Obama ’s Oval Office speech: A cowardly cover-up of BP’s crimes

Antid Oto aorta at HOME.NL
Wed Jun 16 08:32:59 CEST 2010


REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

Obama’s Oval Office speech: A cowardly cover-up of BP’s crimes
By Barry Grey
16 June 2010

President Obama’s Oval Office speech Tuesday night on the Gulf oil disaster was
a cowardly exercise in evasion and cover-up that could have been written by the
publicity department of BP.

The 18-minute speech, coming on the 57th day of the worst environmental
catastrophe in US history, provided no concrete assessment of the causes of the
oil spill or the dimensions of the crisis—in terms of damage either to the
ecosystem or the economy.

The speech represented a complete capitulation to BP and corporate power. Anyone
who expected that Obama would use the occasion to provide the American people
with an honest accounting of the disaster and the culpability of BP had to be
sorely disappointed.

Given only hours before a scheduled White House meeting with top BP executives,
the speech made absolutely clear that the Obama administration takes its
marching orders from the corporate-financial oligarchy. In his response to the
Gulf disaster, Obama has adopted the same approach as he did to the criminal
actions of Wall Street that threw the US and the world into the deepest economic
crisis since the Great Depression. No one is to be held accountable and nothing
is to be done that challenges the basic interests of the financial aristocracy.

In his speech, Obama made no clear condemnation of BP’s actions, either before
or after the April 20 blowout of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig that took the
lives of 11 workers and sent millions of gallons of oil spewing into the Gulf of
Mexico.

He made no mention of the latest shocking revelations of BP’s systematic
violations of safety procedures in the run-up to the explosion that sank the
rig—violations that were part of the company’s policy of cutting corners in
order to save time and money and boost profits.

He did not even note the new estimates released that day by government
scientists placing the oil flow rate at 35,000 to 60,000 gallons a day—the
latest evidence of BP’s consistent policy of lying about the crisis.

Nor was there any mention of a criminal investigation into BP—something that was
floated two weeks ago by the administration and has since been dropped.

Obama devoted exactly four short sentences and less than a minute to the
explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig, omitting anything that could be damaging
to BP. For example, he failed to note that the company’s blowout preventer,
supposedly the failsafe barrier against an oil gusher, failed to operate.

“Because there has never been a leak this size at this depth,” he continued,
“stopping it has tested the limits of human technology.”

This is a miserable and dishonest attempt to place the disaster outside of any
direct responsibility on the part of BP. The issue is not the supposed limits of
human technology, but the fact that BP had no plan in place to deal with a blowout.

Obama proceeded to tout his desultory and incompetent response to the spill,
stating, “As a result of these efforts, we’ve directed BP to mobilize additional
equipment and technology. And in the coming weeks and days, these efforts should
capture up to 90 percent of the oil leaking out of the well. This is until the
company finishes drilling a relief well later in the summer that’s expected to
stop the leak completely.”

Where did the figure of 90 percent containment come from? From BP!

Obama presented the claims of the company, including full stoppage of the leak
by late summer, as though they were to be trusted. This is after BP has given
incorrect and false information from day one of the disaster—information which
Obama and his subordinates have uncritically accepted and passed on to the public.

Obama was silent on BP’s record of deceit—beginning with its claim after April
20 that there was no oil leak, followed by its fraudulent estimates of 1,000
barrels a day and then 5,000 barrels. Nor did he mention the company’s defiance
of the Environmental Protection Agency’s call for it to stop pumping the toxic
oil dispersant Corexit into the Gulf. Or its policy of blocking the media from
gaining access to polluted beaches and marshlands.

As his speech made clear, the administration will continue to disseminate BP’s lies.

“But make no mistake,” Obama said, “We will fight this spill with everything
we’ve got and for as long as it takes. We will make BP pay for the damage their
company has caused. And we will do whatever’s necessary to help the Gulf Coast
and its people recover from this tragedy.”

These are generalities that one could drive a truck through. This is a disaster
whose total costs in economic and environmental destruction rise to the hundreds
of billions and even trillions of dollars. But Obama was careful to give no
figures for the cost of the oil blowout to date, the projected losses to the
tourism and fishing industries, the hundreds of thousands of jobs wiped
out—rendering his pledge to “make BP pay” and “do whatever’s necessary” empty
and without any credibility.

“Because of our efforts,” Obama boasted, “millions of gallons of oil have
already been removed from the water through burning, skimming and other
collection methods. Over five-and-a-half million feet of boom has been laid
across the water to block and absorb the approaching oil.”

This hyping of what is universally seen as an incompetent, disorganized and
wholly inadequate response by the government and BP is an insult to the
intelligence of the American people. The very morning of Obama’s speech, the New
York Times published a lengthy front-page article under the headline: “Efforts
to Repel Gulf Spill Are Described as Chaotic.”

Obama went on to assure the victims of the Gulf spill, “As the cleanup
continues, we will offer whatever additional resources and assistance our
coastal states may need… But we have to recognize that despite our best efforts,
oil has already caused damage to our coastline and its wildlife. And sadly, no
matter how effective our response is, there will be more oil and more damage
before this siege is done. That’s why the second thing we’re focused on is the
recovery and restoration of the Gulf Coast.”

Again, the vaguest of generalities, which are belied by the refusal of the
government to allocate to date anything near the needed resources or take any
action that challenges BP’s property and profits. To seriously approach the
“recovery and restoration” of the Gulf Coast would require the seizure of BP’s
assets and the nationalization of the oil industry under the democratic control
of the working population.

“Tomorrow,” Obama declared, “I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him
that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the
workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of the company’s
recklessness. And this fund will not be controlled by BP. In order to ensure
that all legitimate claims are paid out in a fair and timely manner, the account
must and will be administered by an independent third party.”

Again—no numbers! “Whatever resources are required” is a generality that can be
twisted to suit the needs of whoever is calling the shots, and despite Obama’s
talk of an “independent third party” to administer a compensation fund, those
setting policy will be BP, the oil industry as a whole, and Wall Street.

Likewise the phrase “all legitimate claims.” Who is to determine which claims
are legitimate? This is a formula for denying adequate compensation to tens of
thousands of workers whose jobs are being wiped out by the Gulf disaster.

“The third part of our response plan,” Obama continued, “is the steps we’re
taking to ensure that a disaster like this does not happen again. A few months
ago, I approved a proposal to consider new, limited offshore drilling under the
assurance that it would be absolutely safe—that the proper technology would be
in place and the necessary precautions taken.

“That obviously was not the case in the Deepwater Horizon rig, and I want to
know why… And so I’ve established a National Commission to understand the causes
of this disaster and offer recommendations on what additional safety and
environmental standards we need to put in place.”

Obama’s promise to “ensure that a disaster like this does not happen again”
lacks any credibility. As does his pose of bewilderment as to the causes of the
Deepwater Horizon explosion.

By now a mountain of facts have emerged proving that the cause of the explosion
was the company’s disregard for safety, driven by its drive for profit. And it
is well established that the government, including under Obama, facilitated this
by allowing the company to regulate itself.

Given the servile defense of corporate profiteering by the administration, both
political parties and all branches and levels of the government, there is no
doubt that the conditions for further disasters in the future will continue to
prevail.

Indeed, the real mandate of the National Commission (which is co-chaired by a
board member of Conoco-Phillips), as indicated previously by Obama himself is to
quickly come up with a proposal for token safety improvements so as to resume
deep-water drilling in the Gulf and elsewhere.

Obama repeated his mantra of “coming together” as a nation—“workers and
entrepreneurs, scientists and citizens, the public and private sectors.” In
other words, mounting no popular opposition to the corporate criminals and
holding none of them accountable for their crimes.

In a final insult to the intelligence of the American people, he dragged in God
at the end of his remarks, declaring that “we pray that a hand may guide us
through the storm towards a brighter day.”

Obama’s performance was the speech of an individual and a government that are
under the thumb of BP and the corporate-financial elite as a whole. It reeked of
servility and cowardice before big business and contempt for the public.

It made clear that nothing will be done to compensate the vast majority of
workers and small businessmen whose jobs and livelihoods are being wiped out by
the Gulf spill.

The speech was part of a three-day public relations campaign, including a
two-day tour of the Gulf and Wednesday’s White House meeting with BP’s chairman
and CEO, designed to cover up the preparations for a filthy deal with BP. That
deal will likely include a temporary delay by BP in paying out billions in
shareholder dividends and the setting up of an escrow fund that will limit the
company’s liabilities to a small fraction of the real cost of the disaster for
which it is responsible.

http://wsws.org/articles/2010/jun2010/oval-j16.shtml

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********



More information about the D66 mailing list