Global Warming is an “International Conspiracy”

[Cees Binkhorst]

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

Ik schreef eerder vandaag:
"Heel wat anders dan de kerel (Senator?), die ik zojuist op CNN zag
verkondigen dat de USA de hele discussie over het klimaat links moest
laten liggen. "We have enough resources in USA to keep the machine
called USA running."
Yeh, keep driving in your SUV man (jammer dat CNN items niet afsluit met
de namen)."

en nu kom ik onderstaand artikel tegen.
Dit moet die kerel geweest zijn, en anders was de ander ;)

Het zijn beide overigens USA-senatoren. Slimme mensen!

Groet / Cees

Sensenbrenner Pulls an Inhofe, Asserts Global Warming is an
“International Conspiracy”

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/11/sensenbrenner-pulls-an-inhofe-asserts-global-warming-is-an-international-conspiracy/
This speaks for itself:

        This is really an inconvenient truth.  The President’s science
        advisor, who is a former Harvard professor named Holdren, is
        involved in the email scandals and covering up the fact that
        data has been lost, the fact that contrary opinions to the
        global warming crowd has been squeezed out of scientific
        journals – and as a matter of fact – the editor of one
        scientific journal who published contrary data has been fired.
        Now this is an international conspiracy.  Before we end up
        transferring trillions of dollars from the pocketbook of
        American ratepayers to China and India – which is what Al Gore’s
        global warming treaty proposes to do – then we ought to get to
        the bottom of this and find out whether this is really science
        or whether this is a bunch of people with a political agenda
        that’s cooked the books.

I had thought nobody in the GOP was more extreme on climate change than
James Inhofe, who dubbed the idea of human-caused global warming the
“greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.”

But now, in conspiracy-theory-land, Inhofe has a true competitor.

December 11th, 2009 Tags: conspiracy theory, Global Warming, inhofe,
sensenbrenner
by Chris Mooney in Conservatives and Science, Energy, Environment,
Global Warming | 11 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >


11 Responses to “Sensenbrenner Pulls an Inhofe, Asserts Global Warming
is an “International Conspiracy””
     1. 1.   Sorbet Says:
        December 11th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
        Actually you know what’s the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on
        the American people? James Inhofe. That charlatan who has passed
        himself off as a human being for so long is a rogue android who
        failed the Turing test. They have been looking for him for
        years. It’s time someone ripped off the carbon fiber back and
        exposed the circuits.


     2. 2.   JJ Says:
        December 11th, 2009 at 2:47 pm
        He didn’t assert that global warming is indeed a hoax. He’s
        simply questioning the authenticity of the current climate data
        given the circumstances. Anyone with half a brain would question
        current data when it involves sending billions or trillions of
        our dollars overseas. These e-mails prove that there’s a
        political bias in the current data given to the government. How
        much it affected the data has yet to be determined and won’t be
        easy given the circumstances.


     3. 3.   Wes Rolley Says:
        December 11th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
        If you think Sensenbrenner is a fanatic on climate change, just
        get him going on immigration. If the rabble is aroused on
        anything, he’ll be there to lead the charge.

        Unfortunately, I see little chance that he has any real
        opposition in 2010.


     4. 4.   Andrew Says:
        December 12th, 2009 at 1:38 am
        It’s no secret that the data is doctored. It’s freely admitted.

        http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/ushcn/ts.ushcn_anom25_diffs_urb-raw_pg.gif

        The physics calls for a 0.7 C increase per CO2 doubling with no
        feedback; there’s no observational evidence that positive
        feedback occurs.


     5. 5.   J.C. Samuelson Says:
        December 12th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
        Andrew,

        Please continue posting. Your ignorance of what you’re posting
        about continues to show the opposite of your intent. Your first
        hint that you might not fully comprehend what’s going on
        should’ve been that you’re finding publicly available
        information.

        But then, I suspect you won’t understand what I’m referring to
        either. If you figure it out, you might actually stop making a
        fool of yourself.


     6. 6.   Anthony McCarthy Says:
        December 12th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
        Given his family fortune based in personal products made of
        paper, you’d think he would worry about something that could
        possibly destroy many forests.

        There is nothing too stupid and too dishonest for the denialists
        to say, the truth isn’t their object so it frees them from any
        connection to reality.


     7. 7.   TB Says:
        December 12th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
        This just in: AP goes through the emails
        http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34392959/ns/us_news-environment/


     8. 8.   Dan Pangburn Says:
        December 12th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
        Tens of billions of dollars (grants from the deep pockets of
        governments) have been spent in futile efforts to prove that
        added CO2 caused Global Warming while an unpaid engineer with a
        desk-top computer and using simple engineering analysis has
        discovered what really determined the average global temperature
        history since 1895.

        The research, with an eye-opening graph showing predicted and
        measured temperature anomalies, is in the pdf dated Oct 16 at
        http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&linkbox=true.

        With this discovery, changes to ghg levels have been found to
        have no significant effect on climate and Natural Climate Change
        has been verified. This does not show that added ghgs have zero
        effect. It does show that the temperature anomalies can be
        accurately calculated by ignoring any effect from changes to the
        level of ghgs.


     9. 9.   J.C. Samuelson Says:
        December 12th, 2009 at 9:07 pm
        Thanks TB


    10. 10.   Doug Watts Says:
        December 13th, 2009 at 10:33 am
        Yes, Dan Pangburn, and the same scientist proved radioactive
        clocks are wrong, the Earth is 1,000 years old, the sun is a
        giant ball of burning wax, and the speed of light is 100 mph.


    11. 11.   Dan Pangburn Says:
        December 13th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
        So, Doug Watts, you have no ability to challenge the research so
        you make up an ad hominem attack on the researcher.



**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********