Obama comes to aid of Israel over UN war crimes charges

[Antid Oto]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

Obama comes to aid of Israel over UN war crimes charges
By Jean Shaoul
26 September 2009

An authoritative and highly critical United Nations inquiry released
last week concluded that Israel “committed actions amounting to war
crimes, possibly crimes against humanity” during its three-week
offensive against Gaza in December last year.

The report is one of the most damning ever made of Israel’s government
and armed forces. Whereas in 1982, Israel betrayed its duty to protect
the Palestinian refugees in Sabra and Shatilla in Beirut and was
indirectly responsible for the massacre of more than 800 people by its
Phalange allies, this time Israel was the direct perpetrator of war
crimes.

The inquiry recommended that the UN Security Council call on Israel to
conduct its own independent investigations into the military’s
conduct, and that the council refer the findings to the International
Criminal Court if it fails to do so within six months. The ICC is a
treaty body set up to try war crimes and is separate from the
International Court of Justice, a UN body to settle disputes between
countries.

The report predictably elicited a furious counteroffensive from
Israel, denouncing its findings. The campaign was waged throughout the
media, including in the nominally liberal press. Britain’s Guardian,
for example, gave space to Dan Koski, who works for an organisation
dedicated to countering the arguments of human rights organisations
critical of Israel, to mount a defence of Israel’s actions.

But Tel Aviv’s success in avoiding accountability for its criminal
actions rests more properly on the active support of the United States
and silent complicity of the major European powers, all of whom are
anxious to avoid being brought to book for their own contempt for
international law. The Security Council—dominated as it is by the US
and the European powers that hold the power of veto—was the only body
that could refer the case to the ICC, as Israel is not a signatory to
the court.

The inquiry was forced upon the UN following international
condemnation of Israel’s disproportionate and brutal force against an
essentially unarmed population.

Israel launched a massive 22-day offensive against an unprotected
population. It faced almost no opposition in Gaza as evidenced by the
huge disparity in casualties. On the Palestinian side, 1,400
people—the majority of them civilians, including 400 women and
children—were killed, at least 5,000 people injured, and 21,000 homes
destroyed as well as much of the vital infrastructure. On the Israeli
side, 13 people died, and several of these were the result of
“friendly fire.”

Operation Cast Lead was a criminal venture from the very start. On the
first day of the war, Yoav Galant, Israel’s Southern Front Commander,
declared that the military would try to “send Gaza decades into the
past” in terms of weapons capabilities, while achieving “the maximum
number of enemy casualties and keeping Israel Defence Forces
casualties at a minimum.”

The Israeli government knew this was illegal and made extensive
preparations to evade prosecution. It refused to allow reporters into
Gaza, where there were few international journalists after the BBC’s
Alan Johnston was held captive for four months by Hamas, to ensure
that the military’s conduct was shielded from public scrutiny. With
only journalists “embedded” in Israel’s armed forces allowed to
report, the sole on the spot independent coverage was provided by Al
Jazeera.

Israel refused to allow the publication of photos or names of soldiers
in Operation Cast Lead. It made official commitments at the highest
levels to shield soldiers from charges of war crimes and declared that
it will pay all legal expenses abroad. Officers who travel abroad have
first to get approval for their trip.

The four-member inquiry panel, set up by the UN Human Rights Council,
was chaired by someone of the highest credentials: the South African
judge Richard Goldstone, who was the chief prosecutor in war crimes
involving the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and is himself Jewish and a
lifelong supporter of Israel.

He insisted that the inquiry deal with the run-up to the war and
Hamas’s actions, so that the investigation would be seen as both “even
handed” and comprehensive. When Israel refused to cooperate with his
inquiry and prevented the panel from taking evidence in Israel and the
West Bank, Goldstone held public hearings in Gaza and talked to
Palestinians and Israelis in Geneva. The panel interviewed 188 people
and read 300 reports.

The inquiry rejected Israel’s arguments that Hamas, which controls
Gaza, was to blame and that Operation Cast Lead was a legitimate act
of self-defence in response to rocket fire on Israeli towns and
villages launched by militants from Gaza. The war was, it said, “a
deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and
terrorise a civilian population, radically diminish its local economic
capacity both to work and to provide for itself and to force upon it
an ever-increasing sense of dependency and vulnerability” (emphasis
added).

It accused Israel of using Palestinians as human shields and said that
Israel’s economic blockade of Gaza amounted to “collective punishment
intentionally inflicted by the government of Israel on the people of
the Gaza Strip.”

Israel’s actions deprived Gazans of means of subsistence, employment,
housing and water, denied their freedom of movement and “could lead a
competent court to find that the crime of persecution, a crime against
humanity, had been committed.”

The investigation also condemned Hamas, stating that rocket attacks,
aimed at civilian targets, “would constitute war crimes and may amount
to crimes against humanity.” It criticised Gazan security forces for
carrying out extrajudicial executions and the arbitrary arrest,
detention and ill-treatment of its political opponents. The report
also called for the release of Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier
captured in Gaza in July 2006. But it insisted that there could be no
equation of the power of Israel, the occupying force, and that of the
Palestinian people or its representatives, Hamas.

The report also said that all those countries that had signed the 1949
Geneva Conventions had a duty to search for and prosecute those
responsible, using their “universal jurisdiction” to prosecute war
criminals.

But while the UN human rights council in Geneva is expected to discuss
the report on September 29, nothing will come of it.

The Obama administration came almost immediately to the aid of Tel
Aviv, sharply criticising the report as unfair to Israel and for
supposedly failing to deal fully with Hamas’s role before and during
the conflict. The recommendation that Israel be referred to the ICC
was summarily dismissed.

The US and other major imperialist powers have always sought to
prevent any action being taken against Israel either through the ICC
or by countries using “universal jurisdiction” to launch a prosecution
in their own courts.

Belgium was bullied into changing its legislation based on universal
jurisdiction after it attempted in February 2002 to charge then prime
minister Ariel Sharon for war crimes in relation to Sabra and
Shatilla. The then US Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld even
threatened to move the NATO headquarters out of Brussels.

When a Spanish court earlier this year attempted to open a criminal
investigation under international law into the assassination of a
Hamas leader in Gaza City by Israel in 2002, the investigation was
dropped and the legislation amended, limiting it to cases involving
Spanish victims or suspects present on Spanish soil.

As Richard Falk, the UN special rapporteur on the Palestinian
territories and a professor of international public law, said, “But
politically I think it [a referral to the ICC] is highly unlikely
because the US and probably some European governments will create
effective impunity for Israel by preventing the referral.”

At stake in such interventions is not simply a desire to protect a
major US ally. The concerns of the Washington elite, and the political
class in Europe, fall closer to home. Israel’s prime minister Binyamin
Netanyahu spelled out very publicly why world leaders should quash the
report and so allow Israel to plan and commit further crimes against
the Palestinians and whomever else it chooses.

He warned that prosecuting Israel for war crimes could serve as a
precedent for prosecutions against other countries. “It’s not just our
problem,” Netanyahu told the media. “If they accused IDF [Israeli
Defence Force] officers, IDF commanders, IDF soldiers, IDF pilots and
even leaders, they will accuse you too. What, NATO isn’t fighting in
various places? What, Russia isn’t fighting in various places?”

There is another factor that enables Israel to act with impunity,
unlike 1982 when hundreds of thousands of Israelis demonstrated
against their government’s complicity in the massacre of Sabra and
Shatilla and demanded an independent inquiry.

Today, the widespread revulsion among the Israeli population at the
murderous campaigns of the IDF against the Palestinians cannot find
even the most limited political expression. The peace movement has
collapsed and the Labour Party now sits in coalition with Netanyahu,
after earlier occupying a government role alongside Kadima. Its leader
Ehud Barak, then acting as minister of defence, was responsible for
directing the assault in Gaza.

Copyright © 1998-2009 World Socialist Web Site - All rights reserved

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/sep2009/isra-s26.shtml

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********