market faster. We don’t know what we don’t
know.</li>
<li>The unpredictable and horrifying side effects of
this vaccine on heathy kids, such as the 16 year old
girl who was unable to speak and see just 48 hours
after being vaccinated</li>
<li>Debilitating side effects can happen at any time
because vaccine victims are very similar to COVID long
haulers (<a href="http://www.covidlonghaulers.com/"
moz-do-not-send="true">Dr. Bruce Patterson has
discovered this</a>) and we all know that long haul
can start at any time (even when the disease is
asymptomatic) and could be incurable.</li>
<li>Because the vaccine is not perfectly safe, the
government is required by law to warn people of the
death and disability risks caused by the vaccine and
to obtain informed consent. Always be sure to ask for
the 50 most serious side effects and how often they
happen. And find out whether they will compensate you
if you are disabled for life from the vaccine. This is
important because the blood clots can form anywhere
with this very unsafe vaccine.</li>
</ol>
<p>Note: this is a large document and different sections
were written at different times so you may find that the
numbers may be inconsistent. If you spot an error,
please use the comments to point it out.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If you enjoyed reading this article, please <a
href="https://twitter.com/stkirsch"
moz-do-not-send="true">follow me on Twitter at
@stkirsch</a> so I can keep you apprised of how this
story progresses. The more followers I have, the less
likely they will ignore my requests for informed
consent and data transparency. Also, please share with
your friends on social media. Thanks! </p>
</blockquote>
<h2>New research shows why we should not vaccinate kids</h2>
<p>Will we listen to the SCIENCE? Or will will follow the
Biden, CDC, NIH narrative blindly? Time to decide.</p>
<p>In other words, <strong>science says that kids are
essentially already vaccinated</strong>. So giving
them a dangerous vaccine has virtually no benefit but
significant downsides (like death).</p>
<p>But the academics are too vested in the false narrative
to let one study take them down. I predict they will
ignore the science and try to discredit it. That’s
exactly what they’ve done with fluvoxamine and
ivermectin even though all those studies were published
in peer reviewed journals too. They are good at
suppressing science and convincing the masses that the
vaccine is needed and safe, regardless of the actual
facts. They believe the Phase 3 studies and consider
real world events as anecdotal.</p>
<p>Here’s the third item I need you to see. This is the
biodistribution graph created from the <a
href="https://trialsitenews.com/foia-document-for-vaccine-discussion-as-to-mrna-based-vaccine-safety-signals/"
moz-do-not-send="true">Pfizer data obtained via Byram
Bridle FOIA request</a> to help you visualize where
the vaccine is going in your child’s body. This shows
you the the sites where it cranks out the toxic spike
protein; the higher the line, the greater the production
of spike protein that can cause damage to blood vessels
and cause inflammation. </p>
<p>NOTE: There are areas of the body that are not included
here like the injection site (165), liver (24), spleen
(23), and adrenals (18). These were not included so you
can see more detail. The graph ends at 48 hours because
that is the extent of the data provided in the original
Pfizer study. The mRNA is basically mostly gone after 48
hours which is why it ends there. I did not commission
this slide; it was created by <a
href="https://www.pandata.org/" moz-do-not-send="true">PANDA</a>.</p>
<div>
<figure><img
src="https://trialsitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Ovaries-get-the-mRNA-from-Pfizer-Shot-Graph-1024x712.png"
alt="" moz-do-not-send="true" width="1024"
height="712"><figcaption>Biodistribution of lipid
nanoparticles which carry the mRNA show that the
ovaries get the highest concentration. This turns
the ovaries into a very large manufacturing plant to
turn out toxic spike protein. Accumulation in the
bone marrow is likely not good either. What are the
long term implications of that?</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>Here’s what this means. This vaccine seeks out your
daughter’s ovaries and instructs the cells in the
ovaries to turn out a very toxic spike protein. It also
goes to your child’s brain, heart, and other critical
organs. This can cause deafness, blindness, inability to
speak, myocarditis, pericarditis, and more at
unacceptable rates. It may permanently damage your
child’s reproductive system. We just don’t know. Would
you like to volunteer your child for a clinical trial so
we can find out? Well if so, and if your child concurs,
then get vaccinated and be part of the largest
experiment ever done on the human reproductive system. </p>
<p>OK, let’s recap what we’ve learned so far, because
there is a lot more to talk about. I am just getting
started.</p>
<ol>
<li>The destruction we are doing to our kid’s hearts,
brains and especially their ovaries. We are harming
perfectly healthy young adults. For example, the
miscarriage rates are alarming post vaccination: <a
href="http://www.skirsch.com/covid/Vaccine_safety_in_preg_NEJM_May_28_2021.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">82% spontaneous abortion rate
before 20 weeks</a>. </li>
<li>Approximately <strong>2% of people report severe /
still annoying side effects</strong> based on the
random sampling I’ve done. This number is extremely
high but it totally explains why the “Vaccine Side
Effects” groups in Facebook had over 200,000 members
before Facebook deleted them. There are much better
options where no healthy person has any added risk of
death or disability (since they will not need to be
treated at all).</li>
<li>The government has been suppressing the fact that
repurposed drugs work with virtually 100% success when
given early with virtually zero side effects. So the
better, safer alternative is considered “unproven”
when Cliff Lane (head of the NIH COVID Guidelines who
reports to Tony Fauci) knows without a doubt that it
works.</li>
</ol>
<p>Sound like a conspiracy theory? I don’t blame you. I
don’t think there is a conspiracy (except for a select
few such as <a
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNxoVFZwMYw"
moz-do-not-send="true">those called out in Chris
Martenson’s excellent video</a> on the coverup
happening after the outbreak). I have no issues with
anyone at Moderna or Pfizer or any government agency (<strong>again
with the exception of Tony Fauci and Cliff Lane</strong>
and a handful of others who were in on it and aren’t
talking). I think everyone else are all ethical people
who started with the best intentions, shit happened, and
now people don’t want to see the reality because of the
cognitive dissonance it would create. So the CDC and FDA
ignore all the <strong>subjective </strong>safety
signals (like alarming anecdotal reports from doctors)
and rely on what I believe (based on info from CDC
insiders) is a flawed serious event warning system
(combined with pressure not to report that there is
anything wrong). Hence everyone is acting like there is
nothing wrong because their traditional alarm bells
aren’t triggering. <strong>A 25X higher event rate</strong>
for myocarditis after vaccination… oh, completely
normal. They justify that because they think that the
vaccine is so helpful (a 10X reduction in cases) that
even if there is death caused by the vaccine, society is
better off net net. So they support the false narrative
that the vaccine is safe. And none of them realize that
early treatment of COVID is way better and safer since
Fauci and Lane suppress the better option.</p>
<p>For example, why is Monica Gandhi calling for
vaccinating kids <a
href="https://twitter.com/MonicaGandhi9/status/1401446515550277638"
moz-do-not-send="true">including her own</a>? Is she
evil? Of course not! I asked her <a
href="https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1401619770932301825"
moz-do-not-send="true">for the risk benefit
calculation in this tweet</a>. Will she reply? I doubt
it. Most of the doctors who swallow the false narrative
find it difficult to deal with the facts. </p>
<p>Also, let me point out that in this document I link to
a number of sources, some of whom tout conspiracy
theories like this is being done deliberately for
nefarious purposes. I absolutely don’t believe that. If
I include a reference to someone else’s material I do
not endorse any conspiracy theories that are espoused by
them. I will make one exception for Chris Martenson. All
of his <a
href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD2-QVBQi48RRQTD4Jhxu8w"
moz-do-not-send="true">YouTube material I have watched
of his work is all top notch</a>, well done, and well
supported. <a
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yn1MDIBO7M"
moz-do-not-send="true">Watch this video of Dr. Chris
Martenson taking down Fauci</a>‘s original Senate
testimony. It is priceless. Chris mentions my work at
47:30. It’s hard to argue with his conspiracy theories.
</p>
<p>Still, it’s a bit hard to explain why they aren’t at
least warning the public that the vaccine is the
deadliest vaccine ever and has an extremely high
incidence of death and long-term disability. There is
absolutely no excuse for hiding that. Health authorities
have a responsibility to report that and they aren’t
telling the real numbers to anyone.</p>
<p>To figure out the truth, all you have to do is realize
one important thing: <strong>there isn’t any
transparency here on the numbers.</strong> I called my
local pharmacy to see if the pharmacist knew the death
and disability rates. Nope. No clue. We are so
brainwashed into believing the narrative that the
vaccine is safe that nobody even asks the question: “So,
exactly how many people have been killed or severely
disabled from the vaccine?” There’s a reason for that
lack of transparency: the CDC has no clue what the
numbers really are (the VAERS numbers are a lower bound
and could be off by as much as 100x). Nobody will tell
me either (and believe me I’m persistent). That alone
should be frightening.</p>
<p>Not only won’t they tell us the numbers, but they
aren’t answering any questions either: nobody is willing
to debate me on the issues raised in this article in a
public forum. Nobody from the government will. None of
the docs on Clubhouse who promote the false narrative
will either. If they did, they will be exposed as
promoting false info and would lose their followers.
Here’s proof they are chicken: <a
href="https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1401589692512886788"
moz-do-not-send="true">my Twitter post challenging
them all to a debate in front of all their followers.</a></p>
<div>
<figure><img
src="https://trialsitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/image-14.png"
alt="" moz-do-not-send="true" width="600"
height="659"><figcaption><a
href="https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1401589692512886788"
moz-do-not-send="true">Twitter challenge issued
Jun 6.</a> I don’t think anyone is going to accept
my offer to debate because they know they will lose.
Badly. And I’m not even a doctor. As of 6/8/21,
nobody has dared to challenge me when the playing
field is level.</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>If you check, everything in this document is completely
on the level and everything is independently verifiable
from trustworthy sources. Government agencies are
refusing to even comment on this document (and
TrialSiteNews has tried reaching out for comments).
Consider this: do you how many people have been killed
and disabled from this vaccine so far? Of course you
don’t. They don’t have accurate numbers themselves.</p>
<p>Vaccines are never designed to kill or disable people.
The background death rate for vaccination in the US as
reported in VAERS <500 people per year and that’s
primarily because people coincidentally die around the
time of the vaccination (a smaller amount will have some
sort of adverse reaction to the vaccine). The death toll
for the current COVID vaccines in the US alone is off
the charts compared with all other vaccines in any other
year.</p>
<p>There are now over 5,000 reported deaths so far, and
that’s likely a very conservative estimate because the
data is under reported historically and even more so
during the pandemic (based on all the anecdotes I’m
aware of because nobody wants to challenge the narrative
that the vaccine is anything but safe). Note that a
comparable % of Americans have been vaccinated with the
COVID vaccine as compared with prior years. This vaccine
is more than 100X more deadly than the flu vaccine…
possibly even 1,000 times more deadly as I will explain
in detail below.</p>
<p>Virtually all of these deaths are “excess deaths” due
to the vaccine. The CDC cannot explain any of these
excess deaths. If it wasn’t the vaccine, what caused it?
Have you seen the analysis of any of these cases? They
cannot explain how dozens of our children have heart
problems now. They will not disclose how many dozens of
kids are affected. 10 dozen? 100 dozen? They will not
tell us the truth. The one thing all those 5,000 deaths
had in common was the vaccine.</p>
<p>In Israel, the adverse event tracking is much more
accurate than the US. <a
href="https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/increased-risk-of-heart-muscle-inflammation-linked-with-mrna-vaccines-seen-in-ottawa"
moz-do-not-send="true">They found rate of myocarditis
in vaccinated young adults is<strong> up to 25X the
normal background</strong> rate for that age range</a>.
That’s not my calculation. That’s right from the article
(“The rate reported among young men in Israel was 25
times higher”). “Israeli researchers reported this week
that between one in 3,000 and one in 6,000 men between
the ages of 16 and 24 had developed myocarditis, or
heart muscle inflammation, after receiving <strong>both
doses</strong> of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine there.”
That’s <a
href="https://twitter.com/MonicaGandhi9/status/1401236141769039879"
moz-do-not-send="true">4X the rate for even the
smallpox vaccine (which is 1 in 12,000)</a>.</p>
<p>However, doctors in the US insist this is normal and
everyone should be vaccinated including kids. WTF?!?!</p>
<p>Pfizer has said that it is aware of the Israeli
findings, but doesn’t think a causal link has been
established. <a
href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/myocarditis-heart-inflammation-covid-vaccine-1.6053963"
moz-do-not-send="true">The company said the rate of
myocarditis after vaccination was no higher than the
rate normally seen in the general population</a>.
Seriously?!?! How can they say that with a straight face
to the press? This is a classic example of gaslighting.</p>
<p>Note that the health tracking in the US is terrible as
you can see from this <a
href="https://portal.ct.gov/Coronavirus/Covid-19-Knowledge-Base/What-to-Know-about-Myocarditis-after-COVID-19-vaccination"
moz-do-not-send="true">report from Connecticut showing
a one in 20,000 rate of myocarditis</a> in 16-34 year
olds; we miss reporting most of the cases. Darn.</p>
<p>So now after killing more than 4,500 Americans, the
government wants to “protect” your children knowing full
well that some of them will die from a vaccine that is<strong>
totally unnecessary and dangerous</strong>. It is
preposterous and no parent should put up with it.</p>
<p>This vaccine is much more dangerous than any vaccine in
our history. There are <strong>more reactions to this
vaccine than all 70 vaccines in the last 30 years
combined</strong>. This is obvious from OpenVAERS
since the total reports from this vaccine and # of
deaths are rapidly approaching >50% of all reported
cases. Note that VAERS is a lagging indicator because
there is a substantial backlog of VAERS reports. As of
28 May, there were 262,566 reported adverse reactions
regarding Covid-19 vaccinations. However, there were
another 168,564 reports that have been submitted to
VAERS but not added to the database yet.</p>
<p>The vaccine teaches cells all over your body (every
organ especially women’s ovaries) to make a toxic spike
protein.</p>
<p>Over 4,500 people have been killed by this “safe”
vaccine. If a foreign nation killed well over 4,500
Americans, would we sit idly by and cheer them on? The
government might argue that the death toll is less than
the 600,000 Americans who have died from the virus. But
that’s a false argument because our government has been
deliberately suppressing the alternatives (despite proof
of efficacy in large randomized Phase 3 trials) and
keeping them from view.</p>
<p>It is almost beside the point to calculate the exact
number of deaths. In the past, the death threshold was
that if 1 in 1 million Americans were killed by the
vaccine, we stop it. So we stop at 168 excess deaths.
There are 4,500 excess deaths right now and probably
more like 25,000. So we are at 25X to 125X over the
stopping threshold and we want to accelerate our rate of
vaccination and give it to our kids. Why isn’t the press
asking why we are doing this when there are better
alternatives that result in much lower loss of life?</p>
<p>We don’t know how many people have died. 4,500 is a
lower bound. And many more will be temporarily or <a
href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/news/vaccine-researcher-admits-big-mistake-says-spike-protein-is-dangerous-toxin?__twitter_impression=true"
moz-do-not-send="true">permanently disabled</a>.
Nobody is talking.</p>
<p>Based on all the anecdotal reports from physicians I’ve
received so far, I estimate the severe life altering
side-effects rate to be around 2% and the death rate
could be as high as .02% (1 in 5,000 patients which
means most docs will never see a death so it will look
safe). <strong>These are estimates and will be refined
as I get more data.</strong> For example in one
practice of 600 vaccinated patients, 6 have severe
adverse events (SAEs) and one of those is near death. I
can’t identify the physician because he is afraid of
retribution. For <a
href="https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/wp-content/uploads/vcc-open-letter-dr-hoffe-to-dr-henry-april-5-2021.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">900 patients of Dr. Hoffe, 3
are permanently disabled and 1 died</a>. Dr. Hoffe
wasn’t afraid to speak out but telling the truth
resulted in him losing his hospital privileges and
having his reports torn up. Ask yourself, why would any
doctor jeopardize their livelihood? He isn’t an
anti-VAXer; he was pro-vaccination. He vaccinated 900
patients. He felt compelled to <a
href="https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/wp-content/uploads/vcc-open-letter-dr-hoffe-to-dr-henry-april-5-2021.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">write up his serious concerns</a>,
basically “I have been quite alarmed at the high rate of
serious side-effects from this novel treatment.” If the
vaccine is as safe as they claim, you never see notes
like that. Nobody has the time or incentive. Why would
anyone draft such a detailed note to get fired?</p>
<p>Excerpts:</p>
<ol start="6">
<li>It must be emphasised, that these people <strong>were
not sick people</strong>, being treated for some<br>
devastating disease. These were <strong>previously
healthy people, who were offered an<br>
experimental therapy, with unknown long-term
side-effects, to protect them against an<br>
illness that has the same mortality rate as the flu.
Sadly, their lives have now been<br>
ruined.</strong></li>
<li>It is normally considered a fundamental principal of
medical ethics, to discontinue a<br>
clinical trial if significant harm is demonstrated
from the treatment under investigation.</li>
<li>So my last question is this; <strong>Is it
medically ethical to continue this vaccine rollout,
in<br>
view of the severity of these life altering
side-effects, after just the first shot? In<br>
Lytton, BC, we have an incidence of 1 in 225 of
severe life altering side-effects, from this<br>
experimental gene modification therapy</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>This is why doctors will not speak out. Fear of
retribution. There is no benefit to speaking up.</p>
<div>
<figure><img
src="https://trialsitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/image-11.png"
alt="" moz-do-not-send="true" width="269"
height="138"><figcaption>This is what happens if you
speak the truth: they take away your hospital
privileges and delete your reports. This sends a
clear message to doctors: support the narrative or
else.</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>A superior alternative to vaccination is simply to
treat a COVID infection with a proven early treatment
protocol and to modernize our hospital protocols (which
we are afraid to change to adopt drugs like
cyproheptadine). This alternative results in
significantly lower disability and death compared to the
vaccines. Newer vaccines available soon appear to be
much safer than the current vaccines.</p>
<h2>Purpose of this document</h2>
<p>The purpose of this document is to raise legitimate
concerns about the false narrative that the current
vaccines are safe and should be used on everyone.</p>
<p>I am open to corrections, especially if you feel you
have been unfairly abused by this article. Just reply in
the comments section below for everyone to see.</p>
<p>There are certainly a lot of people who buy into the
narrative. And it’s a reasonable position since the
Phase 3 study was done by the book, etc. One of my
friends was an investigator on the Pfizer trial and she
said there was nothing amiss and everything they saw
looked clean. I have no reason to believe that there was
any foul play here.</p>
<p>I have nothing bad to say about any of the vaccine
makers. Sure, they cut some corners, but that was
reasonable: you make some calculated bets when time is
short. If I were in charge, I might have made the same
decisions. So my issues are not at all with any of the
companies themselves. I really think they’ve all done a
magnificent job under extremely difficult circumstances.
</p>
<p>But what is troubling to me is finding lots of evidence
that doesn’t match the narrative and that raise
legitimate concerns about the safety of the vaccine. The
purpose of this document is to bring these issues to
light so they can be addressed one by one and be
resolved. </p>
<p>Therefore, I believe that this document is a valuable
addition to the scientific discourse. </p>
<p>There were a lot of people who chose to sever all ties
with me after I published this article; nearly all of
them would be considered “top tier” academics.
Challenging the accepted narrative is seen as evil. They
said I was risking lives and they didn’t want their name
associated with me.</p>
<p>So be it. I think it is extremely dangerous for the
scientific community to have the attitude that if anyone
challenges the narrative that they must be wrong and the
correct course of action is to sever all ties and refuse
to engage in debate. If I’m wrong, I’ll be discredited.
If I’m right, I’ll be the one saving lives and their
views were the ones endangering lives. I wouldn’t be
spending my time writing this if I wasn’t convinced I
was right. There are too many things nobody can explain
if you buy the hypothesis that the vaccines are safe.</p>
<p>I asked these academics “look if I’m wrong, then how do
you explain this….?” None of them would engage. Some of
them said, “I heard you are against the vaccine. Never
talk to me again.” I’m serious. You can’t make this
stuff up.</p>
<p>These guys are really smart, but I couldn’t disagree
more with their approach.</p>
<p>I was treated as if I’m an evil person. I’m not evil at
all. My sole motivation is to save lives by seeking
resolution to key questions. Ostracizing dissenters is
bad science in my opinion. </p>
<p>Their belief system is based on phase 3 trial results.
If reality diverges from the Phase 3 study, the academic
will trust the trial and ignore the reality as
“anecdotal.” This is why when people go to their doctors
complaining of issues, they are directed to do genetic
testing because the vaccine is eliminated as a possible
cause since it is safe according to the false narrative.
</p>
<p>That’s not science at all. Science is about
intellectual curiosity and fitting hypothesis to the
data. Did they redefine science to exclude anything but
data in a large Double Blind Controlled Trrial
(DB-RCT)??? Maybe they did that when I wasn’t looking.</p>
<p> In my opinion, we have to judge success based on real
world results on 100M people and not bury our heads in
the sand and pretend the only evidence we have is DB-RCT
and that real-world data is simply so messy to interpret
that it must be discarded as unreliable. Sure, It is
messy to interpret but you do not need a DB-RCT when you
have a 25X normal event rate that cannot be explained
away. They claim you do. The mindset is ingrained. It’s
weird. That baby whose brain was fried by the vaccine?
Must be genetic defect! As a scientist, how can you
possibly exclude the vaccine as the cause? If this has
never been observed before in nature, why would you rush
to a natural origin theory vs. the external intervention
of a toxic material causing a miscarriage rate of 82%.
Any engineer looking at this problem and given two
options, would always conclude it was the vaccine.</p>
<p>I’ve listened to both sides and I’m convinced that
there is an air-tight case to be made here for the
counter-narrative because the things I’ve seen with my
own eyes are not consistent with the narrative. Could I
be wrong? Sure. Could they be wrong? Absolutely. But my
narrative fits the facts and their narrative doesn’t. So
there you go.</p>
<p>I am certainly not alone in challenging the narrative.
See <a
href="https://downloads.regulations.gov/FDA-2021-P-0521-0001/attachment_1.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">Wastila Citizen Petition</a>
and <a
href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi4mPzag8LtAhXAURUIHXrdB4s4ChAWMAV6BAgMEAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wodarg.com%2Fapp%2Fdownload%2F9033912514%2FWodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_signed_with_Exhibits_geschwa%25CC%2588rzt.pdf%3Ft%3D1606870652&usg=AOvVaw3uUxCRJSd-1Rta-57kC9OX"
moz-do-not-send="true">Wodarg Citizen Petition</a> and
<a
href="https://downloads.regulations.gov/FDA-2021-P-0460-0001/attachment_1.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">Childrens Health Citizen
Petition</a> as examples.</p>
<p>The goal here is to raise the issues and seek the
truth. I think we should embrace open discussion and
resolve the inconsistencies constructively. </p>
<p>Since you already know the narrative, this document
will focus on presenting the case for the
counter-narrative.</p>
<p>My confidence level in the counter-narrative is now
100%. There are no rational explanations for what I’ve
observed. Nobody can explain them. Congress staff won’t
reply to me. The CDC believes there are 0 deaths caused
by the vaccine. That is so divorced from reality that it
isn’t funny. You’ve got over a 25X higher death rate
from this vaccine vs. history, you have no clue what
caused all the deaths (“the vaccine … duh”), and now we
feel so good we want to kill our kids? Are you kidding
me? Lookup the complications from having <a
href="https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/myocarditis/symptoms-causes/syc-20352539"
moz-do-not-send="true">myocarditis</a> (hint: heart
failure, death). What kind of parent would sign up their
child for that especially given the Science article that
shows no benefit. So basically, your kid gets to play
Russian Roulette with the vaccine and there is no upside
here, only downside.</p>
<p>I think the entire academic community should be ashamed
of themselves for not speaking out loudly against this
vaccine. It shows how inept they are that a computer
entrepreneur can clearly see what is happening and they
cannot. It is embarrassing for the entire medical
community. It’s going to come out that I am on the right
side of this and they are all wrong. The evidence on the
table is so compelling. And the longer academia digs in
their heels opposing what I write here, the worse they
are going to look.</p>
<p>It’s also an indictment of the mainstream media. There
should be a <em>New York Times</em> investigative
journalist on this. Know how many inbound queries I’ve
gotten (since I know a lot more that I can’t disclose
publicly): zero. However, we did make an outbound
request to one of the most respected publications in the
world, and they are looking at this. So it will be
interesting to watch this unfold.</p>
<p>It should tell you something that NOBODY will debate
me. NOBODY.</p>
<h2>Safe vs. unsafe</h2>
<p>A legit argument was raised by one reader about the
safe vs. unsafe moniker. Safety is relative. So when I
say the vaccine is “unsafe” it means the alternative
options have a significantly more attractive risk/reward
profile.</p>
<h2>Questions they refuse to answer</h2>
<p>There are really basic questions that the media should
be asking public agencies and Congress. Since they
aren’t asking any questions, I thought it would be
helpful to provide some “conversation starters” the next
time the press talks to Biden, Fauci, members of
Congress, etc. </p>
<ol>
<li>Why hasn’t Senator Peters requested the unredacted
version of the Fauci emails from NIH? This would tell
us immediately the true source of the virus. No
investigation needed. What is Senator Peters afraid
of? NIH has said he can request the documents and they
will comply.</li>
<li>Can you explain the missing 200,000 records in the
VAERS system? Why are records being removed every week
(they aren’t dups)?</li>
<li>Why haven’t Fauci and Lane been fired? Fauci funded
the research that went wrong and unleashed SARS-CoV-2.
We even have the proof of the coverup after the fact.
Lane has violated the precautionary principle and use
all available evidence principles. Systematic reviews
are the top of the Evidenced Based Medicine (EBM)
pyramid and he doesn’t even mention it in the
ivermectin writeup. He’s responsible for the
unnecessary deaths of hundreds of thousands of
Americans. Shouldn’t there be criminal charges here
since it was willful and knowingly done? </li>
<li>When are Fauci and Biden going to come clean and
tell the world ivermectin really works? Cliff Lane
knows it. Right now <a href="https://www.gavi.org/"
target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"
moz-do-not-send="true">GAVI</a> ( the vaccine
alliance) is running ads all over the world with the
false narrative that ivermectin doesn’t work. That is
not saving lives. WHO knows it works. They are not
saying anything. This is another massive cover up and
disinformation campaign. Here’s an opportunity to set
the record straight? I challenged the world to prove
the NIH was right. No takers. If you can find an error
in the BIRD systematic review, cite it now. Otherwise
you MUST follow Evidence Based Medicine, which rates
Systematic Reviews at the top of the evidence pyramid.
What are we waiting for? We mandate masks without a
single Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), yet for
ivermectin we are silent? Are you kidding me!?!?</li>
<li>When are they going to finish the toxicology studies
in NHPs that they skipped over in the first place? You
can’t do this stuff in rats, and you must use the real
vaccine to do the tests. Please publish the results of
the test and the biodistribution for us all to see,
rather than hide this as “COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL.” That
is not in the public interest to have that data
hidden. Had we seen this earlier, we could have
prevented deaths.</li>
<li>What does President Biden say to my friend’s
daughter who is so distraught about losing her baby
(at 25 weeks) due to the vaccine? Why were pregnant
women told to get vaccinated when <a
href="http://www.skirsch.com/covid/Vaccine_safety_in_preg_NEJM_May_28_2021.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">we knew it was extremely
unsafe</a> since it has 8X higher risk of
spontaneous abortion? The fetus was bloody and
disfigured. The gynecologist had never seen anything
like it. Never. But it was not reported to the CDC as
vaccine related or entered into VAERS despite it being
the most likely explanation since the toxic S1 subunit
homes in on the area surrounding the ovaries. It seems
all of these deaths are being covered up by being
written off as “oh, that’s really strange… never seen
that before.” We are told the vaccine is safe so
nobody ever thinks the vaccine caused it. No autopsy.</li>
<li>How can the CDC possibly call a vaccine that kills
somewhere around 1 in 10,000 people as “perfectly
safe” while the FDA insists that ivermectin which
kills 1 in 1,000,000,000 as “<a
href="https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19"
moz-do-not-send="true">dangerous and can cause
serious harm</a>.” Are you kidding me?!?!</li>
<li>How can the FDA make N-acetylcysteine (NAC) now
available only by prescription yet the vaccine is
available without a prescription? Can you compare the
number of people killed each year by these two?</li>
<li>Why aren’t you disclosing the exact number of people
who have been killed and disabled from these vaccines?
Shouldn’t that be part of informed consent?</li>
<li>Should a proper “informed consent” document include
all of the key issues raised in this document? If not,
what vaccine-related issues mentioned here should be
excluded and why? When will the new informed consent
with the incidence rate of each significant side
effect be listed? My suggestion would be to include
both the incidence rate and the severity of the
symptom, e.g., stroke, myocardial infarction would be
very serious.</li>
<li>Why has the Biden administration stonewalled all of
my attempts to talk to them about Fluvoxamine? Why
will NOBODY debate the evidence for this drug publicly
with me? Doesn’t the American public deserve an honest
discussion of this important and safe alternative to
vaccination? </li>
<li>How many other cheap, safe, effective drugs against
COVID have been on 60 Minutes? Just fluvoxamine as far
as I know. Will Francis Collins debate me? He’ll lose.
I have the truth and the data on my side and he has no
viable explanation for if the drug doesn’t work how we
can achieve a 100% effect size even with 8 cross-over
patients. How will he explain away a p-value of 1e-14
for the symptom data? It was an NIH funded researcher
who did the trial. </li>
<li>Surely, you must know that both fluvoxamine and
ivermectin were confirmed in large clinical trials
whose processes were validated by the WHO. The WHO was
notified. Lane knows it. The Gates Foundation knows
it. So why are you not letting people know there are
viable alternatives to vaccination? Isn’t that
sandbagging? And why aren’t any of these organizations
speaking out against the shameful ads being run by <a
href="https://www.gavi.org/" target="_blank"
rel="noreferrer noopener" moz-do-not-send="true">GAVI</a>
to dissuade people from using ivermectin. You know
these are wrong, but everyone is silent.</li>
<li>If the NIH Guidelines are right on Ivermectin and
Fluvoxamine, then why has NOBODY come forward to claim
the $2M prize if they can defend the NIH Guidelines?
There hasn’t even been an attempt other than one guy
from Belarus. Seriously?!!?! Is that the best you can
do guys?</li>
<li>Where is your Phase 3 DB-RCT showing that kids under
20 are better off been vaccinated with these vaccines?
I must have missed that one.</li>
<li>Where is your Phase 3 DB-RCT showing that if you’ve
had COVID, you are better off getting these vaccines
or not? I missed that one too. If there was no death
or disability risk from the vaccine, I could see the
argument. But that’s just not reality?</li>
<li>Where is your DB-RCT showing that a 12 year old girl
that is vaccinated today will be able to have kids in
6 years from now?</li>
<li>Where is your DB-RCT showing mask wearing makes a
difference? The only RCT we have on mask wearing
against COVID was done in Denmark and it showed mask
wearing had a statistically insignificant difference.
By your own rules of evidence, you shouldn’t mandate
this. By contrast, fluvoxamine has two published RCTs
showing 100% effect size when given EARLY (lower
effect size when you give it late as with the Phase 3
study). So Fluvoxamine is effective yet not mandated,
yet masks are ineffective and mandated. How do you
explain that? At 50mg BID x 14d, fluvoxamine is
extremely safe with a very low side effect profile. </li>
<li>Why isn’t anyone else asking these obvious questions
that any thinking person should be asking?</li>
<li>Why are physicians who speak out against the
narrative being punished? What happened to Dr. Hoffe?</li>
<li>If it wasn’t the vaccine that has killed over 5,000
people then what was it? Why can’t we see the cases
that have been analyzed so far? How many cases have
been analyzed?</li>
<li>Everyone knows the S1 subunit is toxic causing
inflammation and damage to endothelial cells? Surely,
this was well known at the FDA and CDC. Who brought it
up and why were they ignored?</li>
<li>Why hasn’t <a
href="https://www.scripps.edu/faculty/andersen/"
moz-do-not-send="true">Kristian G. Andersen</a> been
called to Congress to testify about the cover up and
talk about all the redactions in the Fauci emails?
This was the biggest pandemic in our history, and we
are not calling any witnesses with inside
information??? Boy, I don’t get that at all. Would be
awesome if the press interviewed Kristian to tell his
story about the coverup since <a
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNxoVFZwMYw&t=2114s"
moz-do-not-send="true">he’s not talking to Chris
Martenson at all after Chris did his takedown video</a>.</li>
<li>Why is the CDC taking so long to analyze the
myocarditis and pericarditis deaths in teens? What is
the current theory? How many kids have we killed so
far? How many more kids must die before we stop this
campaign? Or are we going to offer them candy and let
them sign the informed consent? </li>
<li>Why will no one from the CDC, FDA, NIH debate me on
these issues listed in this section? Surely, they
cannot be afraid of a Silicon Valley tech entrepreneur
with just two degrees from MIT… in electrical
engineering and computer science???</li>
<li>The NIH COVID Treatment Guidelines panel meetings
are secret. How is THAT in the public interest?
Shouldn’t those meetings be public and allow
presentations from experts on the drug in a public
forum? Should the votes of the panel members be public
so that they can be held accountable for their errors
in judgment? Why is there no calculation of the
downside of getting a wrong recommendation? For
example if there is just a 10% chance that people
think that ivermectin works, why wouldn’t you
recommend it since it will save more lives if it
works? I would like to understand from each panel
member what they believe the % likelihood that
ivermectin is useful against COVID. Do these people
ever talk to any frontline doctors who are using
ivermectin now? So if I have 1,000 docs all with close
to 100% success rate in keeping people out of the
hospital, you’d call that anecdotal and toss the
evidence? Come on guy, people are dying. Science is
about making a hypothesis based on all the evidence,
not cherry picking evidence you like. Look science up
in the dictionary; there is nothing about how you must
ignore data from frontline doctors who are actually
treating real patients and saving lives.</li>
</ol>
<p>We can start with these for now. I have many more I’d
like to ask.</p>
<h2>The smoking gun that I think will bring down Biden and
the Democrats (if the Republicans are smart)</h2>
<p>The smoking gun is the free S1. This means “oh shit,
the vaccine is defective. That was not supposed to
happen.”</p>
<p>Fortunately, with early treatment using drugs proven in
Phase 3 trials, we have a safer, more effective option
than a defective vaccine.</p>
<p>I’m a Democrat. But I’m a human being first. And this
isn’t even a close call. The sooner Biden backs off and
halts the vaccine, the better for his future. If he
moves forward, he and the Democrats will be swept from
power. I do not want that to happen. </p>
<p>The arguments regarding quality-adjusted life years
calculations (QALY) as the basis for justifying
risk/benefit assessments for these vaccines are
incontrovertible. The government has not followed its
own established processes and policies for making these
determinations. Anyone who regularly attends CDC
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
meetings knows what I speak of regarding QALY.</p>
<p><strong>They are violating the law</strong>. The
bioethics and federal law is clear cut and is laid out
in <a
href="https://trialsitenews.com/bioethics-of-experimental-covid-vaccine-deployment-under-eua-its-time-we-stop-and-look-at-whats-going-down/"
moz-do-not-send="true">Malone’s article on TSN</a>:</p>
<ol>
<li>These are experimental vaccines. Emergency Use
Authorization (EUA) grants a waiver for informed
consent, but it doesn’t override key requirements
related to human subject research.</li>
<li>Therefore, the government must comply with federal
statutes that cover ethical human subject research.</li>
<li>There are three key requirements that must be met:
1. full and complete disclosure of risks, 2. test
subjects have to comprehend the risks 3. and there is
willing consent to participate.</li>
</ol>
<p>If anyone refuses to consent, and you try to coerce
them (e.g., a punishment for non-compliance like “i’ll
fire you”), then you are in violation of federal law.</p>
<p>Furthermore, adolescents cannot provide informed
consent; only their parent or legal guardian.</p>
<p>There are three ways around this: </p>
<ol>
<li>Claim that the vaccine is “perfectly safe” (which
would not be true, but doing so waives the consent
requirement)</li>
<li>Change the law (boy that would look really bad and
the Republicans won’t allow it) </li>
<li>Rush it to be approved (boy that would compound the
mistake and tank the Democrats)</li>
</ol>
<p>They are pursuing #3. That just compounds the error and
will discredit the FDA and CDC for decades to come.</p>
<p>The free spike protein (the S1 subunit) in the blood
all over the body is the smoking gun. </p>
<p>This is not right. Free spike is dangerous. Everyone
knew that. It wasn’t supposed to happen. They created
anchoring so you would not get free spike. This should
have been detected, but nobody did the toxicology. <strong>The
FDA didn’t force the drug companies to do the required
toxicology studies. </strong>They were too hurried
and believed the anchoring would work.</p>
<p>We know there is free spike several different ways:</p>
<ol>
<li>It breaches the blood brain barrier. This is why
people are sleepy for days after vaccination… their
brains are fucked up. </li>
<li>There are so many neurological adverse events
reported</li>
<li>PET scans, which determine how cancer responds to
treatment, can’t used used on vaccinated patient for a
couple of weeks because the lymph nodes all over the
body are lighting up from the spike.</li>
<li>The <a
href="https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075"
moz-do-not-send="true">Harvard researchers measured
in vaccinated patients</a>.</li>
</ol>
<p>They<strong> didn’t take the time to get the dose right</strong>.
Dose is way out of the park. Had no time to do dose
ranging.</p>
<p>If President Biden and the Democrats continue to ignore
this article, it will sink them. Please, do the right
thing immediately and stop this experiment now. Go back
and fix the product. It is defective.</p>
<h2>Vaccine mandates are wrong</h2>
<p>Senator Ron Johnson gets it exactly right: <a
href="https://thefederalist.com/2021/06/03/vaccine-mandates-shouldnt-be-the-next-covid-policy-disaster/"
moz-do-not-send="true">vaccine mandates are wrong</a>.</p>
<p>Will any Democrats come join him? </p>
<p>Informed consent is all about your ability to say no.
If there is a mandate, then informed consent (as
required by law) is superfluous. I don’t see how a
mandate can be legal since it violates federal law on
experimentation on human subjects. If the Democrats want
to allow experiments on human subjects without informed
consent, they will need to change the law. And if they
do that, pretty much all of us will change parties.</p>
<h2>What are people saying?</h2>
<p>At this point, you are probably wondering, “What are
people saying about this document?”</p>
<p>Well privately, after most of my academic friends
severed all ties, it’s all been positive. A lot of
people are afraid to speak out in favor of what I wrote
because of fear of retribution because it goes against
the narrative and they could be fired. Boy, America sure
has changed a lot since I was a kid. Today, people stand
in line for a vaccine that has a pretty good chance of
killing them, and if I ask, “do you know if this vaccine
is safe?” they shout me down as “anti-vax.” Gotta love
the tolerance for original thinking. Try this yourself.
It’s mind blowing. </p>
<p>Congress staffers have said “we’ll get back to you.”</p>
<p>Cliff Lane: no answer. I even reached out for
corrections. Nothing. Crickets.</p>
<p>Biden administration: Crickets.</p>
<p>CDC: I’ve always been rebuffed in any of my attempts to
contact Rochelle, so I gave up. </p>
<p>FDA: I like Janet Woodcock. I’ve made my points. She’s
listened. She understands them. She’s not allowed to say
much in response at this time. She’s smart. I have a lot
of respect for her.</p>
<p>In general, I like the people who engage me with
legitimate debate. These are the good people. </p>
<p>People like Cliff Lane, <a
href="https://twitter.com/alexandrosm/status/1404374212907700228?s=21"
moz-do-not-send="true">Jeremy Farrar</a>, Kristian
Andersen who stop communicating when they know they’ve
been caught with their hand in the cookie jar, those are
the people I dislike.</p>
<p>I am a pretty simple guy in that respect.</p>
<h2>Summary of key points covered in this document</h2>
<ol>
<li>Vaccines are never supposed to kill people. The
influenza vaccine doesn’t kill anyone. Virtually zero
(there are also very rare events where people do die,
but they are < 1 in a million). People are much
more likely to die just coincidentally with the
vaccination not from the vaccination. For example,
less than 1 person in the age group 30-39 dies per
year according to VAERS.</li>
<li>The COVID vaccines are unique in that healthy people
who take the vaccine can end up dead or disabled at a
rate that may be far greater than we have been led to
believe. I will debate anyone on this publicly and
they will lose.</li>
<li>This vaccine is much more dangerous than any vaccine
in our history. There are <strong>more reactions to
this vaccine than all 70 vaccines in the last 30
years combined</strong>.</li>
<li>We are essentially creating a nation of vaccine
long-haulers. Some will be asymptomatic, some will
have mild symptoms, some will have disabling symptoms,
and some will die. The symptoms are all over the map.</li>
<li>At a minimum, if the FDA doesn’t halt vaccinations,
they should require a BLACK BOX warning notifying
people that the vaccine can kill you or cause
permanent disability and the rates of both are unknown
at this time. At least that way, people are going into
this with their eyes wide open.</li>
<li>The side effects of the vaccine can be both subtle
and incredibly diverse because the vaccine can affect
any part of your body, including your brain. One
physician said, “What’s so typical about the responses
is the atypical nature of all the presentations.” For
example, my fingers have now started to shake
uncontrollably 2 months after my second dose. This
sort of neurological damage is impossible to show
cause and effect. I never would have ascribed it to
the vaccine because I was told the vaccine was safe.
But if they had told me that the vaccine causes my
body to make a toxin everywhere, including my brain,
any new neurological symptom within 3 months after any
shot is highly suspect. I cannot report it in V-SAFE
since you can’t make a proactive report. I will report
in VAERS. Once you realize most people would never
think to associate it with the vaccine because it
happened 2 months later and the vaccine is supposed to
be safe AND because most people don’t know about VAERS
AND because most people wouldn’t bother to report it
in VAERS since they would deem it too speculative, all
this data is lost. V-SAFE <strong>never warned me
that the symptoms can be subtle, diverse, and to
report EVERYTHING that is NEW and ABNORMAL</strong>
in VAERS. This is why the FDA and CDC isn’t seeing a
safety signal. Had I not written (or read) this
article, I would have ascribed it to old age/bad luck.
I now know better.</li>
<li>We don’t know how many people this vaccine has
killed or disabled. There is no transparency of these
numbers and no analysis of the people who have died or
been disabled. Of course we know these vaccines cause
massive mini blood clots, so nothing is surprising.</li>
<li>If you have anything happen to you within 3 months
of either dose that is <strong>new and affecting your
daily life</strong>, <a
href="https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html"
moz-do-not-send="true">please report it in VAERS</a>.</li>
<li>We are collecting information from doctors. One
doctor, with 600 vaccinated patients, reported that 6
of them had serious adverse events (requiring a
hospital visit or hospitalization); 1 of those
patients may die soon. This is very troubling. We
don’t know if this is typical or not.</li>
<li>Doctors are reporting adverse events in recently
vaccinated patients that are off the charts. The range
of conditions is unprecedented and doctors are baffled
as to the cause and proper treatments. One 16 year old
couldn’t speak or see just 48 hours after getting the
shot. We don’t know how common this is, but even
hearing a single event like this is extremely
troubling. The press didn’t report it; I saw it in an
email. So there must be dozens or hundreds of cases
just like these that we are “unaware” of because it
isn’t considered a vaccine-related event. </li>
<li>The CDC admits that <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/22/health/cdc-heart-teens-vaccination.html"
moz-do-not-send="true">dozens of teenagers have been
diagnosed with heart issues shortly after receiving
the shot</a>. Fear not! They are investigating, but
they will not stop the vaccination program while they
investigate. It’s been 2 weeks and no word. </li>
<li>Normally, vaccination injects or generates a
harmless antigen in your shoulder to generate
immunity. It stays in your shoulder. These vaccines
are different. The mRNA vaccines deliver instructions
to cells all over your body to make a pathogenic spike
protein over the next 48 hours: inside your brain,
heart, ovaries, etc. The spike proteins damage your
blood vessel walls and cause clotting. The spikes can
break free of the cell membrane and freely circulate
causing even more damage. The spike proteins can last
around 30 days. The damage that has been done in the
30 days can last a lifetime.</li>
<li>This is the reason people have a wide range of side
effects: inability to see, inability to speak, heart
attacks, myocarditis, pericarditis, bell’s palsy (half
of your face doesn’t move), numbness in various body
part, re-activation of shingles, etc. Some events are
such as the teenager who killed himself after getting
the shot are very hard to ascribe.</li>
<li>A large fraction of the spike protein ends up in the
ovaries (see nice line graph later in this article… it
will shock you). We don’t know how the reproductive
system of women will be impacted; we won’t know that
for another 4 months. Nobody needs the jab that bad.
Why not wait and see what happens?</li>
<li>Social media companies do not want anyone to
discover the problems until it is too late. Facebook
for example has removed multiple “Vaccine side
effects” groups comprising hundreds of thousands of
users. If there are really no side effects, then what
are these groups talking about? The weather? We don’t
know because Facebook doesn’t want us to know. Don’t
you love the transparency?</li>
<li>Doctors are being told not to speak out or face the
consequences. They are told not to associate deaths
with the vaccine. Why is this needed if the vaccine is
as safe as they led us to believe?</li>
<li>We are not told about the alternatives including
safer vaccines or refusing vaccination and if
infected, treating with an early treatment protocol.</li>
<li>Early treatment protocols with repurposed drugs are
extremely safe and effective. If started within 48
hours of first symptoms, the hospitalization,
fatality, and long-haul COVID rates are extremely low.
In short, early treatment turns COVID into a mild
cold.</li>
<li><a
href="https://trialsitenews.com/costly-tradeoff-with-the-wait-for-the-vaccine-pandemic-strategy/"
moz-do-not-send="true">The NIH is deliberately
sandbagging the approval of drugs used for early
treatment</a> and that sandbagging continues to the
present. They know the drugs work, but they don’t want
anyone to know. The guy leading the vaccine effort
(Fauci) is the same guy suppressing the approval of
alternatives because Cliff Lane, head of the
Guidelines Committee reports to Fauci.</li>
<li>If the government really wants to reduce vaccine
hesitancy, they should make the rate of death and
disability public rather than hiding these numbers.
They are hiding this information from everyone
including doctors on the weekly CDC calls. I asked one
of them recently, “How many people has the vaccine
killed so far?” He said “about 100.” There is no way
just 100 people have died from this vaccine, I
guarantee it. But it just shows you how they are
hiding the true numbers.</li>
<li>Tony Fauci and Cliff Lane should be removed from
office. Their failure to deploy the <a
href="https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1435"
moz-do-not-send="true">Precautionary Principle of
medicine</a> and use <a
href="https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/randomized-control-tests-doidge"
moz-do-not-send="true">all the available evidence</a>
has led to the needless loss of life of millions of
people.</li>
<li>The mainstream media and social networks have
blindly followed the “authorities” and have
contributed to the problem by enabling their false
narratives and shutting out the voices of those who
have legitimate challenges to these authorities.</li>
<li>If you can prove the NIH got it right on ivermectin
and fluvoxamine (they rated them NEUTRAL), there is a
<a
href="https://trialsitenews.com/if-you-can-prove-that-the-nih-and-who-got-their-treatment-guidelines-right-you-could-win-2m/"
moz-do-not-send="true">$2M reward waiting for you</a>.
Nobody has been able to do that because it is
impossible. It is like proving that a baseball team
with a 30-0 win loss record is a losing team. This is
outrageous that Congress is so asleep at the wheel
that they have not taken immediate action to direct
the NIH to fix the Guidelines to minimize loss of
life.</li>
<li><strong>Once you get vaccinated, you can never be
unvaccinated.</strong> The damage may not be
undoable and may only manifest itself years or decades
later. It’s a bit like starting a small fire inside
all of your key organs and letting it burn for 30
days. </li>
<li><strong>If I knew what I know now, I would not have
chosen vaccination with the current vaccines for
myself or my family.</strong> I would have waited
for one of the newer vaccines which are not expected
to suffer from these safety issues (but let’s see what
happens). If I was at risk for COVID, I would
prophylax with ivermectin. If I got COVID in the
meantime, I would treat immediately with a 4 drug
combo of fluvoxamine (50mg BIDx14d), ivermectin (12mg
x 7d), simvastatin (….), and maraviroc (…) . This is
what Dr. Bruce Patterson recommends to his patients
and was developed from what has worked to cure
long-haul COVID cases. If started within 48 hours of
first symptoms, this protocol should be extremely
effective because each drug targets a different
mechanism of harm.</li>
<li>If I already had COVID, I’d wait for the newer
vaccines which confer broader immunity. Since I
already have natural immunity in the meantime, there
is no rush to vaccinate with a potentially unsafe
vaccine.</li>
<li>If you MUST get vaccinated now for some reason, take
50mg once a day of fluvoxamine starting 3 days before
and continuing for 2 weeks. This will reduce
inflammation and damage just like it does for COVID
patients.</li>
<li>These vaccines were rushed to market and they made a
few bad design decisions. There is a way to
re-formulate the current vaccines to significantly
reduce the risk. If Pfizer or Moderna want to talk,
you know where to find me. If the FDA expedites the
fix, it could be fixed in as little as 60 days. I know
of no reason they would not want to at least hear me
out. </li>
<li>Don’t you find it a bit odd that the CDC is telling
kids to get vaccinated without showing proof that they
are better off with the defective vaccine vs. taking
their chances with the virus? I commissioned some
experts to find out which was better and they threw up
their hands because there is no data available to make
the calculation because all the vaccine data is so bad
(VAERS reporting). Their best guess is it was a wash.
If you factor in an early treatment protocol if you
get sick, then it isn’t a close call: just say no and
if you get infected and then treat it early. And I
challenge the CDC to show the actual numbers to prove
I’m wrong (I’m happy to be wrong by the way… it does
happen on occasion).</li>
<li>Finally, not everyone will agree with me. I wouldn’t
have gone through the trouble to write all this if I
didn’t believe it was all true. I could be wrong. The
FDA isn’t seeing a safety signal. But the FDA isn’t
known for going out and talking to people in the real
world and collecting data that way. They rely on
official sources that can be grossly under-reporting
the side effects in order not to scare anyone from
taking the vaccine. I’m not making this up; there are
lots of doctors that would vouch for what I’m saying.
<a
href="https://trialsitenews.com/bioethics-of-experimental-covid-vaccine-deployment-under-eua-its-time-we-stop-and-look-at-whats-going-down/"
moz-do-not-send="true">Check out Robert Malone’s
article, for example</a> where he refers to this
censorship of evidence as “alarming.” Malone is the
inventor of the mRNA vaccine! So I’m not worried that
the FDA sees different data than I do. I’m in good
company with Malone.</li>
<li>Right now, the mechanisms of action point to putting
your body at much greater risk than a natural COVID
infection would cause. The natural COVID infection
travels slowly through your body; the vaccine takes
about 15 minutes to set fire to every part of your
body at the same time (and the biggest fire is in your
ovaries). This is why, when you do have a side effect
from the vaccine, it can happen anywhere. You never
see that with a natural infection. You get immunity
either way. Some think natural immunity is broader and
more durable, others disagree. But I think we are
splitting hairs at this point.</li>
<li>Lastly, let me address the elephant in the room.
Some people have told me not to write this article.
They believe that the upside of herd immunity and
returning to normal outweighs the damage that is
inflicted by the vaccine (which they believe is 100
deaths and no disabilities). I have several reasons
for not agreeing: 1) the evidence on the table is all
consistent with the hypothesis of a very destructive
vaccine that has devastated a LOT of people, 2) they
can fix the product quickly if they prioritize it, 3)
if they kick Fauci and Lane out and replace them with
reasonable people (in the mold of Michael J Ryan), we
can get the drugs we need put on the NIH recommended
list so if anyone does get COVID, it will be short
lived and mild, and 4) this vaccine has the potential
to wreak havoc on the reproductive system of our kids;
if they can’t even tell us how many people have died
and been disabled from the vaccine so far, I have
little faith in their ability to project 9 months or
more in the future. We know the toxic S1 subunit
accumulates in the ovaries (see chart below; search
for “Still Unconvinced”). Prove to me this isn’t a
problem because it looks like it could well be a major
train wreck to me. There is simply no way that <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/22/health/cdc-heart-teens-vaccination.html"
moz-do-not-send="true">after dozens of healthy kids
have reported myocarditis and pericarditis</a>
(still unexplained by the CDC) that this vaccine could
be anywhere close to safe. Nothing happens on a flu
shot. This is off the charts and the dozens of kids
affected is just the tip of the iceberg and this is
just one of hundreds of symptoms caused by the
vaccine. What the CDC observed in those kids is
perfectly consistent with the narrative I outline
here. In short, my explanation of what is happening
here, and my assertion that the vaccine is causing
harm to healthy people, matches reality. Their
narrative (“it is perfectly safe”) does not. So,
sorry, I’m not buying it. And I’m hardly alone in this
belief:</li>
</ol>
<div>
<figure><img
src="https://trialsitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/image-6.png"
alt="" moz-do-not-send="true" width="500"
height="825"><figcaption>French agency is thinking
clearly. Not everyone was fooled.</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>If you believe everything I wrote above (or a trusted
friend told you this is on the level), you can stop
reading here.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</body>
</html>