[D66] If the Future Isn't Somehow Primitive, There Won't Be a Future
R.O.
jugg at ziggo.nl
Wed Jul 1 14:52:12 CEST 2020
https://www.johnzerzan.net/articles/disinfo.html
If the Future Isn't Somehow Primitive, There Won't Be a Future
Interview with Brian Whitney for Disinfo, January 22, 2016
John Zerzan isn’t on a list. John Zerzan is the list. He is perhaps the
most preeminent philosopher and author out there who is not only against
modern technology, but isn’t a fan of the whole civilization thing you
are so into either. If this is not enough to freak out the government
watchdogs, he is an anarchist. Oh, and then there was his friendship
with the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynkski.
But those aren’t the main reasons Zerzan would be on a government watch
list. He would be on one mostly because he makes a lot of sense. He
answered some questions for me concerning what he believes about how we
are all living our lives, and about his new book Why Hope published by
the consistently awesome Feral House.
You have been called an anarcho-primitivist, and a eco-anarchist. For
the uninitiated, can you give us an idea of your world view?
In sum, anarcho-primitivism is the conclusion that if the future isn’t
somehow primitive, there won’t be a future. Every past civilization has
failed and this one, the only one left, is rapidly on the road to
self-destruction. The key force or ethos of civilization is
domestication, starting with animals and plants and always going
forward. It is control, ever deepening and extending, including
nanotechnology and total surveillance. Free life disappears along with
the health of the biosphere itself. This or that reform which does not
tackle the nature of civ, which is domestication, is superficial and futile.
In 1994 you wrote in your book Future Primitive and Other Essays you
said “Never before have people been so infantalized, made so dependent
on the machine for everything; as the earth rapidly approaches its
extinction due to technology, our souls are shrunk and flattened by its
pervasive rule.” How do you feel things have gone in the 20 years since
then?
That quote is even more obviously valid now than it was in 1994. In fact
the pace of the thing has increased. Extinction of species, empty lives,
the whole pathological totality worsens. Now we have rampage shootings
as an everyday phenomenon, rising chronic illnesses and suicide rates
and a more and more poisoned physical environment, to mention just a bit
of it. Hollow lives staring at screens, the sense of no future, the
direction could not be more stark. Avoidance, denial are understandable
given how bad it’s getting but facing up to reality must happen.
What do you consider the most positive aspects of a hunter-gatherer
society as opposed to a modern one.
I think the main plus is that hunter-gatherer life was face-to-face. In
band society people were accountable, had to take responsibility.
Whereas in mass society we have the opposite. Today, because of not
despite technology.we are more and more isolated. Community, the
fundamental aspect of non-domesticated and non-industrial life, is gone.
Full stop. Hence the shootings, by unmoored individuals, belonging to
nothing. Less work, too. Civilization means always more work, not to
mention chronic war and the objectification of women.
I know you are probably a bit tired, or really tired, of talking about
it, but can you touch on your relationship with Ted Kacynski?
Kevin Tucker and I found Kacynski making dishonest use of sources in his
critique of anarcho-primitivism. That cannot be tolerated. One may think
that anarcho-primitivism bases itself on faulty grounding but we try
very hard to be scrupulous about the evidence, e.g. anthropological
evidence. Bad faith blocks discourse about disagreements. Dialog is
essential but some things prevent it.
You said in an recent interview your book Why Hope that your book was
addressing the “nihilism and retreat within the anarchist movement”. Why
should we care what happens to us, or the world at this point?
For those who don’t care about themselves or the world, all ideas are
irrelevant, eh? Our work is not for cynics or others who prefer surrender.
More information about the D66
mailing list