[D66] NATO prepares bloodbath in Sirte

Bert Bakker bertbakker7 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 2 09:51:29 CEST 2011


Wat een merkwaardige observatie, "Nato prepares bloodbath in Sirte".
Als Ghadaffi zich nu gewonnen geeft, is de oorlog voorbij.
Of wordt hij door de internationale socialisten nog steeds beschouwd als een
held der arbeidersklasse?





2011/9/2 Antid Oto <protocosmos66 at gmail.com>

> NATO prepares bloodbath in Sirte
> 1 September 2011
>
> Nearly six months after securing a United Nations Security Council
> resolution
> authorizing a no-fly zone in Libya and the use of “all necessary measures…
> to
> protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack,” the
> US
> and its NATO allies, former colonial powers, are mounting a barbaric siege
> of a
> major population center that threatens to produce civilian casualties on a
> mass
> scale.
>
> In their breathless promotion of the “final battle” to realize the real
> US-NATO
> aim in Libya—regime-change—few in the Western media have bothered to
> consider
> the fact that the major imperialist powers are carrying out precisely the
> kind
> of act they claimed their war was designed to prevent.
>
> Gaddafi’s troops were marching on Benghazi, the world was told, and only a
> “humanitarian” intervention by NATO could save the city’s innocent
> population.
> Now the “rebels” are encircling Sirte, led by British and Qatari special
> forces
> troops, intelligence operatives and mercenary military contractors, while
> the
> city’s population is being pounded by NATO bombs and cut off from food,
> fuel and
> all basic supplies.
>
> The sheer contempt shown by the US and the Western European powers for
> legality
> and world public opinion is breathtaking. The pretense that NATO is acting
> under
> the terms of the UN resolution that provided a fig leaf for its
> intervention is
> more than absurd; it has become obscene.
>
> One has to go back to the crimes of the fascist powers in the 1930s and
> 1940s to
> search for parallels to such a siege: the bombing of Guernica in the
> Spanish
> Civil War, the siege of Leningrad and the Warsaw Ghetto.
>
> NATO warplanes have over the past few days conducted scores of air strikes
> against Sirte, the town of Bani Walid to its west and the roads linking the
> two.
> While there have been no independent reports from Sirte, the spokesman for
> the
> Gaddafi regime, Moussa Ibrahim, reported that the continuous bomb and
> missile
> attacks have killed 1,000 people in the city and left many more wounded.
>
> Part of this ferocious air assault is aimed at assassinating Colonel
> Muammar
> Gaddafi, who is believed by some to have taken refuge in the city or its
> surrounding area. Western special forces are reportedly on the ground
> hunting
> for Gaddafi, while an array of US spy planes have been deployed to pinpoint
> his
> whereabouts.
>
> The NATO-led rebels have taken up positions on the main coastal highway
> both
> east and west of Sirte, with orders to stay in place until the NATO
> blitzkrieg
> has sufficiently annihilated the city’s defenders.
>
> The National Transitional Council (NTC), the self-appointed body of
> ex-Gaddafi
> ministers, Western intelligence assets, Islamists and tribal functionaries
> that
> has been recognized by the major powers as the legitimate government of
> Libya,
> has announced a surrender-or-die ultimatum to the city. If a surrender is
> not
> forthcoming by Saturday, they say, the city will be subjected to military
> assault.
>
> “We have been given no indication of a peaceful surrender,” an NTC military
> spokesman, Col. Ahmed Omar Bani, told a press conference in Benghazi. “We
> continue to seek a peaceful solution, but on Saturday we will use different
> methods against these criminals.”
>
> “Sometimes to avoid bloodshed you must shed blood, and the faster we do
> this the
> less blood we will shed,” said Ali Tarhouni, the deputy head of the NTC.
>
> The Western media is justifying a bloodbath in advance, reporting that the
> “rebels” have “unfinished business” or “scores to settle” with Sirte’s
> defenders, which are said to include army units involved in the attacks on
> Misrata and Benghazi. The city is also Gaddafi’s hometown and a center of
> his
> tribe, the Gaddafifahs.
>
> The criminal methods employed by NATO and its “rebel” proxies—the bombing
> of
> cities, attempted assassinations, massacres and the lynching of black
> sub-Saharan African immigrant workers—are in sync with the aim of the war:
> imperialist conquest.
>
> Having supported the Western-backed dictatorships of Zine El Abidine Ben
> Ali in
> Tunisia and Hosni Mubarak in Egypt against popular revolts until the bitter
> end,
> the US and its NATO allies decided to intervene in Libya, which lies
> strategically between these two countries. They set about hijacking the
> anti-Gaddafi demonstrations that broke out last February and fomenting a
> civil
> war as a vehicle for direct NATO intervention. To this end, British and
> French
> special forces units were deployed on the ground in Libya well before any
> UN
> resolution was ever discussed.
>
> This intervention was never about protecting the civilian population.
> Tellingly,
> a spokesman for the NTC Wednesday estimated that the total number of
> Libyans
> killed in the last six months—both civilians and combatants—has risen to
> over
> 50,000. If one were to accept as good coin the pretense that NATO waged its
> war
> for the purpose of saving human lives, it would have to be judged a
> colossal
> failure. This war has produced far more carnage than any repression that
> preceded it.
>
> The goal of the NATO war is to install a puppet regime in Tripoli that will
> be a
> more pliant tool of the Western governments and energy conglomerates.
> Ruling
> circles in Washington, London, Paris and Rome are salivating over the
> prospect
> of turning the clock back 42 years to the days when the corrupt monarchy of
> King
> Idris let Standard Oil write Libya’s petroleum laws and provided military
> bases
> to both the US and Britain.
>
> Consolidating such neocolonial aims will no doubt entail an even greater
> amount
> of bloodshed in suppressing popular opposition within Libya.
>
> The crimes being carried out against the people of Libya and the threat of
> a far
> wider conflagration that is inherent in the inter-imperialist tensions over
> who
> will control the country’s oil wealth pose the urgent necessity of a new
> antiwar
> movement, based on the working class and a socialist perspective.
>
> The struggle against war must be joined with the fight against the assault
> on
> jobs, living standards and basic social and democratic rights taking place
> in
> virtually every country. It must be consciously directed against the source
> of
> both militarism and the unfolding social counterrevolution—the capitalist
> profit
> system.
>
> Bill Van Auken
>
> http://wsws.org/articles/2011/sep2011/pers-s01.shtml
> _______________________________________________
> D66 mailing list
> D66 at tuxtown.net
> http://www.tuxtown.net/mailman/listinfo/d66
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tuxtown.net/pipermail/d66/attachments/20110902/4b18f8e9/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the D66 mailing list