[D66] Holocaust Memorial Day: remembering the psychiatric patients who were victims of Nazi persecution
A.OUT
jugg at ziggo.nl
Mon Jan 27 14:02:29 CET 2020
https://www.vergetenslachtoffers.nl/
On 27-01-2020 13:37, A.OUT wrote:
> Het feit dat ze van de Holocaust een uitsluitend joodse aangelegenheid
> maken zie je wel aan het dragen van keppeltjes bij de ceremonie's.
> Minderheden die ook slachtoffer werden, worden niet herdacht.
> Nederlanders kijken wederom weg... (Niet verrassend in een 'land'
> waarbij euthanasie van psychiatrische patienten genormaliseerd is.)
>
> On 27-01-2020 10:29, A.OUT wrote:
>> (Hier hoor je Rutte dus niet over. Het gaat alleen maar over de
>> jodenvervolging.)
>>
>> https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/blog/holocaust-memorial-day-remembering-psychiatric-patients-who-were-victims-nazi-persecution
>>
>>
>> Holocaust Memorial Day: remembering the psychiatric patients who were
>> victims of Nazi persecution
>> 27 January 2017
>>
>> We’re all familiar with the horror of the Nazi attempts to annihilate
>> the Jewish population in the 1940s – the Holocaust.
>>
>> One of the less well-known aspects of Nazi policy was the genocide
>> that included the slaughter of up to 275,0001 psychiatric patients.
>> The majority of them, like me, had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. A
>> further 400,000 people were sterilised on medical grounds.
>>
>> Nazi persecution
>>
>> Between 1941 and 1945, the Nazis attempted to kill all Jewish people
>> in Europe. This is known as the Holocaust (The Shoah in Hebrew). In
>> addition, the Nazis targeted gypsies, black people, Slavic people, gay
>> people, people with disabilities political opponents and those whose
>> religious beliefs conflicted with Nazi ideology.
>>
>> This year’s theme for Holocaust Memorial Day is “how can life go on?”
>> It includes remembering past events, encouraging us to consider how we
>> are facing hate today and how we can help people from persecuted
>> groups to ensure that life goes on in the face of hate and persecution.
>>
>> With these themes in mind, consider some of the arguments used to
>> promote the murderous policy adopted toward psychiatric patients and
>> why we must be aware of the impact this thinking could have now and in
>> the future.
>>
>> In the 1930s the eugenics movement was well established in the US and
>> UK. The work of Ernst Rüdin and Franz Kallmann reinforced this - they
>> believed that schizophrenia was simply an inherited disease. It became
>> part of the quest for rassenhygiene (racial hygiene), which drove the
>> Holocaust with mass murder at its core.
>>
>> But this interpretation of the science was by no means the only
>> driver. One early motivation was cutting the cost of care for
>> psychiatric patients. Funding for care decreased as demand increased.2
>>
>> In 1920, Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche published Permission for the
>> Destruction of Life Unworthy of Life. In it, they asked the question
>> “Is there human life [whose] prolongation represents a perpetual loss
>> of value, both for its bearer and for society as a whole?” They
>> answered this by describing patients as “mentally dead”. This argument
>> was repeated in, among others, The Eradication of the Less Valuable
>> from Society.2
>>
>> Hitler adopted these arguments. The result was a memorandum on "the
>> destruction of life unworthy of life" and a draft law that included
>> the following provision:
>>
>> "The life of a person who, because of incurable mental illness,
>> requires permanent institutionalisation and is not able to sustain an
>> independent existence, may be prematurely terminated by medical
>> measures in a painless and covert manner. Selected professors of
>> psychiatry and asylum directors, known to be sympathetic to the plan,
>> were asked to comment on the draft. All agreed that such a programme
>> was necessary." 1,2,3
>>
>> On 1 September 1939, Hitler wrote a letter authorising the programme
>> to kill psychiatric patients and, from October that year, a committee
>> of psychiatrists assessed all patients. The committee identified the
>> first 70,000 patients who were to die as part of the policy. By August
>> 1941, records showed that 70,273 patients had been killed.
>>
>> The killing continued throughout the war. The exact figures are
>> unknown but the best estimates give us 200,000-275,000, with a further
>> 400,000 subjected to forced sterilisation.
>>
>> In short, the murder of about a quarter of a million, just like many
>> of our fellow citizens who today thrive in their families and
>> workplaces, was based on poor science, cost cutting, economic
>> prejudice, propaganda and media portrayals which presented us as
>> worthless substandard human beings.
>>
>> What implications does this have for the present day?
>>
>> In Nazi Germany, a diagnosis of schizophrenia was a death sentence.
>> Today it merely reduces life expectancy by 10-25 years (Laursen,
>> Munk-Olsen, & Vestergaard, 2012). Thankfully, in large part attitudes
>> towards people living with mental health problems have improved
>> dramatically. However, this isn’t to say that discrimination doesn’t
>> exist. We must remain ever vigilant.
>>
>> There is no better time to remember the importance of behaving as a
>> whole community. We must never forget what happens when hatred,
>> discrimination, poor science and blaming community problems on the
>> most disadvantaged in communities goes unchallenged.
>>
>> References
>>
>> Torrey, E. F., & Yolken, R. H. (2010). Psychiatric genocide: Nazi
>> attempts to eradicate schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(1),
>> 26–32. http://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp097
>> Burleigh, M. (1994). Death and Deliverance: “Euthanasia” in
>> Germany c. 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
>> Muller-Hill, B. (1988). Murderous Science. Elimination by
>> Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and Others, Germany, 1933-1945.
>> New York, United States: Oxford University Press.
>> http://doi.org/10.1126/science.241.4866.730
>> Laursen, T. M., Munk-Olsen, T., & Vestergaard, M. (2012). Life
>> expectancy and cardiovascular mortality in persons with schizophrenia.
>> Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 25(2), 83–88.
>> http://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32835035ca
>> _______________________________________________
>> D66 mailing list
>> D66 at tuxtown.net
>> http://www.tuxtown.net/mailman/listinfo/d66
> _______________________________________________
> D66 mailing list
> D66 at tuxtown.net
> http://www.tuxtown.net/mailman/listinfo/d66
More information about the D66
mailing list