[D66] Holocaust Memorial Day: remembering the psychiatric patients who were victims of Nazi persecution

A.OUT jugg at ziggo.nl
Mon Jan 27 10:29:08 CET 2020


(Hier hoor je Rutte dus niet over. Het gaat alleen maar over de 
jodenvervolging.)

https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/blog/holocaust-memorial-day-remembering-psychiatric-patients-who-were-victims-nazi-persecution

Holocaust Memorial Day: remembering the psychiatric patients who were 
victims of Nazi persecution
27 January 2017

We’re all familiar with the horror of the Nazi attempts to annihilate 
the Jewish population in the 1940s – the Holocaust.

One of the less well-known aspects of Nazi policy was the genocide that 
included the slaughter of up to 275,0001 psychiatric patients. The 
majority of them, like me, had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. A further 
400,000 people were sterilised on medical grounds.

Nazi persecution

Between 1941 and 1945, the Nazis attempted to kill all Jewish people in 
Europe. This is known as the Holocaust (The Shoah in Hebrew). In 
addition, the Nazis targeted gypsies, black people, Slavic people, gay 
people, people with disabilities political opponents and those whose 
religious beliefs conflicted with Nazi ideology.

This year’s theme for Holocaust Memorial Day is “how can life go on?” It 
includes remembering past events, encouraging us to consider how we are 
facing hate today and how we can help people from persecuted groups to 
ensure that life goes on in the face of hate and persecution.

With these themes in mind, consider some of the arguments used to 
promote the murderous policy adopted toward psychiatric patients and why 
we must be aware of the impact this thinking could have now and in the 
future.

In the 1930s the eugenics movement was well established in the US and 
UK. The work of Ernst Rüdin and Franz Kallmann reinforced this - they 
believed that schizophrenia was simply an inherited disease. It became 
part of the quest for rassenhygiene (racial hygiene), which drove the 
Holocaust with mass murder at its core.

But this interpretation of the science was by no means the only driver. 
One early motivation was cutting the cost of care for psychiatric 
patients. Funding for care decreased as demand increased.2

In 1920, Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche published Permission for the 
Destruction of Life Unworthy of Life. In it, they asked the question “Is 
there human life [whose] prolongation represents a perpetual loss of 
value, both for its bearer and for society as a whole?” They answered 
this by describing patients as “mentally dead”. This argument was 
repeated in, among others, The Eradication of the Less Valuable from 
Society.2

Hitler adopted these arguments. The result was a memorandum on "the 
destruction of life unworthy of life" and a draft law that included the 
following provision:

"The life of a person who, because of incurable mental illness, requires 
permanent institutionalisation and is not able to sustain an independent 
existence, may be prematurely terminated by medical measures in a 
painless and covert manner. Selected professors of psychiatry and asylum 
directors, known to be sympathetic to the plan, were asked to comment on 
the draft. All agreed that such a programme was necessary." 1,2,3

On 1 September 1939, Hitler wrote a letter authorising the programme to 
kill psychiatric patients and, from October that year, a committee of 
psychiatrists assessed all patients. The committee identified the first 
70,000 patients who were to die as part of the policy. By August 1941, 
records showed that 70,273 patients had been killed.

The killing continued throughout the war. The exact figures are unknown 
but the best estimates give us 200,000-275,000, with a further 400,000 
subjected to forced sterilisation.

In short, the murder of about a quarter of a million,  just like many of 
our fellow citizens who today thrive in their families and workplaces, 
was based on poor science, cost cutting, economic prejudice, propaganda 
and media portrayals which presented us as worthless substandard human 
beings.

What implications does this have for the present day?

In Nazi Germany, a diagnosis of schizophrenia was a death sentence. 
Today it merely reduces life expectancy by 10-25 years (Laursen, 
Munk-Olsen, & Vestergaard, 2012). Thankfully, in large part attitudes 
towards people living with mental health problems have improved 
dramatically. However, this isn’t to say that discrimination doesn’t 
exist. We must remain ever vigilant.

There is no better time to remember the importance of behaving as a 
whole community. We must never forget what happens when hatred, 
discrimination, poor science and blaming community problems on the most 
disadvantaged in communities goes unchallenged.

References

     Torrey, E. F., & Yolken, R. H. (2010). Psychiatric genocide: Nazi 
attempts to eradicate schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(1), 
26–32. http://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp097
     Burleigh, M. (1994). Death and Deliverance: “Euthanasia” in Germany 
c. 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Muller-Hill, B. (1988). Murderous Science. Elimination by 
Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and Others, Germany, 1933-1945. 
New York, United States: Oxford University Press. 
http://doi.org/10.1126/science.241.4866.730
     Laursen, T. M., Munk-Olsen, T., & Vestergaard, M. (2012). Life 
expectancy and cardiovascular mortality in persons with schizophrenia. 
Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 25(2), 83–88. 
http://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32835035ca


More information about the D66 mailing list