[D66] The oligarchs’ election

[J.N.]

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/08/03/pers-a03.html

The oligarchs’ election
3 August 2015

Reports filed earlier this month with the Federal Election Commission
(FEC) confirm that the US political system is completely dominated by
the super-rich. The figures are so staggering, and so at odds with the
conventional claims that the United States is a democracy, that even the
corporate-controlled media has been compelled to take notice.

Below are some representative headlines that appeared over the weekend:

Small Pool of Rich Donors Dominates Election Giving—New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/02/us/small-pool-of-rich-donors-dominates-election-giving.html?ref=politics

Million-dollar donors pump huge sums into 2016 White House
race—Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/million-dollar-donors-pump-huge-sums-into-2016-white-house-race/2015/07/31/e2befec4-37b8-11e5-9739-170df8af8eb9_story.html

Data: Nearly 5 dozen give a third of all ’16 campaign cash—Associated Press
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/bf6d02ab51cf4032baf95a91d7780a29/data-nearly-5-dozen-give-third-all-16-campaign-cash

67 donors and gusher of cash change 2016 race—Politico.com
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/wealthy-donors-and-gusher-of-cash-change-2016-race-120894.html

Each of these reports relies on the figures from the FEC to document the
role of a tiny group of extraordinarily wealthy contributors in shaping
the course of the 2016 presidential campaign in both the Democratic and
Republican parties. The bulk of this money has been channeled through
so-called super PACs, the nominally independent political action
committees called into existence by the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in
the Citizens United case, which legalized unlimited political
contributions by millionaires and billionaires.

A few of the most important figures are worth citing:

* Fewer than 400 families account for nearly half of the $388 million
raised by June 30 for the 2016 campaign.

* Just 130 families provide more than half of the super PAC money raised
for Republican candidates.

* Some 67 donors have kicked in more than $1 million apiece, nearly half
of them in the camp of Jeb Bush, who leads the fundraising race with
$119 million.

* Super PAC fundraising has shot up ten-fold since the last presidential
campaign, from $26 million at this point in 2011 to $258 million this
year, nearly two-thirds of the total campaign cash that has been raised.

Perhaps the most naked expression of the dominant role of big money is
the weekend event held by the billionaire brothers Charles and Edward
Koch. They invited five of the Republican hopefuls to audition before an
audience of 450 like-minded reactionary money men. The Koch brothers
alone have pledged to pump $900 million into electing a Republican
president and Congress. Republican strategist Mark McKinnon told the New
York Times, “For that kind of money you could buy a president. Oh right.
That’s the point.”

The fundraising figures help explain the proliferation of Republican
candidates, as 13 of the 17 depend on a handful of wealthy supporters to
fund their campaigns. Four donors account for two-thirds of the super
PAC money for Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker; four donors account for
three quarters of the funding for Senator Marco Rubio; three donors
account for nearly all the funding for Senator Ted Cruz; two investors
fund Senator Rand Paul’s campaign; one poultry magnate is keeping former
Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee’s campaign afloat. In the case of Donald
Trump, one donor, the billionaire himself, accounts for 100 percent of
his funding.

The Democratic campaign, in terms of the number of candidates, offers
the inverse of the Republican. Hillary Clinton became the prohibitive
favorite because she was the only candidate with significant backing
from the financial oligarchy. Already, eight individuals have given $1
million or more to one of Clinton’s super PACs, with Wall Street and
Hollywood the main contributors.

Clinton released eight years of tax returns on Friday, documents that
certify the Clintons’ entrance into the financial elite—at least its
lower rungs. They made $139 million in adjusted gross income from 2007
to 2014, mainly from speaking fees and books. The former secretary of
state gave three speeches to Goldman Sachs, one of the main financial
criminals of the 2008 Wall Street crash, for a total of $675,000.

In a little-noticed commentary on a national radio program Tuesday,
former President Jimmy Carter said that money had completely corrupted
the political system of the United States. “Now it’s just an oligarchy,”
he said, “with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting
the nominations for president or to elect the president. And the same
thing applies to governors and US senators and Congress members.”

Carter has become something of a Cassandra in recent years, cautioning
the US ruling elite that it has become so corrupt, reactionary and
anti-democratic, so reckless in its militarism, that it risks losing all
political legitimacy. His latest warning will be ignored like all the
others.

The pleas from Carter, or the editors of the New York Times, to somewhat
insulate the political system from the influence of big money are both
pathetic and futile. What is emerging in the corruption and filth of the
2016 US presidential election is the essence of capitalist politics—the
dictatorship of the financial overlords who dominate every aspect of
American society.

There is no quarantining money from politics. The only way to purge the
oligarchs from politics is to purge the oligarchs.

The fortunes of the billionaires, amassed through financial fraud,
market manipulation and brutal exploitation, must be confiscated and
made available to serve the needs of working people. This will be an
essential component of the socialist reorganization of economic life as
a whole, including the nationalization of the banks and basic industry,
and the establishment of a rationally planned economy under democratic
control.

Patrick Martin