The lessons of the Massachusetts election

[Antid Oto]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

The lessons of the Massachusetts election
22 January 2010

The Republican victory in Tuesday’s Massachusetts election to fill the
Senate seat vacated by the death of Edward Kennedy was not only a
major blow to the Obama administration and the Democratic Party, it
was an expression of the widespread social discontent and anger that
is building up in the US.

Inevitably, within the framework of a political system dominated by
two parties of big business, the beneficiaries of popular opposition
to Obama’s right-wing policies were the Republican Party and a
candidate connected to extreme right forces. Therein lies a warning to
the working class.

The policies of the Obama administration allowed the victor,
Republican state Senator Scott Brown, to make a demagogic appeal to
popular anger over rising unemployment and Obama’s reactionary health
care “reform,” a scheme to cut health care costs for the corporations
and the government by slashing benefits and services for millions of
workers and middle-class people.

The expression of discontent is not in and of itself an answer to the
attacks on living standards and democratic rights. It is necessary to
draw the political lessons of the Massachusetts election.

Predictably, the response of the Democrats has been to shift further
to the right. In an interview with ABC News on Wednesday, President
Obama made it clear he was prepared to drop medical coverage for the
uninsured and work out a deal with the Republicans to limit his health
care overhaul to cost-cutting. Insurance companies responded that such
a deal, abandoning the legal requirement in the original plan for
people to purchase insurance on the private market, would result in a
further increase in premiums.

Leading Democrats have signaled that they are preparing to drop even
token regulations on the banks and any measures to rein in corporate
polluters. Talk from Obama advisers about “pivoting” to focus on jobs
and the economy is code language for preparing unprecedented cuts in
basic entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security and
awarding more tax cuts to big business and the rich.

Obama and congressional Democrats on Tuesday, the day of the
Massachusetts election, agreed to set up a bipartisan commission to
propose major cuts in these and other social programs. Obama is
expected to argue in next week’s State of the Union Address that
fiscal austerity and corporate tax cuts are the keys to job-creation.

Evidently, Obama’s handlers believe that they can once again con the
American people by combining this reactionary program with a dose of
populist demagogy. They are mistaken. The Massachusetts vote, which
saw a collapse in turnout from Democratic voters, showed that millions
who voted for the candidate of “change” are coming to see that his
campaign was a fraud.

The analysis of the World Socialist Web Site has been entirely
confirmed. One week after Obama’s election, the WSWS wrote: “Whatever
the initial exhilaration over Obama’s victory, the deepening economic
crisis will sooner rather than later make itself felt in the lives of
tens of millions of Americans and begin to clarify the class interests
that underlie the new administration. This will set the stage for a
new period of class struggle in the United States.”

The Massachusetts debacle is a devastating commentary not only on the
Democratic Party, but on Obama himself. He is the apotheosis of
American liberalism’s decades-long embrace of identity politics, which
has accompanied its repudiation of any program of social reform and
its growing alienation from and hostility to the working class. By
means of identity and life-style politics, which appeal to privileged
layers of the upper-middle class, the Democratic Party has more
closely aligned itself with the American financial aristocracy.

The fact that Obama has so quickly moved after the election to
conciliate with the Republicans only demonstrates that,
notwithstanding the bitter internecine political warfare between the
two parties, on all substantive issues that go to the basic interests
of the ruling class, their differences are negligible.

What are the political lessons that must be drawn?

The interests and aspirations of working people can find no expression
within the framework of two parties dominated by the financial elite.
The working class must repudiate the Democratic Party and the
two-party system and build a mass independent movement that
articulates its needs in opposition to the ruling class.

The only alternative to unemployment, repression and war is the fight
for a revolutionary socialist program to smash the grip of the
financial aristocracy and reorganize society on democratic and
egalitarian foundations.

This is the program of the Socialist Equality Party.

Jerry White

http://wsws.org/articles/2010/jan2010/pers-j22.shtml

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********