After the elections: Behind the Democratic debacle

[Antid Oto]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

After the elections: Behind the Democratic debacle
4 November 2010

Only a day after the midterm elections, the US media quickly coalesced around a
narrative, accepted by everyone in the political establishment, that the victory
of the Republican Party was a popular repudiation of the supposedly left-wing
policies of the Obama administration. In his press conference on Wednesday,
Obama himself adopted this analysis, pledging to work closely with the
Republican Party, find some compromise on tax cuts for the wealthy, and improve
his relations with corporate America.

Underlying this claim are two premises, both of which are false: 1) that Obama
has carried out an anti-corporate program during his first two years; and 2)
that the population as a whole has used the election to give a rousing
affirmation of capitalism and big business. These premises are not only absurd,
they clash with the basic facts.

In the flood of political commentary, no one in the mainstream media has
suggested a far more plausible explanation: After coming to power by posing as
the tribune of “hope” and "change you can believe in," Obama, through his
pro-corporate and pro-war policies, has succeeded in alienating and politically
demoralizing large sections of the population that had voted for him.

The event that secured Obama's election was the spectacular collapse of Wall
Street in September of 2008, which shattered whatever was left of the
credibility of the Bush administration and deeply discredited the capitalist
system itself. Obama came into office with an overwhelming mandate for radical
reform.

The response of the administration was to rush to the defense of the banks. Even
before coming to power, Obama expressed his unconditional support for the
bailouts, which he subsequently expanded. He assembled an administration
dominated by the interests of finance capital, symbolized by economic adviser
Lawrence Summers and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

The administration opposed any constraints on executive compensation and
rejected out of hand sanctions against or the prosecution of those responsible
for the economic catastrophe. Over the past two years, the wealthiest
individuals have vastly expanded their share of the national income and the
largest banks are expected to hand out record compensation packages.

The economic crisis has led to a jobs crisis unlike anything seen since the
Great Depression. The administration has rejected any government hiring
programs. Throughout the crisis, Obama has endlessly repeated the claim that
employment levels are a “lagging indicator.”

After bailing out Wall Street, Obama oversaw the forced bankruptcy of General
Motors and Chrysler, demanding that workers accept deep cuts in jobs, wages and
benefits. As a result, profits for the auto giants have soared while the assault
on auto workers’ wages has become the model for wage-cutting in every economic
sector and in every part of the country.

The consequences can be seen in the collapse of support for the Democratic Party
in the industrial Midwest, the site of half the seats lost by Democrats in the
House of Representatives. In Michigan, a center of the auto industry, the
Republicans swept state and local offices, amid a turnout of only 45 percent. In
Detroit, which had voted for Obama overwhelmingly in 2008, barely one in five
voters showed up at the polls.

The principal domestic program for which Obama is associated is the overhaul of
the health care system. The bill was entirely tailored to the interests of
insurance companies and giant corporations. For the sake of “bipartisanship,”
Obama abandoned anything that hinted of progressive reform, including the
“public option.” Elderly voters, in particular, quite correctly saw the entire
measure as a step toward cutting Medicare benefits and rationing care, resulting
in a significant electoral swing to the Republican Party, which recorded an 18
percent advantage among voters over 60.

On foreign policy, Obama came to power on a wave of opposition to war. In the
Democratic primaries in 2008, his main argument against rival Hilary Clinton was
that he had not voted to support the Iraq war. On assuming office, Obama quickly
moved to reappoint those responsible for the war under Bush, including Defense
Secretary Robert Gates and General David Petraeus. His administration has
continued the occupation of Iraq, vastly expanded the war against Afghanistan
and Pakistan, threatened new wars against Yemen and Iran, and deployed CIA
drones to kill people all over the world.

In every election since 2002, the issue of war has played a dominant role.
Through the actions of the Obama administration, however, it is becoming clear
to millions of people that it is impossible to end war by voting for the
Democratic Party. Among young people, where opposition to war is particularly
strong, turnout on Tuesday fell precipitously. Whereas voters aged 18 to 29 made
up 18 percent of the electorate in 2008, they comprised only 10 percent this
election.

To the list of right-wing policies in Obama's first two years must be added:
expanding the attack on democratic rights and opposing any prosecution of those
responsible for torture and domestic spying; defending the profits of energy
giant BP, responsible for the greatest environmental disaster in US history; and
rejecting any moratorium on home foreclosures, despite evidence of massive fraud
carried out by the very banks that are throwing millions out of their homes.

Under the peculiar conditions of American politics, which excludes any
opposition to the two parties of big business, mass disaffection with the
Democratic Party found expression in the victory of the Republicans. In addition
to capitalizing on the collapse in voter turnout for Democrats, Republicans were
able to exploit the fact that all of Obama’s betrayals and his lack of principle
exposed the insincerity and duplicity that permeates the Democratic Party and
its liberal backers. The rhetoric of the Republicans resonated in sections of
the population that felt they had been duped.

The failure of the Obama administration is not simply failure of one individual.
It is one expression of the failure of an entire political and economic system.
Under conditions of long-term economic decline, American capitalism has no
response to the capitalist crisis outside of an ever-expanding attack on the
working class.

The trade unions and the array of liberal and middle-class organizations that
promoted Obama will point to the victory of the Republicans to insist once again
that the Democrats must be supported. This is utterly bankrupt. The claim that
the growth of extreme right-wing forces can be stopped by the election of
Democrats is the opposite of the truth. The promotion of the Democratic Party
facilitates its own anti-working class policies while creating the conditions
for even more right-wing forces to come to the fore.

The elections must be seen as a warning. The political system, including both
parties, is moving ever further to the right. The aftermath of the elections
will bring a deepening of the attacks on jobs and wages, a further erosion of
democratic rights, and an expansion of war, including preparations for a global
conflict with unimaginable consequences.

In the midst of this crisis, American politics takes on a diseased character.
Like an impacted tooth that leads to infection, the anger and discontent felt by
millions of people are denied any genuine expression. So long as the working
class remains trapped within the framework of the Democratic Party and the
capitalist two-party system, it is the right wing that will exploit the
situation to its advantage.

Workers and young people have to seriously think through the implications. There
is no way forward through the Democratic Party and capitalist politics. What is
necessary is the building of an independent revolutionary movement of the
working class in the struggle for socialism. This is the perspective that the
Socialist Equality Party is fighting to bring to the broadest sections of
workers and youth.

Joseph Kishore

http://wsws.org/articles/2010/nov2010/pers-n04.shtml

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********