<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p> </p>
    <div class="container">
      <div class="l-2col book__cover">(tja, inderdaad... een soort
        kortsluiting)</div>
      <div class="l-2col book__cover"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="l-2col book__cover"><img class="book__img matchheight"
          title="What IS Sex?" alt="What IS Sex?"
src="https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/styles/large_book_cover/http/mitp-content-server.mit.edu%3A18180/books/covers/cover/%3Fcollid%3Dbooks_covers_0%26isbn%3D9780262534130%26type%3D.jpg?itok=7YaGXlg0"
          width="386" height="579">
        <div class="book-icons"> </div>
      </div>
      <div class="l-3col">
        <p class="book__series"> From <a
            href="https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/series/short-circuits">
            Short Circuits </a></p>
        <h1 class="book__title"> What IS Sex? </h1>
        <span class="book__authors">
          <p>By <a
              href="https://mitpress.mit.edu/contributors/alenka-zupancic">Alenka
              Zupančič</a></p>
        </span>
        <div class="book__blurb">
          <div class="tab-content__rail-item">
            <h4 class="tab-content__rail-title">Paperback</h4>
            <span> <span> $22.95 <span content="USD"></span> T </span>
            </span> <span>ISBN: <span>9780262534130</span></span> <span><span>168</span>
              pp. | 6 in x 9 in</span> <span>6 b&w illus.</span> <time
              content="2017-09-08">September 2017</time> <br>
          </div>
          <div class="tab-content__rail-item"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="tab-content__rail-item"><br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div class="book__blurb"> Why sexuality is at the point of a
          “short circuit” between ontology and epistemology.
          <aside class="rail rail__endorsement award-rail">
            <h3 class="rail-title">Endorsement </h3>
          </aside>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <aside class="rail rail__endorsement award-rail">
      <div class="rail-block award-rail__block is-open"
        id="rail-endorsement">
        <p class="mq">Zupančič's latest work takes your breath away. It
          is a pathbreaking discovery of the philosophical wager at the
          heart of the psychoanalytic project. Zupančič forces us to
          confront for the first time the ontological significance of
          sex.</p>
        <p class="mqr">Todd McGowan</p>
        <p class="mqa">Professor of English, University of Vermont;
          author of Capitalism and Desire</p>
      </div>
    </aside>
    Summary
    <div class="slick-track" style="opacity: 1; width: 2682px;
      transform: translate3d(0px, 0px, 0px);">
      <div class="swipe-tab-content overview-tab slick-slide
        slick-current slick-active" tabindex="0" data-slick-index="0"
        aria-hidden="false" style="width: 894px;">
        <div class="l-tabs--left">
          <div>
            <p> <b>Why sexuality is at the point of a “short circuit”
                between ontology and epistemology.</b> </p>
            <p>Consider sublimation—conventionally understood as a
              substitute satisfaction for missing sexual satisfaction.
              But what if, as Lacan claims, we can get exactly the same
              satisfaction that we get from sex from talking (or
              writing, painting, praying, or other activities)? The
              point is not to explain the satisfaction from talking by
              pointing to its sexual origin, but that the satisfaction
              from talking is itself sexual. The satisfaction from
              talking contains a key to sexual satisfaction (and not the
              other way around)—even a key to sexuality itself and its
              inherent contradictions. The Lacanian perspective would
              make the answer to the simple-seeming question, “What is
              sex?” rather more complex. In this volume in the Short
              Circuits series, Alenka Zupančič approaches the question
              from just this perspective, considering sexuality a
              properly philosophical problem for psychoanalysis; and by
              psychoanalysis, she means that of Freud and Lacan, not
              that of the kind of clinician practitioners called by
              Lacan “orthopedists of the unconscious.” </p>
            <p>Zupančič argues that sexuality is at the point of a
              “short circuit” between ontology and epistemology.
              Sexuality and knowledge are structured around a
              fundamental negativity, which unites them at the point of
              the unconscious. The unconscious (as linked to sexuality)
              is the concept of an inherent link between being and
              knowledge in their very negativity.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>