Fwd: Re: Bush was guarded from 9/11 strike before 9/11

Sat Apr 3 10:13:44 CEST 2004

REPLY TO: D66 at nic.surfnet.nl

Voorbeeld van hoever de haat bij de conservatieven tegen Clinton ging: ze
verwaarloosden of vernietigden zelfs bestaande rapporten over Al Quaeda!

hv,u
-------
>Date:         Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:50:41 -0800
>Reply-To: Paul Conant <znewz1 at YAHOO.COM>
>Sender: General Journalism Discussion <SPJ-L at LISTS.PSU.EDU>
>From: Paul Conant <znewz1 at YAHOO.COM>
>Subject: Re: Bush was guarded from 9/11 strike before 9/11
>To: SPJ-L at LISTS.PSU.EDU
>
>More on the coverup:
>. The controversy over Clarke masks the fact that his
>book relates high-level preparedness -- confirmed by
>the Wall St Journal -- for a 9/11-style attack.
>. The Bush administration has been covertly blocking
>the 9/11 commission from seeing 75 percent of Clinton
>administration papers regarding terrorism and al Qaeda
>-- despite Bush's assertion that the panel should be
>looking back over the Clinton years.
>. The Democratic commissioners were flabbergasted when
>told of this by a reporter recently, though the
>panel's executive director, Zelikow, had known of the
>embargo for weeks and had supposedly asked the
>administration to do something about it. Not very
>loudly though. Zelikow is a former Bush operative.
>. The 9/11 families complained that the White House
>counsel, Gonzalez, was on the phone with GOP
>commissioners shortly before they roasted Clarke.
>Gonzalez was not on the phone with Democratic
>panelists, it appears.
>
> > Back to my "Bush as Traitor" theory:
> >
> > He knew of an attack coming on American soil.
> > Unfortunately, he had in mind
> > a death toll in keeping with other Al Queda attacks.
> >  In other words, they
> > were thinking the casualties would have been in the
> > hundreds
> > only.....maximum. They knew however, were actually
> > banking on it in fact,
> > that after the attack the public would play into
> > their hands, go along with
> > virtually anything Bush wanted.....as they did.   As
> > Bush did.    Here was
> > the excuse he had been pressuring everyone to find,
> > so that he could get
> > back at Hussein for attempting to kill Pops, for
> > daring to challenge the
> > power of the Bush dynasty. Needless to say
> > Wolfowitz, Perle and the other
> > extremist hawks saw this as furthering the Pax
> > Americana plan as set forth
> > in their "American Century" document. In their minds
> > the feel everything is
> > percolating along nicely. In the back of their minds
> > they're thinking, "God
> > bless bin Laden. He handed us America on a platter.
> > He's done for us in one
> > day what 20 years of our propaganda probably
> > couldn't have".
> >
> > Meanwhile, middle- America is busy switching TV
> > channels, trying to find
> > the latest on the Laci Peterson murder.
> >
> >
> > Gary Williams
> >
> >
> > > >
> > >Now here is my question: If the National Security
> > >Council and presidential bodyguards had a top
> > secret
> > >operation that they would implement when warnings
> > were
> > >high, why was there such a failure of security
> > >agencies to connect the dots prior to 9/11? The
> > things
> > >they missed are appalling. Yet, we now know the NSC
> > >was fully braced for just such an attack.
> > >
> > >
> > >=====
> > >Best regards,
> > >Paul Conant
> >
> >
> > At 07:00 AM 4/2/2004, Paul Conant wrote:
> > >The National Security Council was acutely aware of
> > the
> > >likelihood that al Qaeda might use airliners as
> > >missiles, writes Scot J. Paltrow in Thursday's Wall
> > >St. Journal.
> > >In fact, the White House security team protected
> > Bush
> > >from just such a potential attack during his
> > >inauguration, Paltrow said. The White House staff
> > had
> > >been braced for kamikaze tactics for years.
> > >A top secret security plan was put into effect to
> > >protect Bush and others from kamikaze jetliners
> > during
> > >special events, such as the Olympics.
> > >In fact, the Independent says that the White House
> > is
> > >trying to gag a translator who briefed Rice before
> > >9/11 on the likelihood of such an attack.
> > >And, anyway, the NSC had a thick file of scenarios
> > in
> > >which jetliners were used as kamikazes, it appears
> > --
> > >including the specific potential that al Qaeda was
> > >eager to launch such a strike.
> > > >
> >
> >http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=507514
> > > > 'US knew al-Qa'ida would attack with aeroplanes'
> > > >
> > >Now here is my question: If the National Security
> > >Council and presidential bodyguards had a top
> > secret
> > >operation that they would implement when warnings
> > were
> > >high, why was there such a failure of security
> > >agencies to connect the dots prior to 9/11? The
> > things
> > >they missed are appalling. Yet, we now know the NSC
> > >was fully braced for just such an attack.
> > >
> > >
> > >=====
> > >Best regards,
> > >Paul Conant
> > >
> > >Please share your comments, corrections and tips
> > with Znewz1.
> > >You will help greatly if you pass these mailings
> > along to colleagues.
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> > >Znewz1's theme is press freedom, though the
> > approach can be indirect. Feel
> > >free to quote or reprint Znewz1 mailings in whole
> > or in part.
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> > >To sign up for Znewz1 tips and comments or to be
> > removed from the Znewz1
> > >list, send a request to Znewz1 at yahoo.com.
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> > >The psychotronic weapons puzzle
> > http://www.angelfire.com/az3/newzone/mku.html
> > >Is there a non-computer proof of the 4-color
> > theorem (math fun)
> > >http://angelfire.com/az3/nfold/444.html
> > >Have algorithm, will travel (more math fun)
> > >http://www.angelfire.com/az3/nfold/travel.html
> > >
> > >__________________________________
> > >Do you Yahoo!?
> > >Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
> > >http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
> > >
> >
> >*************************************************************
> > >
> > >To get off this list, send a note to
> > listserv at lists.psu.edu
> > >
> > >In the body, put
> > >
> > >signoff SPJ-L
> > >
> > >Pass it on. Know someone who should be on SPJ-L.
> > >
> > >Here are the directions for signing up....
> > >
> > >Send a note to Listserv at lists.psu.edu
> > >
> > >In the body, put
> > >
> > >subscribe spj-l your name
> >
> >
>*************************************************************
> >
> > To get off this list, send a note to
> > listserv at lists.psu.edu
> >
> > In the body, put
> >
> > signoff SPJ-L
> >
> > Pass it on. Know someone who should be on SPJ-L.
> >
> > Here are the directions for signing up....
> >
> > Send a note to Listserv at lists.psu.edu
> >
> > In the body, put
> >
> > subscribe spj-l your name
>
>
>
>=====
>Best regards,
>Paul Conant
>
>Please share your comments, corrections and tips with Znewz1.
>You will help greatly if you pass these mailings along to colleagues.
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Znewz1's theme is press freedom, though the approach can be indirect. Feel
>free to quote or reprint Znewz1 mailings in whole or in part.
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To sign up for Znewz1 tips and comments or to be removed from the Znewz1
>list, send a request to Znewz1 at yahoo.com.
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>The psychotronic weapons puzzle http://www.angelfire.com/az3/newzone/mku.html
>Is there a non-computer proof of the 4-color theorem (math fun)
>http://angelfire.com/az3/nfold/444.html
>Have algorithm, will travel (more math fun)
>http://www.angelfire.com/az3/nfold/travel.html
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
>http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
>
>*************************************************************
>
>To get off this list, send a note to listserv at lists.psu.edu
>
>In the body, put
>
>signoff SPJ-L
>
>Pass it on. Know someone who should be on SPJ-L.
>
>Here are the directions for signing up....
>
>Send a note to Listserv at lists.psu.edu
>
>In the body, put
>
>subscribe spj-l your name

**********
Dit bericht is verzonden via de informele D66 discussielijst (D66 at nic.surfnet.nl).
Aanmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SUBSCRIBE D66 uwvoornaam uwachternaam
Afmelden: stuur een email naar LISTSERV at nic.surfnet.nl met in het tekstveld alleen: SIGNOFF D66
Het on-line archief is te vinden op: http://listserv.surfnet.nl/archives/d66.html
**********