[D66] Democrats, Republicans criticize leaks, not drone murders

[Antid Oto]

Democrats, Republicans criticize leaks, not drone murders
By Patrick Martin
9 June 2012

At an extraordinary press conference Thursday, the top Democrats and Republicans
on the House and Senate intelligence committees denounced leaks to the press
about US drone missile attacks and other covert actions. They objected, not to
the violations of international law being carried out by the Obama
administration, but to media reports making these violations known to the
American people.

The bipartisan backing for censorship and cover-up followed a closed-door
briefing for selected senators and congressmen by James R. Clapper, the director
of national intelligence, and Robert S. Mueller, director of the FBI. The
briefing reportedly focused on several recent leak-based stories in the major US
media:

* A May 9 report in the Associated Press, the Wall Street Journal and other
publications that a US double agent in Yemen had exposed and disrupted Al Qaeda
plans to bomb targets in the United States

* A May 16 report in the Washington Post about the Obama administration
sanctioning secret arms transfers to the Syrian rebels and providing them
military training

* A May 29 report in the New York Times detailing President Obama’s personal
role in approving a “kill list” of targets for US drone missile strikes

* A May 29 report in Newsweek magazine, excerpting more details about the drone
missile attacks reported in a book by Newsweek staffer Daniel Klaidman

* A June 1 report in the New York Times confirming the US-Israeli collaboration
in devising the Stuxnet worm and introducing it into the computer systems of
Iran’s nuclear program, causing considerable damage

These press reports cited as sources top US intelligence and military officials,
as well as White House aides, all speaking anonymously, all presenting these
covert operations as successful efforts by the Obama administration to target
the enemies of American imperialism.

The four legislators who held the press conference Thursday were Chairman of the
Senate Intelligence Committee Diane Feinstein, a Democrat; the Republican
vice-chairman, Saxby Chambliss; Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee
Mike Rogers, a Republican; and the ranking Democrat on the committee, C. A.
Ruppersberger.

A joint statement issued by the four on Wednesday declared, “In recent weeks, we
have become increasingly concerned at the continued leaks regarding sensitive
intelligence programs and activities including specific details of sources and
methods… The accelerating pace of such disclosures, the sensitivity of the
matters in question, and the harm caused to our national security interests is
alarming and unacceptable.”

All four reiterated this position at their joint press conference Thursday,
denouncing the leaks as a threat to US national security, while endorsing the
operations detailed in those leaks, which constitute a series of criminal acts
of war under international law.

The US operations against Syria and Iran are both brazen acts of international
aggression, while the use of drone-fired missiles to assassinate targeted
individuals as well as groups of unidentified but “suspected” terrorists is
nothing short of murder.

The description in the New York Times of the White House decision-making process
in selecting targets for drone attacks could be entered as evidence in a future
war crimes tribunal. According to the Times account, Obama has established the
principle that any military-age male in a target zone may be killed as a
presumed terrorist, regardless of his actual status. Such deliberate and
indiscriminate targeting of civilians is a flagrant violation of the Geneva
Conventions.

The remarks of the senators and congressmen, Democrats and Republicans alike,
focused on the damage that these news report had done to ongoing US covert
operations—including, no doubt, murderous activities that these four plugged-in
officials know about but which have not yet been made public.

The Democrats were vociferous. Feinstein declared, referring to the leaks, “This
has to stop.” Ruppersberger said, “This is one of the most serious breaches in
the last couple articles that have come out that I have seen. It puts us at
risk. It puts lives at risk.”

The operations detailed in these press reports have caused the deaths of
hundreds if not thousands of innocent people in Yemen, Pakistan, Syria,
Afghanistan and other countries. But that is not what concerns the Democratic
and Republican officials.

The joint statement instead warned, “Each disclosure puts American lives at
risk, makes it more difficult to recruit assets, strains the trust of our
partners, and threatens imminent and irreparable damage to our national security
in the face of urgent and rapidly adapting threats worldwide.”

Despite the fulminations on Capitol Hill, the news reports of the past few weeks
hardly amount to an exposure of US covert operations. Most of the articles are
written in an entirely supportive, even fawning, tone, and give details that
present the US government and its most murderous agencies in an entirely
favorable light. Moreover, those details could only have been provided by
intelligence and military operatives and close personal aides of Obama, who were
the driving force of the press revelations.

This reality has led sections of the Republican Party to complain that Obama is
using the CIA and military actions to boost his reelection campaign—a charge
that is certainly true, since the media barrage began with the White House
celebration of the first anniversary of the Navy Seals raid that killed Osama
bin Laden on May 2.

One prominent Democrat, Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, denied that “the public had to know” about the Stuxnet
software virus, despite admitting that it was a “fundamental national security
issue.” He came close to characterizing the Times’ report as treasonous, saying,
“I don’t see how the public interest is well served by it. I do see how other
interests outside the United States are well served by it.”

The response of the Times to such bullying was to grovel. Managing Editor Dean
Baquet issued a statement Wednesday defending publication of the Stuxnet story,
and revealing the role of the newspaper as a virtual organ of the intelligence
apparatus. “As always with sensitive stories,” he wrote, “we described the piece
to the government before publication. No one suggested we not publish.”

The two Democrats and two Republicans on the intelligence committees called on
the Obama administration to crack down on unauthorized leaks, saying, they
intend to “press the executive branch to take tangible and demonstrable steps to
detect and deter intelligence leaks, and to fully, fairly, and impartially
investigate the disclosures that have taken place.”

They are knocking on an open door, since the Obama administration has already
launched more investigations and prosecutions of supposed leakers than all
previous US governments combined.

The most notorious and reactionary case is the persecution of Army Private
Bradley Manning, accused of supplying the WikiLeaks web site with after-action
reports and gun-camera footage documenting American war crimes in Iraq and
Afghanistan, as well as hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables detailing the
machinations of US imperialism around the world. A military judge was scheduled
to rule Friday on defense motions to dismiss 10 of the 22 charges against Manning.

http://wsws.org/articles/2012/jun2012/leak-j09.shtml