New York Times tries character assassination against WikiLeaks founder Assange

[Antid Oto]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

New York Times tries character assassination against WikiLeaks founder Assange
By Barry Grey
25 October 2010

The response of the New York Times to WikiLeaks’ posting of classified American
military documents exposing US war crimes in Iraq is to downplay the atrocities
and portray WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as the criminal party.

The newspaper of record of the American liberal establishment is not outraged by
further proof of murder and torture on a mass scale, implicating the highest
officials in both the Bush and Obama administrations, but instead reserves its
fury for those courageous individuals who have dared to breach the
government-media wall of silence and give the public access to some portion of
the horrific truth about the US war in Iraq.

The Times assigned the job of character assassination to an old hand at penning
cover-ups and apologetics for US imperialist operations, John F. Burns. The
British-born journalist has headed Times bureaus in such strategic capitals as
Moscow and Beijing. As head of the Times’ Baghdad bureau in the lead-up to the
US invasion of Iraq, Burns played a major role in the newspaper’s promotion of
US government lies about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

Burns has been London bureau chief since mid-2007. On Sunday, the Times
published a front-page piece over the joint byline of John F. Burns and Ravi
Somaiya and bearing the disparaging headline: “WikiLeaks Chief on Run, Trailed
by His Notoriety.” The article purports to be based on an interview with Assange
conducted in London on October 17. By that time, the Times had had access for
close to two weeks to the nearly 400,000 military logs released to the public on
Friday by WikiLeaks.

The article drips with malice. One of its aims—to depict Assange as a sinister
figure, suffering from delusions of grandeur and paranoia—is indicated by the
opening sentence: “Julian Assange moves like a hunted man.”

In public places he speaks “barely above a whisper to foil the Western
intelligence agencies he fears,” the authors note, adding, “He demands that his
dwindling number of loyalists use expensive encrypted cell-phones and swaps his
own as other men exchange shirts.”

Such facts are meant to show that, in the words of an Icelandic “political
activist” quoted in the article, “He is not in his right mind.”

Burns and Somaiya acknowledge that “Pentagon and Justice Department officials
have said they are weighing [Assange’s] actions under the 1917 Espionage Act.”
They cite, in order to discredit Assange, the fact that Swedish authorities,
undoubtedly under pressure from Washington, are considering filing sex charges
against the WikiLeaks leader.

Yet Assange’s concern for his personal security and that of WikiLeaks are
nevertheless cited as evidence of criminality or madness. The Times ignores the
fact that the US government employs targeted assassinations and kidnappings as
instruments of foreign policy and that the Obama administration has gone to
court to defend the president’s “right” to rain down predator missiles on people
he has labeled as terrorists, including American citizens.

The article continues: “Now it is not just governments that denounce him: some
of his own comrades are abandoning him for what they see as erratic and
imperious behavior, and a nearly delusional grandeur unmatched by an awareness
that the digital secrets he reveals can have a price in flesh and blood.”

The “price in flesh and blood” is an allusion to the charge made after
WikiLeaks’ July release of US military documents on the war in Afghanistan that
Assange had compromised the safety of Afghans serving as informers for US and
NATO occupation forces. By the same logic, it would have been incumbent on the
American press to denounce supporters of the resistance who exposed informers
and collaborators of the Nazi occupation forces in Europe during World War II.

Burns and his co-writer assert that “Mr. Assange’s detractors also accuse him of
pursuing a vendetta against the United States.” Presumably as proof of Assange’s
irrational hostility toward the US, the article notes: “In London, Mr. Assange
said America was an increasingly militarized society and a threat to democracy.”
It appears that this entirely justified view of contemporary America is, as far
as the Times is concerned, self-evidently absurd.

The article provides an indication of the lengths to which the Times has gone to
solicit damaging allegations from former Assange associates and show, in the
authors’ words, that “faith is fading among his fellow conspirators.”

“The New York Times spoke with dozens of people who have worked with him and
supported him in Iceland, Sweden, Germany, Britain and the United States,” the
article states. It cites “an encrypted online chat, a transcript of which was
passed to the Times,” which supposedly shows that Assange is “dismissive of his
colleagues.”

Passed on by whom? The authors do not say. But the answer is obvious.

It was passed on by the US government, with which the Times is working in
lockstep to smear Assange and set him up for prosecution or something worse.
That this is not mere speculation is indicated by an ominous passage in the
article, which asserts that Assange has become the world’s leading revealer of
secrets in the Internet era, “with as yet unreckoned consequences for himself.”

http://wsws.org/articles/2010/oct2010/time-o25.shtml

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********