[D66] [JD: 166] Shell boss: we have no plans to change strategy despite emissions ruling

[R.O.]

theguardian.com
<https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/jul/29/shell-raises-dividend-soaring-oil-prices>



  Shell boss: we have no plans to change strategy despite emissions ruling

Jillian Ambrose
4-5 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Royal Dutch Shell has no plans to change its strategy despite a landmark
Netherlands court ruling calling for the company to make a 45% cut to
its carbon emissions by the end of the decade, according to the oil
giant’s chief executive.

Ben van Beurden denied the company would need to change its plans to
meet the tougher court-ordered climate targets on Thursday, as he
revealed a multibillion-dollar shareholder windfall for investors and
better-than-expected quarterly profits.

Shell plans to appeal against the court’s ruling, which was handed down
shortly after 30% of its shareholders, including some of its biggest
investors, rebelled against the board’s strategy
<https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/may/18/shell-faces-shareholder-rebellion-over-fossil-fuel-production>.
They voted in favour of activist investors who want Shell to set firm
targets to wind down fossil fuel production.

“I don’t think we’ll come up with a new strategy,” Van Beurden said.
“Our strategy is very much aligned with what the plaintiffs would want
us to do, which is working on our own emissions reduction, and also
helping customers reduce emissions.”

Shell plans to reduce the average carbon intensity of the energy it
produces by 20% by 2030, well short of the court’s ruling. But Van
Beurden said asking “one company” to reduce emissions by 45% when oil
industry rivals and EU states plan to achieve only half these reductions
over the same period is “not only unreasonable but doubly ineffective”.

The oil boss also dismissed concerns over Shell’s plan to help
private-equity backed Siccar Point to explore for new UK oil reserves in
the Cambo oilfield near Shetland, despite warnings from the
International Energy Agency that the world cannot afford any new fossil
fuel developments
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/may/18/no-new-investment-in-fossil-fuels-demands-top-energy-economist>
if it hopes to prevent catastrophic global heating.

“For as long as the UK still needs oil and gas in its [energy]
consumption, it’s better to produce in its own backyard,” he said. “To
import oil and gas, which would be the alternative, would obviously not
serve the climate at all. Symbolically, it’s not what people would like
to hear. But symbolism won’t help us with climate change.”

The Cambo oilfield expansion could ignite a legal challenge by
Greenpeace against the government on the grounds that the new
exploration would undermine the UK’s climate targets, and the
government’s recent pledge to allow new oil exploration only if it
aligns with climate targets
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/mar/24/uk-government-to-allow-new-north-sea-oil-and-gas-exploration>.

Van Beurden mounted his defence of Shell’s ongoing fossil fuel
production as the company raised its dividend by almost 40% and
kickstarted share buybacks worth $2bn (£1.4bn) and soaring global oil
prices helped to fuel a sharp rise in quarterly profits.


It reported its highest profits in two years for the three months to the
end of June after a steady rise in global energy prices. Its
second-quarter profits climbed to $5.5bn from $3.2bn in the same period
last year, about 9% higher than forecast by City analysts.

Van Beurden said the company was “stepping up” shareholder distributions
by increasing dividends and kickstarting share buybacks “while we
continue to invest for the future of energy
<https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/jul/16/shell-scottish-power-floating-offshore-windfarms-energy-scotland>”.
“We wanted to be really clear and signal to the market the confidence
that we have in our prospects and our cashflows,” he said.

Despite the shareholder sweetener, Shell’s share price remains well
below where it traded before the outbreak of Covid-19, even as oil
prices have recovered to pre-pandemic levels. Despite rising on Thursday
morning, the shares were up to only 1,432p, compared with 2,298p in
January 2020.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tuxtown.net/pipermail/d66/attachments/20210807/29879a7a/attachment-0001.html>