Monsanto + Supreme Court + Obama nominee -> Roundup Cowboys

[Cees Binkhorst]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

Ondanks dat Monsanto een klinkende gerechtelijke nederlaag heeft geleden
in Canada, waarin de onvermijdelijke verspreiding van de Monsanto-genen
onderwerp waren, gaat het gerecht in de USA door alsof er niets gebeurd is.

Groet / Cees

Supreme Court Nominee Elena Kagan Goes to Bat for Monsanto, Sides With
Conservative Justices
http://www.truthout.org/supreme-court-nominee-elena-kagan-goes-bat-monsanto-sides-with-conservative-justices59456
Thursday 13 May 2010
by: Joshua Frank, t r u t h o u t | Report


Alfalfa is the fourth largest crop grown in the United States and
Monsanto wants to control it. On April 27, the Supreme Court heard
arguments in a case that could well write the future of alfalfa
production in our country.

Fortunately, for those who are concerned about the potential
environmental and health impacts of genetically engineered (GE) crops,
Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is not yet residing on the bench.

For the past four years, the Center for Food Safety (CFS), a Washington
DC-based consumer protection group, and others have litigated against
Monsanto and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
regarding the company's Roundup Ready alfalfa. The coalition has focused
their fight against Monsanto's GE alfalfa, based on concerns that the
plants could negatively impact biodiversity as well as other non-GE food
crops.

In 2007, a California US District Court ruled in a landmark case that
the USDA had illegally approved Monsanto's GE alfalfa without carrying
out a proper and full Environmental Impact Statement. The plaintiffs
argued that GE alfalfa could contaminate nearby crops with its
genetically manipulated pollen. Geertson Seed Farm, with the help of
CFS, claimed that the farm's non-GE crops could be damaged beyond repair
by Monsanto's Roundup Ready alfalfa.

Monsanto's well-paid legal team appealed the court's decision, but, in
June 2009, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the previous ruling
and placed a nationwide ban on Monsanto's Roundup Ready alfalfa.

"USDA should start over and truly evaluate the contamination of non-GM
alfalfa and the potential affects on seed growers, organic and natural
meat producers, dairy producers, and conventional and organic honey
producers," said farmer and anti-GE advocate Todd Leake shortly after
the ruling.

Monsanto, however, didn't back down and appealed the Ninth Circuit's
decision to the US Supreme Court. In stepped Elena Kagan, whose role as
solicitor general is to look out for the welfare of American citizens in
all matters that come before the high court.

Unfortunately, Kagan opted to ditch her duty and instead side with
Monsanto. In March 2010, a month before the Supreme Court heard
arguments in the case, the solicitor general's office released a legal
brief despite the fact that the US government was not a defendant in the
case.

As Kagan's office argued, "The judgment of the court of appeals should
be reversed, and the case should be remanded with instructions to vacate
the permanent injunction entered by the district court."

Despite numerous examples of cross-pollination of GE crops, Monsanto
argued during the April 27 court proceedings that this was highly
unlikely to occur. CFS and other plaintiffs are concerned that a federal
law could be affected by the Supreme Court's ruling. Courts in Oregon
and California have already argued in previous cases that GE seeds must
also be studied as to the potential impact on other conventional and
organic crops.

Surprisingly, it seems that Kagan does not support a thorough study of
GE seeds and their potential impact on environmental and human health.
In doing so, Kagan has sided with conservative justices on the court who
appeared skeptical that the lower courts had made the right decision in
banning GE alfalfa.

During the Supreme Court hearings, Chief Justice John Roberts questioned
whether the Ninth Circuit had the authority to issue a ban on GE
alfalfa. Roberts contented that the court ought to have instead remanded
the issue back to the USDA. Conservative Justice Antonin Scalia took his
defense of Monsanto even further, stating, "This isn't the contamination
of the New York City water supply," he said. "This isn't the end of the
world, it really isn't."

Apparently Scalia and Roberts aren't up on the latest scientific
analysis that Monsanto's GE crops have, in fact, bred new voracious
super-weeds, which have forced farmers to "spray fields with more toxic
herbicides, pull weeds by hand, and return to more labor-intensive
methods like regular plowing."

"Bowing to pressure from Monsanto and the other biotech companies, our
federal agencies approved [GE] corn and cotton without requiring any
mandatory testing for environmental impacts," Andrew Kimbrell, executive
director for the CFS recently wrote. "And the expected happened: a few
years later, independent university researchers - again not the
government - discovered that this [GE] pesticide was potentially fatal
to Monarch butterflies and other pollinators ... Without mandatory
government testing, we're clueless about the universe of keystone
pollinators and other species that are being decimated as the [GE]
plants continue to proliferate in our fields."

The Supreme Court's decision on Monsanto's alfalfa ban will likely come
early this summer. Justice Stephen Breyer recused himself from the case
because his brother Charles Breyer oversaw the lower court's decision
against the company. Unsurprisingly, Justice Clarence Thomas, who once
worked in the legal department for Monsanto, did not recuse himself from
the matter.

While Elena Kagan has no experience on the bench and has provided the
public with little to no information about where she stands on some of
the most important issues of the day, the fact that she came to bat for
Monsanto two months, at a time when the company is reeling from negative
press, may shed some light on how she could rule in future GE cases if
she's confirmed as the next Supreme Court justice.

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********